Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06154239

Screening With Tampons: Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy and HPV and Assessing Participant Views

Diagnostic trial comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the DAYE Diagnostic Tampon (DDT) with a vaginal swab (self-collected and clinician taken).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

MAIN STUDY DESIGN

A diagnostic trial comparing the diagnostic accuracy, usability and acceptability of the DAYE Diagnostic Tampon (DDT) compared to standard vaginal self-swabs and clinician administration of a vaginal swabs. Diagnostic accuracy will be compared for detection of Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea, BV & HPV.

A total of 350 eligible participants will be enrolled into the trial in the UK and Italy. To adequately assess DDT performance on specificity and sensitivity, participants will be recruited from one of two groups:

  • Group 1: 50 participants with a recent confirmed HPV diagnosis (UK and Italy)
  • Group 2: 300 participants from the general population (UK only)

All participants will be randomised according to sample order for the DDT and self-swab using block randomisation:

  • Group A: Approximately half the participants will perform the self-swab followed by the DDT.
  • Group B: Approximately half the participants will perform the DDT followed by the self-swab

All eligible participants will be provided with a trial kit containing the DDT and self-swab and attend at least 1 clinic visit as part of their participation in the trial. Participants will also provide answers to questionnaires at baseline and after all sampling is complete.

Participation in the trial is expected to last approximately 2-3 weeks (dependent on timing of clinic appointment(s)). All samples collected during the trial will be sent to a central laboratory for analysis, either in the UK or Italy i.e., samples will be analysed in the country they were collected.

SUB-STUDY DESIGN

A maximum of 210 eligible participants will be recruited and provide 2 samples to a decentralised sub-study to assess the DDTs performance compared to a self-taken vaginal swab. Recruitment will be stopped as soon as 21 positive cases of STI are confirmed by the lab.

  • Group 3: 210 participants with suspected or recently confirmed chlamydia or gonorrhoea.

All participants will be randomised according to sample order for the DDT and self-swab using block randomisation:

  • Group A: Approximately half the participants will perform the self-swab followed by the DDT.
  • Group B: Approximately half the participants will perform the DDT followed by the self- swab

Pre-screening, informed consent, screening and eligibility assessments will occur online. Trial team will confirm e-consent and eligibility. Randomisation will be performed at the point of enrolment by a member of the trial team using a re-generated list of treatment allocation blocks. Some demographic information and medical history will be collected at baseline. All eligible participants will be provided with a trial kit containing the DDT and self-swab which they will use at home and send directly to the testing laboratory. Participants will also provide answers to questionnaires at baseline and after all sampling is complete. Participants will enter data directly into the EDC platform. Participation in the sub-study is expected to last approximately 1 week. All samples collected during the trial will be sent to a central accredited laboratory(s) for analysis in the UK.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals aged 25-65 years.
  • People assigned female at birth (AFAB).
  • Sexually active individuals. In this case, "sexually active" is defined as having penetrative vaginal sex.
  • Group 1 only: Confirmed HPV+ diagnosis within the past 4 weeks.

a. UK only: Ability to upload evidence of this diagnosis to the trial ePRO system (e.g. via a screenshot of the NHS app, or similar to be reviewed by the trial team).

  • Willingness to give informed consent and adhere to trial procedures.

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous hysterectomy or total hysterectomy with removal of cervix
  • Known allergy or sensitivity to tampons
  • History of TSS (both tampon-associated and non-tampon associated)
  • Individuals who are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial or use of investigational drugs in the last 30 days.
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial. -

Treatment and study plan

DAYE Diagnostic Tampon

Device

The DAYE Diagnostic Tampon is a class A in vitro diagnostic device. It has CE certification (self-certified via a declaration of conformity, following the IVDR (EU) 2017/746). The DDT is constructed entirely from woven cotton and consists of an absorbent core wrapped in a protective sleeve. The DDT is loaded in an applicator to aid with insertion.

Vaginal self-swab

Diagnostic Test

A vaginal self-swab typically consists of a long, slender, and flexible stick or handle, often made of plastic or a similar material. At one end, there's a soft, absorbent tip made of cotton or synthetic material. This tip is designed to collect a sample from the vaginal walls or cervix.

Clinician vaginal swab

Diagnostic Test

A clinician vaginal swab is a medical tool used by healthcare professionals to collect samples from the vaginal canal for diagnostic purposes. It's typically a long, thin, and flexible instrument. At one end, there's a cotton, rayon, or synthetic tip designed to collect cells, discharge, or other materials from the vaginal walls, cervix, or other areas within the vaginal canal.

The clinician swab is not taken in sub-study participants.

Primary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Daye Diagnostic Tampon for detecting Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, BV and HPV

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks of the samples being received at the lab.

    Accuracy of the STI, BV and HPV detection using menstrual tampons compared to other specimen collection methods (clinician taken and self-swab) via assays

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assess the usability of the DDT (via After-Scenario Questionnaire - ASQ)

    Time frame: Post-sampling (once all samples are collected) - at study completion usually after 4 weeks

    After scenario questionnaire scores - higher scores = more usable

  2. Explore participants views of the usability and acceptability of the DDT

    Time frame: Pre-sampling (baseline) and Post-sampling (once all samples are collected) - at study completion usually after 4 weeks

    Quantitative and qualitative feedback from pre- and post-sampling questionnaires

  3. Explore participants views of the usability and acceptability of the DDT

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 4-6 weeks

    Qualitative feedback from focus groups

  4. Assess whether the DDT is a preferred sampling method for participants

    Time frame: Pre-sampling (baseline) and Post-sampling (once all samples are collected) - at study completion usually after 4 weeks

    User preferences (self-report)

  5. Assess if the order of sample collection (self-swab vs DDT) impacts diagnostic accuracy as assessed by assays

    Time frame: Post sample analysis - 4 weeks after the last samples are received at the lab

    Comparison between the detection accuracy of infections between sample order (Group A and Group B) using assays

  6. willingness to pay

    Time frame: Post-sampling (once all samples are collected) - at study completion usually after 4 weeks

    Willingness to pay for the DDT via questions in post-sampling questionnaire

  7. Understand the health economic consequences of using the DDT for STI, BV and HPV testing - time taken

    Time frame: Post-sampling (once all samples are collected) - at study completion usually after 4 weeks

    Comparison of time taken for DDT vs clinician swab

  8. Explore stakeholder attitudes to tampons as a means of sample collection for microbial testing.

    Time frame: Throughout the trial (and once stakeholders with a role in the trial have engaged with the tampon)

    Qualitative feedback from stakeholder questionnaires

  9. Assess the occurrence of AEs/SAEs as a result of tampon sampling.

    Time frame: None expected, but any events will be collected and recorded on an ongoing basis as outlined in the protocol and analysed at study completion usually after 4 weeks

    AE/SAE occurrence.

Other outcomes

  1. Explore the relationship between duration of wear and diagnostic accuracy.

    Time frame: Post sample analysis - 4 weeks after the last samples are received at the lab

    Duration of DDT wear and diagnostic accuracy

  2. Sub-study Objective: Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the Daye Diagnostic Tampon for detecting STIs (Chlamydia, Gonorrhoea) specifically demonstrating a sensitivity of more than 70% for DDT.

    Time frame: Samples will be analysed around 2 weeks after collection. The outcome will be assessed as soon as 21 positive samples have been obtained.

    Accuracy of the STI detection using menstrual tampons compared to other specimen collection methods (self-swab) via Hologic APTIMA AC assay

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Anne's Day Ltd

Industry

Collaborators

  • Lindus Health

Registry information

Official study title

Screening With Tampons: Evaluating Diagnostic Accuracy for STIs, BV and HPV and Assessing Participant Views

Acronym: STAMP

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Dec 4, 2023
Registry last updated
Jul 31, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.