eLIFT
Diagnostic TestDiagnostic procedure: elastography devices, blood tests (e-LIFT + Fibrometer), liver biopsy if necessary (elastometry ≥ 8 kPa and < 15 kPa)
NCT Number: NCT05699018
The primary objective of the SOPRANO study is to compare two blood fibrosis tests, the eLIFT and the FibroMeter, for the screening of advanced liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD and/or ALD from primary care centers.
Interested in participating?
Request Info40 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
ANGERS, Angers, France
Chronic liver diseases (CLD) are responsible for 17 000 deaths each year in France (cirrhosis: 8 000, liver cancer: 9 000). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD) are the two main causes of CLD in France, affecting respectively 25% and 12% of the adult general population. A subset of these patients develops advanced liver fibrosis (ALF), which requires referral to the specialist for specific evaluation and management to avoid the occurrence of cirrhosis and its life-threatening complications. General practitioners (GPs) are the first-line physicians in front of the large population of NAFLD and/or ALD patients. It is very difficult for GPs to identify the patients who develop ALF and require referral to the specialist, as their physical examination, usual biology and ultrasonography remain normal.
The non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis is now available with elastography devices and blood tests. Elastography is a very accurate method but it is available only in few specialised centers. Specialised blood tests are available to all physicians, but they are quite expensive and not reimbursed with therefore limited use in clinical practice. Consequently, liver fibrosis remains unevaluated in most patients with NAFLD and/or ALD, which explains why a lot are too late diagnosed at the stage of cirrhosis complications with poor short-term survival.
The eLIFT isa new blood fibrosis test specifically dedicated for GPs with simple parameters and easy "by head" calculation. The simple eLIFT was compared with the specialised blood test FibroMeter for the diagnosis of ALF in an cohort of 1024 biopsy-proven NAFLD and/or ALD patients. eLIFT was little less accurate than FibroMeter (AUROC: 0.78 vs 0.81). Using the recommended cut-offs (eLIFT ≥8, FibroMeter ≥0.46), eLIFT was more sensitive than FibroMeter (86% vs 77%), whereas FibroMeter was highly more specific (71% vs 51%). These results position eLIFT and FibroMeter as interesting tools for the screening of ALF in large populations.
As the preliminary results come from very selected patients, i.e. patients from tertiary centers who underwent a liver biopsy, it's necessary nox to evaluate in the real condition of primary care setting whether the use of eLIFT or FibroMeter will help GPs to screen ALF in their asymptomatic NAFLD and ALD patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Following a protocol amendment, the 3 last investigating primary care centres will include NAFLD and/or ALD patients according to these updated criteria:
30% with excessive alcohol consumption 65% with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin and/or at least two other anti-diabetic treatments 5% with both conditions (excessive alcohol consumption, AND type 2 diabetes treated with insulin and/or at least two other anti-diabetic treatments)
Exclusion criteria
Diagnostic procedure: elastography devices, blood tests (e-LIFT + Fibrometer), liver biopsy if necessary (elastometry ≥ 8 kPa and < 15 kPa)
Time frame: 1 day
Rate of patients with advanced liver fibrosis correctly identified by the eLIFT test
Time frame: 1 day
Rate of patients with advanced liver fibrosis correctly identified by the Fibrometer test
Time frame: 1 day
Rate of patients with positive screening test (eLIFT ≥8)
Time frame: 1 day
Rate of patients with positive screening test (FibroMeter ≥0.46)
Time frame: 1 month
Rate of patients with positive screening test (eLIFT ≥8) but without final diagnosis of ALF
Time frame: 1 month
Rate of patients with positive screening test (FibroMeter ≥0.46) but without final diagnosis of ALF
Time frame: 1 month
Number of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (diagnosed on MRI by the recommended radiological criteria: hyperenhancement on the arterial phase and washout on the portal venous phase, or by liver biopsy);
Time frame: 1 month
Number of patients with gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding (diagnosed by upper-gastrointestinal endoscopy: medium-large varices or small varices with red wall marks)
Time frame: 1 month
Mean direct cost per patient; mean direct cost generated to detect one patient with ALF, one patient with hepatocellular carcinoma, one patient with gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding
Time frame: 1 month
Rate of patient with ALF, positive screening test, hepatocellular carcinoma, gastroesophageal varices at risk of bleeding, and mean cost, with comparison between NAFLD, ALD, and mixed NAFLD+ALD subgroups
Time frame: 1 day
Rate of patients with ALF diagnosed by a stepwise algorithm using eLIFT ≥8 then, if positive, FibroMeter ≥0.46
Time frame: 1 month
Rate of patients included in the study who did not achieve the required screening procedures
Time frame: 1 day
Risk factors among clinical characteristics, alcohol consumption, metabolic parameters independently associated with ALF diagnosis
Time frame: 1 day
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using the recommended 9.8 threshold for ELF
Time frame: 1 day
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using using the Camden and Islington pathway
Time frame: 1 day
Same endpoints than primary and secondaries 1 to 11, but using using the Camden and Islington pathway
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Marc De Saint Loup
CONTACT
0241357812 ext. +33
William BELLANGER, PH
CONTACT
02 41 73 58 10 ext. +33
University Hospital, Angers
Other Gov
Acronym: SOPRANO
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04682600
Digestive System Diseases, Fatty Liver
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05384652
Digestive System Diseases, Fatty Liver
Hong Kong, Shatin
View Trial DetailsNCT04820036
Body Weight, Digestive System Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07553663
Digestive System Diseases, Fatty Liver
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial Details