Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05727228

Screening Triage and Risk Stratification

* To investigate the performance of cytology, extended genotyping, p16/Ki67 dual stain cytology, DNA methylation and viral load as triage markers in post-menopausal HPV-screen-positive women aged 50-64 years in the organized screening program to predict the risk of developing CIN2+. (work package 1) * To investigate the performance of cytology, extended genotyping, p16/Ki67 dual stain cytology, DNA methylation and viral load six months after cervical excision to predict the long-term risk of residual/recurrent CIN2+ lesions among women aged 23-64 (work-package 2)

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

23 year–64 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Department of Pathology

Randers, Central Jutland, 8930, Denmark

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

mette tranberg, post doc

CONTACT

[email protected]

40113676

About this study

As HPV-positive women may have a transient infection which would be cleared with treatment, triage of HPV-positive women are needed to decrease the colposcopy referral. Liquid-based cytology (hereinafter cytology) are often used as triage for HPV-positive women. HPV 16/18 are the predominant HPV types in younger women and are for all aged referred directly for colposcopy. However as women age, hrHPV other types become more prevalent(10) and these types are triaged with cytology. However, as cytology undergo subjective interpretation and as it may have a decreased sensitivity in with increasing age(11, 12) cytology may not be the most optimal triage marker in postmenopausal women.

p16/Ki67 dual stain cytology (hereinafter DS) is another triage marker. p16 is a cell-cycle regulator protein and Ki67 is a proliferation-associated protein which under normal circumstances are mutual exclusive. Thus, in an HPV-transformed cell co-expression of p16 and Ki67 indicates cell deregulation and increased risk of cervical precancer.(13) In several studies DS have shown better sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) as compared to cytology in triaging HPV-positive women(14-17) and women with low-grade cytology (ASC-US and LSIL)(18-20).

Methylation of HPV-positive women benefits from a more objective evaluation than both cytology and DS and has in shown promising results in triaging HPV-positive women.(21) Most studies on DS and methylation have however, been conducted in younger women and studies evaluation the performance in postmenopausal women are needed.

Women diagnosed with CIN2+ undergo excisional treatment removing the lesions and thereby reducing the woman's risk of developing cervical cancer. The most frequently used method is loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP). Despite treatment, women previously diagnosed with CIN3+ lesion are at greater risk of developing cervical cancer with the risk increasing with increasing age.(22) Surveillance after LEEP consist of test-of cure (i.e. cytology and HPV test) six months after LEEP in several countries.(23-27) Treatment of CIN2+ is however, not always successful and residual or recurrent high-grade disease (CIN2+) occurs on average in 8% (ranging from 4% to 18%) of treated women, with the majority of treatment failure occurring mainly the first two post-operative years.(28, 29) Persistent HPV infection and positive margins after LEEP are risk factors for residual or recurrent disease after LEEP(28). However, not all women are at the same risk of recurrent disease, but still managed the same way as women at higher risk and therefore a future risk-stratification are needed to individualize the follow-up pathways. Moreover, introduction of a risk-stratification in the follow-up pathway may also decrease the number of open-ended follow-up pathways. In a recent study in HPV-positive women 60-64 years only 26% had follow-up as recommended.(30)

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • HPV-screen-positive (aged 50-64)
  • Women who undergo test-of-cure (i.e. HPV and cytology) six months after LEEP in Central Denmark Region (aged 23-64)
  • Women who undergo follow-up test (i.e. HPV and cytology) 12 months after LEEP
  • A valid cytology-triage result (aged 23-64)

Exclusion criteria

  • Listed in the registry as a person who have rejected to participate in research
  • Invalid cytology and HPV result six months after LEEP
  • No residual material available

Treatment and study plan

cytology, p16/ki67 dual stain cytology (DS), extended genotyping, DNA methylation, viral load,

Other

p16/Ki67 dual stain cytology, extended genotyping and DNA methylation will be performed from the residual cell-pellet from the HPV-positive screening samples. If no cytology-triage testing is performed as a part of the screening algorithm, a cytology will be performed at inclusion. If any residual material is left after DS, extended genotyping and DNA methylation, it will be stores at -80 degrees for future purposes.

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of women with CIN2+ diagnosed in either cervical biopsies or cone biopsy

    Time frame: at baseline ( within 3 months after index sample)

    The detection of underlying CIN2 or worse

  2. The number of women with CIN2+ diagnosed in either cervical biopsies or cone biopsy

    Time frame: at follow-up ( 1.5 years after index sample)

    The detection of underlying CIN2 or worse

  3. The number of women with CIN3+ diagnosed in either cervical biopsies or cone biopsy

    Time frame: at baseline ( within 3 months after index sample)

    The detection of underlying CIN3 or worse

  4. The number of women with CIN3+ diagnosed in either cervical biopsies or cone biopsy

    Time frame: at follow-up (1.5 years after index sample)

    The detection of underlying CIN3 or worse

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical accuracy (sensitivity and specificity of each triage marker and in different combinations)

    Time frame: at baseline (within 3 months after index sample)

    sensitivity to detect underlying CIN2+ and specificity to exclude underlying CIN2+

  2. Clinical accuracy (sensitivity and specificity of each triage marker and in different combinations)

    Time frame: at follow-up (1.5 years after index sample)

    sensitivity to detect underlying CIN2+ and specificity to exclude underlying CIN2+

  3. HPV genotype distribution

    Time frame: at baseline (within 3 months after index sample)

    We will measure the distribution of hrHPV types among these older women

  4. DS positivity rate

    Time frame: at baseline (within 3 months after index sample)

    We will measure the DS positivity rate among these older women

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Line Winther Gustafson, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+4578420264

mette tranberg, post doc

CONTACT

[email protected]

40113676

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus

Other

Collaborators

  • Randers Regional Hospital

Registry information

Official study title

Improving Screening Triage in Older Postmenopausal HPV-screen-positive Women Aged 50-64 and Risk-stratification of Women Aged 23-64 After Excision

Acronym: I-share

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2027
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 14, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 14, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.