creation of a STIs score risk
Other4 questionnaires 3 screening test ( syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea)
Other names: First period
NCT Number: NCT02413632
Comparison of two screening strategies of asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections : routine screening versus screening as reported by the risks taken by the patient, in a cohort of HIV outpatients men who have sex with men. The aim of this study will be create and validate a simple tool for clinicians. A digital tool will be developed will allowed empowerment of HIV-positive men who have sex with men.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Hopital Foch, Suresnes, Hauts DE Seine, France
Main objectives are :
create and validate a risk score for STIs (DRIVER score) in a population of HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM).
determine the prevalence of asymptomatic STIs in a population of HIV-positive MSM
Secondary objectives are :
compare 2 screening strategies regarding STIs in HIV-positive MSM (systematic screening vs screening according to self-declared risk factors) conduct a cost-efficiency analysis of both strategies evaluate patients' knowledge of STIs develop a DRIVER digital tool that will be made available to patients on websites, mobile apps…
Position of the problem :
Over the past 15 years, a resurgence of symptomatic STIs has been observed at both at the global and at the local (French) level. This has been true for gonorrhea since 2008, for syphilis since 2000 and for lymphogranuloma venereum since 2003. The epidemiology of asymptomatic STIs has not been studied as thoroughly but asymptomatic carriage of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis as well as latent syphilis account for at least half of cases declared in the past few years. The population of HIV-positive MSM is the demographic category with the highest rates of STIs. In addition, risky sexual attitudes are on the rise in the MSM population in general (in 2010, the French RESIST Network reported that condom use during anal penetrations between males had dropped from 49% in 2008 to 37% in 2010).
Screening practices are currently center- and healthcare-provider dependant. Study will allow a comparison of screening practices thanks to a score that will be built, validated and made available to clinicians and patients.
Type of study : Prospective, non randomized, multicentric and cross-sectional Timeline : Study duration : 18 months Beginning of study : March 2015
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
4 questionnaires 3 screening test ( syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea)
Other names: First period
DRIVER questionnaire (DRIVER STI score risk) 3 screening test ( syphilis, chlamydia, gonorrhea)
Other names: Second period
Time frame: 6 months
Construction of a STI risk score
Time frame: 12 months
conduct a cost-efficiency analysis of both strategies
Time frame: 3 months
patients' knowledge of STIs will be evaluate
Time frame: 6 months
Hopital Foch
Other
Asymptomatic Sexually Transmitted Infections (STI) : Comparison of Two Screening Strategies Routine Screening Versus Screening as Reported by the Risks Taken by the Patient, in a Cohort of HIV Outpatients Men Who Have Sex With Men
Acronym: DRIVER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05484895
Behavior, HIV
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02844634
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT01394900
Behavior, Communicable Diseases
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02896699
Behavior, HIV
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details