Decision aid
BehavioralObservation of clinical encounter using the electronic decision aid to facilitate treatment option conversation between clinician and patient.
Other names: DA
NCT Number: NCT02905032
The objective of this project is to evaluate a treatment decision aid for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
The goal of this study is to determine the extent to which the Anticoagulation Choice tool promotes shared decision making and its impact on anticoagulation use and adherence versus standard care in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Clinician Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
Observation of clinical encounter using the electronic decision aid to facilitate treatment option conversation between clinician and patient.
Other names: DA
Time frame: 1 month
The number of encounters that the clinicians were satisfied with the decision-making process. The results reported for this Outcome Measure reflect the response of the clinician for each patient. A 5 point likert scale questioning satisfaction with discussion about anticoagulation medication choice. The 5 point likert scale ranges from 1-5, with 1 being not at all satisfied and 5 being completely satisfied. Any values of 4 or 5 were considered to be satisfied.
Time frame: 1 month
The number of encounters were the clinician would recommend the decision making process approach. The results reported for this Outcome Measure reflect the response of the clinician for each patient. Clinician was asked whether they would recommend the approached used to other clinician for other discussions on a 7 point Likert scale. The 7 point likert scale ranges from 1-7, with 1 being no I would strongly recommend against it and 7 being yes I would strongly recommend it. Any values of 6 or 7 were considered to be clinician would recommend.
Time frame: 12 months
The number of subjects who chose to start or continue receive an anticoagulant medication.
Time frame: 1 month
Patient involvement in decision-making as assessed through video recordings of the encounters using the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making 12-item scale. The 12 items measure observed patient involvement. Each of the 12 items have possible scores that range from 0 (the behavior is not observed) to 4 (the behavior is exhibited to a very high standard). To calculate the total score for each patient, the 12 items are summed, divided by 48 (the maximum possible score), and multiplied by 100. Total score minimum is 0, maximum is 100. The higher the total score the higher the patient involvement.
Time frame: 1 month
The length of time for the subjects visit with the clinician, as measured in minutes.
Mayo Clinic
Other
Shared Decision Making for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation (SDM4Afib): A Randomized Trial
Acronym: SDM4Afib
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05164718
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Drammen, Norway
View Trial Details