Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06348784

Screening for Ovarian Malignancy

Ovarian cancer is the second most common gynecologic malignancy. In 2008, it was the seventh leading cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide. Estimating the risk of malignancy is essential in the management of adnexal masses and several mathematical models and scoring systems have been developed to be used for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Knowledge of the specific type of adnexal pathology before surgery is likely to improve patient triage with high accuracy, and it also makes it possible to optimize treatment. The correct identification of stage I cancer is particularly important

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Observational

Primary location

AinShams university maternity hospital

Cairo, Egypt

About this study

Ovarian cancer (OC) is the third most common gynecological malignancy worldwide and carries the highest mortality. OC has an incidence of 11.7 - 12.1 per 100,000 in the USA and Europe, with slightly lower rates of disease in Asia and the Middle East. Most patients (60%) are diagnosed with advanced disease which is associated with significant mortality. The most important factor for survival is the stage at diagnosis and nowadays there isn't a proven effective screening strategy. It is necessary to identify the best tool to detect early-stage disease. To reduce the diagnostic dilemma between benign and malignant ovarian masses, a formula-based scoring system known as the risk of malignancy index (RMI) was introduced in 1990, which was termed RMI 1. RMI is a combined parameter that is simple, specific, and highly sensitive for the evaluation of adnexal masses. It is a product of ultrasound findings (U), the menopausal status (M), and serum CA-125 levels (RMI = U X M XCA-125). The original RMI (RMI-1) was modified in 1996 as (RMI 2) and again in 1999 known as (RMI 3), and the last modification was in 2009 by adding the tumor size (S) to the equation and calling it RMI 4. A systematic review of diagnostic studies concluded that the RMI I was the most effective for women with suspected ovarian malignancy.

Malignant tumors benefit from management in specialized oncology centers, but borderline malignancies, stage I primary invasive tumors, and advanced primary invasive tumors might require different surgical approaches. To optimize patient triage without operating on all masses, diagnostic models can be used to estimate the likelihood of malignancy and hence to plan treatment for patients. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group (IOTA) has developed a multi-tumor prediction model, Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model, which is used to describe in detail the characteristics of adnexal masses. ADNEX model can not only distinguish the probability of benign and malignant AMs, but also distinguish between borderline ovarian tumors, stage I ovarian cancer, stage II-IV ovarian cancer, and secondary metastatic ovarian cancers, which includes three clinical features and six ultrasound features

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All the included patients were postmenopausal; postmenopausal status was defined as having ≥ 1 year of amenorrhea without using any contraceptive method in women ≥ 45 years while for women < 45 years, two consecutive FSH samples one 1month apart with levels ≥ 30 IU/L were required to confirm menopause

Exclusion criteria

  • Accidental discovery of ovarian mass during surgery for other reasons
  • Patients with known ovarian cancer who were scheduled for interval debulking after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Treatment and study plan

Assesment of Different NEoplasias in the adenexa model

Diagnostic Test

The ADNEX model includes nine parameters; Age, CA-125 level, Oncology center (yes/no), and 6 ultrasound features which are maximal diameter of the lesion, maximal diameter of the largest solid part, more than 10 locules (yes/no), number of papillary projections (0/1/2/3/more than 3), acoustic shadow, and ascites

Risk of malignancy index

Diagnostic Test

The RMI was measured as follows; Menopausal status (score is 3 as all patients were postmenopausal X Ultrasound score is based on assessment of 5 features and with the presence of one feature, the score is 1 while if more than one feature is present, the score is 3; the five ultrasound features are the presence of solid components, multilocularity, bilaterality, ascites, and metastases X CA - 125 level

Histopathologic examination

Diagnostic Test

Histopathologic examination of all excised specimens was done as this is the gold standard test for detecting ovarian malignancy

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive, and negative predictive value of Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa model for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors

    Time frame: within 120 days from the scheduled surgery date

    The diagnostic performance of the ADNEX model for differentiating between benign and malignant ovarian tumors was assessed at a threshold of 10%. The diagnostic performance was expressed as Area Under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ain Shams Maternity Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Assessment of Different Neoplasias in the Adenxa Model Versus Risk of Malignancy Index as a Tool for Predicting Ovarian Malignancy in Postmenopausal Ovarian Cysts

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Apr 5, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 5, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.