Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01006603

Saxagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Elderly Type 2 Diabetes Patients, With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin

This study will evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of saxagliptin compared to glimepiride in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

65 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Research Site, Feldbach, Austria

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision of informed consent prior to any study specific procedures
  • Established clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Treatment with a stable metformin monotherapy, for at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1
  • HbA1c ≥7.0% and ≤9.0%

Exclusion criteria

  • Type 1 diabetes, history of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar non-ketonic coma. Current use of any injectable or oral antihyperglycemic agent excluding metformin.
  • Renal impairment as defined by a creatinine clearance <60 mL/min
  • Individuals who, in the opinion of the investigator, in which participation in this study may pose a significant risk to the patient and could render the patient unable to successfully complete the study

Treatment and study plan

Saxagliptin

Drug

5 mg, oral tablet, once daily

Other names: Onglyza

Glimepiride

Drug

1, 2, 3, 4 or 6 mg, oral encapsulated tablet, once daily

Other names: Amaryl

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.

    Time frame: From week 0 to week 52.

    Defined as obtained on or before the 8th day after the last dosing day, as determined by central laboratory. Safety analysis set.

    Confirmed hypoglycaemia defined as: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).

    Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia defined as: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Having Experienced at Least One Hypoglycaemic Event (Confirmed or Severe) Over the 52-week Double-blind Treatment Period.

    Time frame: From week 0 to week 52.

    Hypoglyceamic event defined as, Confirmed hypoglycaemia: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).

    Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Safety analysis set.

  2. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HbA1c.

    Time frame: From week 0 to week 52.

    Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), and the last pre-randomisation HbA1c value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set.

  3. Proportion of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycaemic Response at Week 52 Defined as HbA1c <7.0%

    Time frame: From week 0 to week 52

    Proportion of patients with their last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), as determined by central laboratory, below the specified limits. Full analysis set.

  4. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Time frame: From week 0 to week 52

    Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date)and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma glucose value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set.

  5. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin

    Time frame: From week 0 to week 52

    Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date) and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma insulin value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set.

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 52 in β-cell Function (as Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment-β [HOMA-β]

    Time frame: From week 0 to week 52

    β-cell function as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) model. Value is derived from FPG and fasting insulin; fasting insulin values below 2.074 μU/mL or above 57.595 μU/mL and FPG values below 3 mmol/L or above 25 mmol/L are excluded (as restricted by the calculation method used). Full analysis set.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca

Industry

Collaborators

  • Bristol-Myers Squibb

Registry information

Official study title

A 52-Week, Randomised, Double Blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase IIIb/IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycaemic Control on Metformin Monotherapy

Acronym: GENERATION

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Nov 3, 2009
Registry last updated
Nov 28, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.