Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
NCT Number: NCT03922802
This is a single blind, sham controlled crossover trial that will evaluate the effectiveness of acute intermittent hypoxia therapy (AIH) combined with transcutaneous (non-invasive) spinal cord stimulation on gait and balance function for individuals after spinal cord injury.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
OBJECTIVES:
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
We will not include the following populations:
Subjects will receive up to 45 minutes of AIH prior to receiving transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation delivered by a Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Neurostimulator while performing locomotor activities.
Other names: AIH + tSCS+ Gait
Subjects will perform locomotor activities with transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation after receiving sham acute intermittent hypoxia
Other names: SHAM AIH + tSCS + Gait
Subjects will perform locomotor activities with sham transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation after receiving sham acute intermittent hypoxia
Other names: SHAM AIH + SHAM tSCS + Gait
Time frame: Baseline (initial visit within an arm), Intervention session 5 within each arm (T5), 3 days after intervention sessions complete within each arm (POST), 1 week after intervention sessions are complete within each arm (1-week follow up)
The 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT) measures the distance a subject can walk indoors on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes, using assertive devices, as necessary. The test is a reliable and valid evaluation of functional exercise capacity and is used as a sub-maximal test of aerobic capacity and endurance. The walk test is patient self-paced and assesses the level of functional capacity. Patients are allowed to stop and rest during the test, however, the timer does not stop. If the patient is unable to complete the time, the time stopped is noted and reason for stopping prematurely is recorded. This test was completed at 4 time points within each arm: 1) Baseline prior to starting each arm, 2) intervention session 5 within each arm (T5), 3) 3 days after the intervention sessions were complete for the given arm (POST), and 4) 1 week after all intervention sessions were complete for a given arm (1-week follow up)
Time frame: Baseline (initial visit within an arm), Intervention session 5 within each arm (T5), 3 days after intervention sessions complete within each arm (POST), 1 week after intervention sessions are complete within each arm (1-week follow up)
This test will examine the patient's gait speed. Patients will be directed to walk at their preferred maximum but safe speed: 1) Baseline prior to starting each arm, 2) intervention session 5 within each arm (T5), 3) 3 days after the intervention sessions were complete for the given arm (POST), and 4) 1 week after all intervention sessions were complete for a given arm (1-week follow up)
Time frame: Baseline (initial visit within an arm), Intervention session 5 within each arm (T5), 3 days after intervention sessions complete within each arm (POST), 1 week after intervention sessions are complete within each arm (1-week follow up)
The participant starts seated in a chair with his/her back against the chair back. On command, the participant rises from the chair, walks 3 meters, turns, walks back to the chair and sits down. Timing begins when the command to start is given and stops when the participant returns to a seated position. 1) Baseline prior to starting each arm, 2) intervention session 5 within each arm (T5), 3) 3 days after the intervention sessions were complete for the given arm (POST), and 4) 1 week after all intervention sessions were complete for a given arm (1-week follow up)
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
Other
Locomotor Function Following Acute Intermittent Hypoxia (AIH) and Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Stimulation (tSCS) With Gait Therapy Versus Traditional Gait Therapy in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05530798
Back Injuries, Bone Diseases
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05870189
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03459885
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
View Trial DetailsNCT04101916
Central Nervous System Diseases, Nervous System Diseases
Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland
View Trial Details