Scores in Critically Ill Patients After Craniotomy

This study planned to review patients admitted to three ICU wards at Beijing Tiantan Hospital between 2017 and 2020. It focused on adult patients who had undergone craniotomy and stayed in the ICU for more than 24 hours. Researchers intended to collect patient information, surgery details, complications, and outcomes from medical records. They also planned to gather routine scoring data used at the hospital and double-check its accuracy. Patients would be divided into two groups based on whether they survived or not, and the ability of different scoring systems to predict outcomes would be analyzed. Additionally, the study aimed to group patients by the type of surgery and assess how well the scoring systems predicted outcomes for each group.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Post-craniotomy Critical Illness Disease Attributes Mortality Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Severity of Illness Scores

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University

Beijing, 100070, Chile

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Jianfang Zhou Zhou, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

8610-59978451

About this study

This study would screen patients admitted to three ICU wards at Beijing Tiantan Hospital from 2017 to 2020. Adult postoperative craniotomy patients with an ICU stay of more than 24 hours would be included. Baseline information, surgery-related data, complications, and outcomes would be retrospectively collected. Routine scoring assessments conducted at our center would be gathered, and researchers would verify the accuracy of the scoring data. Based on patient outcomes, the cohort would be divided into a mortality group and a survival group. The predictive value of different scoring systems for patient outcomes would be evaluated. Additionally, patients would be grouped according to surgical indications, and the predictive value of the scoring systems for outcomes in patients with different surgical indications would be assessed.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Patients admitted to the ICU wards between 2017 and 2020
Patients underwent craniotomy
Patientshad an ICU stay of more than 24 hours

Exclusion criteria

Pregnant or lactating women
Patients enrolled in other clinical studies

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

predictive value of different scoring systems

Time frame: 3 months

We would evaluate the predictive value of different scoring systems for in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients following craniotomy.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jianfang Zhou Zhou, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

8610-59978451

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tiantan Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the Predictive Value of APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, GCS and GCS-P Scores for In-hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients After Craniotomy

Acronym: SCORES

Important dates

Study start: 2024
Primary completion: 2025
Study completion: 2025
First posted: Jan 7, 2025
Registry last updated: Feb 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Recruiting