contrast-enhanced mammography
Devicesupplemental breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced mammography
NCT Number: NCT04764292
There are women for whom a screening breast MRI is clinically recommended, but not feasible either due to patient factors (body habitus, pacemaker or other implant, claustrophobia) or access (cost, other constraints). Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a potential alternative to MRI for screening that uses updated standard mammography equipment to obtain low- and high-energy images after intravenous injection of iodinated contrast (as used in CT scanning). The investigators seek to validate screening CEM as an alternative to screening MRI.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–75 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 4
UPMC Magee at the Lemieux Sports Complex, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States
This is a prospective study designed to evaluate the role of contrast enhanced mammography (CEM) in screening for breast cancer. The overarching goal of the research program is to improve cancer detection on screening, particularly in women with dense breasts. MRI depicts more cancers than other screening methods, including ultrasound. MRI is proven to both improve cancer detection and reduce clinically detected cancers ("interval cancers") after a negative screening mammogram in women with dense breasts. PA Senate Bill 595, signed into law June 30, 2020, requires insurance carriers to provide coverage for supplemental screening with MRI or ultrasound for a variety of indications. Relative to the number of women who may benefit from screening MRI, there is a shortage of equipment/capacity. Further, nearly half of women cannot have an MRI for medical or other reasons, such as claustrophobia, implanted devices, body habitus, or cost (deductible and copay apply even with the new legislation). Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) appears to have similar performance to MRI but has not been widely validated, particularly for screening. In order to lay the foundation for improved screening of women with dense breasts, the investigators seek to offer screening CEM as an alternative to MRI for women who meet guidelines for screening MRI but are unable to have MRI.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants are expected to have medical or other reasons that they are not able to have screening breast MRI.
Exclusion criteria
supplemental breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced mammography
supplemental breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced mammography
Time frame: 1.5 years
Cancer detection rate per 1,000 screenings with CEM compared to standard mammography/tomosynthesis (DBT) alone. Interpretation and performance outcomes from the primary reader were compared between standard-of-care DBT examinations interpreted alone and DBT examinations interpreted with the addition of CEM.
Time frame: 1.5 years
To assess changes in false positive recall rates from CEM. DBT false-positive findings for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM false positive findings for primary observer
Time frame: 1.5 years
To assess changes in the biopsy rate after the addition of CEM. DBT biopsy rate for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM biopsy rate for primary observer.
Time frame: 1.5 years
To assess changes in positive predictive value of recall (PPV1) after the addition of CEM. DBT PPV1for primary observer (usual care) vs DBT and CEM PPV1 for primary observer.
Wendie Berg
Other
Acronym: SCEMAM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05754658
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07040514
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06604858
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
A Coruña, Spain
View Trial Details