Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT04304651

Screening for Occult Malignancy in Patients With Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the earliest sign of cancer. Identifying occult cancers at the time of VTE diagnosis may lead to significant improvement of patients' care. This is also an upmost issue for patients who want to know if an underlying cancer might have triggered the VTE.

An individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPDMA) supports extensive screening strategies for occult cancer especially based on FDG PET/CT, and suggests that the best target population for cancer screening would be patients with unprovoked VTE older than 50 years of age (6.7% in patients aged 50 years or more vs. 1.0% in patients of less than 50 years (OR: 7.1, 95% CI: 3.1 to 16%).

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hopital Montfort, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The identification of subgroups of patients at high risk of cancer might enable more efficient screening strategies for early detection of cancer. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the first manifestation of an occult cancer. All tumor sites may be involved. In an individual patient-level data meta-analysis (IPDMA), it was reported a 1-year prevalence of occult cancer of 5.2% (95%CI 4.1-6.5) among patients presenting with unprovoked VTE.

Two recent multicenter randomized controlled trials (e.g. SOME (Canada) and MVTEP (France) trials) failed to demonstrate that extensive cancer screening strategies diagnosed more cancers, more early stage tumors, or improved cancer-related mortality in comparison with a more limited screening strategy. However, the main limitation of these studies was the twice lower than expected overall incidence of occult cancer diagnosis in unselected patients with unprovoked VTE, which limited the statistical power. In the IPDMA, it was also reported that the 1-year period prevalence of occult cancer was 7-fold higher in patients aged ≥ 50 (6.8%; 95%CI 5.6-8.3) as compared with those < 50 years (1.0%; 95%CI 0.5-2.3).

Moreover, in the MVTEP trial, the incidence of missed cancers over a 2-years follow-up period was significantly lower in patients randomized to a 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission/Computed Tomography (FDG-PET/CT) screening strategy. Thus, the most promising diagnostic modality for occult cancer screening seems to be FDG-PET/CT. FDG-PET/CT which allows a one-stop whole-body imaging, is routinely used for the diagnosis, staging and restaging of various cancers.

The MVTEP2 Trial seeks to determine if among higher risk patients (≥ 50 year-old) with a first unprovoked VTE, a cancer screening strategy including a FDG-PET/CT decreases the number of missed occult cancers detected over a 1-year follow-up period as compared with a limited screening alone.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients aged 50 years or older with a new diagnosis of first unprovoked proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) will be eligible to participate into the study.

Unprovoked VTE is defined as the absence of any of the following predisposing factors:

  • active malignancy (known malignancy, progressive and/or treated during the last 5 years) except for adequately treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma; Patients whose state of health suggests the presence of cancer at the time of diagnosis of VTE cannot be included in the protocol
  • recent (less than 3 months) paralysis, paresis or plaster immobilization of the lower extremities;
  • recently bedridden for period of 3 or more days, or major surgery, within the previous 12 weeks requiring general or regional anaesthesia;
  • previous unprovoked VTE;
  • known thrombophilia (hereditary or acquired)

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be excluded from the study if they have any of the following criteria:

  • Refusal or inability to provide informed consent;
  • Hypersensitivity to 18F-FDG or any of the excipients according to the product monograph;
  • Unavailable to follow-up.
  • VTE while on anticoagulation (e.g apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban, dabigatran, warfarin)

Treatment and study plan

Limited cancer screening

Diagnostic Test

The limited cancer screening will include: 1) a complete medical history and physical examination; 2) complete blood count; 3) liver function tests (AST, ALT, ALP, bilirubin); and 4) chest X-ray.

In women, a breast examination, Pap smear/pelvic examination (if < 70 years old and previously sexually active) and mammogram will be performed, if not conducted in last year.

In men, similarly, prostate examination and PSA testing will be performed, if not conducted in the last year.

All patients will undergo colon cancer screening as per local practice.

Limited cancer screening + FDG PET/CT

Diagnostic Test

The limited cancer screening (as described above) in combination with a FDG PET/CT.

Primary outcomes

  1. Occult cancer missed by screening strategies

    Time frame: At 1 year of follow-up

    Occult cancer "missed" by cancer screening defined as proven cancer diagnosed (either biopsy proven cancer or cancer diagnosis approved by adjudication committee in the absence of biopsy proven cancer) from the time of cancer screening completion to the end of the 1-year follow-up period, and not detected at the time of screening. In other words, "missed" means the number of new cancers diagnosed in patients considered not to have cancer after having completed the assigned cancer screening strategy (i.e false negative results of screening strategies).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Occult cancer diagnosed by screening strategies

    Time frame: At 1 month

    The proportion of patients with a new cancer diagnosis after completion of the initial allocated screening strategy.

  2. Early vs Adanced-stage cancers

    Time frame: At 1 year of follow-up

    The proportion of early-stage (T1-2N0M0) as per the World Health Organization TNM classification system) versus advanced-stage tumors at initial screening and during follow-up.

  3. Cancer-related mortality

    Time frame: At 5 years of follow-up

    Cancer-related mortality during a 5-year follow-up period.

  4. Cost effectiveness analysis

    Time frame: At 1 year of follow-up

    Additional cost per additional cancer detected.

  5. Recurrent VTE

    Time frame: At 1 year of follow-up

    Rate of recurrent VTE

  6. Decision aid to assist patients in the decision of cancer screening

    Time frame: At 1 year of follow-up

    Development of a decision aid to assist patients in the decision of cancer screening

  7. Additional tests

    Time frame: At 1 year of follow-up

    The proportion of patients receiving additional tests following each strategy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Brest

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Ministry of Health, France
  • Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Registry information

Official study title

Screening for Occult Malignancy Using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (FDG PET/CT) in Patients With Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism

Acronym: MVTEP2/SOME2

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2030
First posted
Mar 11, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 16, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.