Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Roma, RM, 00168, Italy
NCT Number: NCT07695519
The purpose of this prospective, observational, multicenter study is to evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy on disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with pathological T1 (pT1) rectal cancer presenting with at least one high-risk histological factor, such as deep submucosal invasion, poor differentiation, tumor budding, lymphovascular invasion, or positive resection margins, after local surgical or endoscopic excision, including Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), or Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM). The study focuses on a specific patient population that has refused standard radical surgery with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) because of its potential impact on quality of life and postoperative morbidity. The primary objective is to assess whether organ-preserving local treatment strategies can provide an effective alternative by evaluating long-term oncologic outcomes, quality of life, and colostomy-free survival.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Roma, RM, 00168, Italy
Background To date, the therapeutic management of patients with pathological T1 (pT1) rectal cancer after local surgical or endoscopic excision remains a subject of ongoing debate. Although traditional radical surgery has demonstrated proven advantages, discussion persists regarding the adequacy of less invasive techniques for specific subgroups of patients, particularly those with a low risk of disease progression. In these cases, local excision options through endoscopic or surgical interventions, including Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD), Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), and Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEM), may represent a valid curative approach. These techniques, which generally carry a low risk of lymph node metastasis, offer important advantages in terms of organ preservation and reduction of postoperative complications, including anorectal, urinary, and sexual dysfunction, which may significantly impair quality of life.
Rationale The choice of a conservative approach must be carefully evaluated, especially when post-excision histopathological analysis reveals high-risk features. These include deep submucosal invasion greater than 1 mm, poor tumor differentiation, tumor budding, lymphovascular invasion, or positive or close resection margins. In these situations, radical surgery with Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) is considered the standard treatment strategy for reducing the risk of local and nodal recurrence, although available evidence is largely derived from retrospective studies. Because TME may substantially affect quality of life and functional outcomes, treatment decisions should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team. National and international guidelines suggest that patients with pT1 rectal cancer who present high-risk features and are either unwilling or unsuitable to undergo radical surgery may be considered for alternative organ-preserving strategies, including adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.
Study Objective This prospective, observational, multicenter study aims to evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy on Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in patients with pT1 rectal cancer presenting at least one high-risk histopathological feature who have undergone local excision and declined treatment with TME. The study will also assess long-term oncologic outcomes, organ preservation, and quality of life in this patient population.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
i) Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, or signet ring cell carcinoma.
ii) Pathological submucosal invasion greater than 1000 micrometers. iii) Positive lymphatic invasion or positive venous invasion confirmed by immunohistochemistry.
iv) Tumor budding grade 2 or 3. v) Positive lateral or vertical resection margin (tumor within 1 mm of the surgical margin) or non-assessable resection margin.
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 3-years
Percentage of patients who remain alive and free from rectal cancer recurrence (local, nodal, or distant metastases) at three years from the start of follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year
Percentage of patients alive and free from rectal cancer recurrence (local, nodal, or distant metastases) at 1 year from follow-up.
Time frame: 5 years
Percentage of patients alive and free from rectal cancer recurrence (local, nodal, or distant metastases) at 5 years from follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year
Time from the end of treatment to the documentation of local disease recurrence at 1 year.
Time frame: 3 years
Time from the end of treatment to the documentation of local disease recurrence at 3 years.
Time frame: 5 years
Time from the end of treatment to the documentation of local disease recurrence at 5 years.
Time frame: 1 year
Percentage of patients alive at 1 year from the start of follow-up.
Time frame: 3 years
Percentage of patients alive at 3 years from the start of follow-up.
Time frame: 5 years
Percentage of patients alive at 5 years from the start of follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year
Percentage of patients alive without the need for a temporary or permanent stoma/colostomy at 1 year.
Time frame: 3 years
Percentage of patients alive without the need for a temporary or permanent stoma/colostomy at 3 years.
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The Global Health Status/Quality of Life score ranges from 0 to 100 after linear transformation. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported colorectal cancer-specific quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CR29). Questionnaire scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. For functional scales, higher scores indicate better functioning; for symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. Individual QLQ-CR29 scale scores will be analyzed separately.
Time frame: 3 years
Patient-reported quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The Global Health Status/Quality of Life score ranges from 0 to 100 after linear transformation. Higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Time frame: 3 years
Patient-reported colorectal cancer-specific quality of life assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Colorectal Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-CR29). Questionnaire scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. For functional scales, higher scores indicate better functioning; for symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden. Individual QLQ-CR29 scale scores will be analyzed separately.
Time frame: Within 6 months from the end of treatment
Incidence and severity of acute adverse events (genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and hematologic) scored according to CTCAE version 5.0.
Time frame: 2 years after the end of treatment
Incidence and severity of long-term treatment-related toxicities scored according to CTCAE version 5.0.
Time frame: Up to 5 years after completion of adjuvant treatment.
ercentage of patients who develop regional lymph node recurrence during the follow-up period, as assessed by imaging modalities.
Time frame: Up to 5 years after completion of adjuvant treatment.
Percentage of patients who develop distant organ metastases (outside the pelvis) during the follow-up period, confirmed by contrast-enhanced chest-abdomen-pelvis CT scan.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Other
Acronym: SCARLET
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07198165
Chemoradiotherapy, Colorectal Neoplasms
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07035600
Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases
Gothenburg, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT07341126
Bowel Cancer, Colorectal Neoplasms
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07410767
Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases
Krakow, Poland
View Trial Details