Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04326920

Sargramostim in Patients With Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19 (SARPAC)

Phase IV study to evaluate the effectiveness of additional inhaled sargramostim (GM-CSF) versus standard of care on blood oxygenation in patients with COVID-19 coronavirus infection and acute hypoxic respiratory failure.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Leukine® is a yeast-derived recombinant humanized granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (rhuGM-CSF, sargramostim) and the only FDA approved GM-CSF. GMCSF, a pleiotropic cytokine, is an important leukocyte growth factor known to play a key role in hematopoiesis, effecting the growth and maturation of multiple cell lineages as well as the functional activities of these cells in antigen presentation and cell mediated immunity.

Leukine inhalation or intravenous administration, as an adjuvant therapy, may confer benefit to patients with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) due to COVID-19 exposure, who are at significant risk of mortality. While there is no active IND (Investigational New Drug) for Leukine in the proposed patient population, Leukine is being studied in Fase II as an adjuvant therapy in the management of life-threatening infections to boost the hosts innate immune response to fight infection, reduce the risk of secondary infection, and in varied conditions as prevention of infection during critical illness. Inhaled Leukine has also been successfully used as primary therapy to improve oxygenation in patients with disordered gas exchange in the lungs. We propose that based on preclinical and clinical data, Leukine inhalation, as an adjuvant therapy, has an acceptable benefit-risk for use in patients with hypoxic respiratory failure and ARDS due to COVID-19 exposure, who are at significant risk of mortality.

Confirmed COVID19 patients with hypoxic respiratory failure (saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2) will be randomized to receive sargramostim 125mcg twice daily for 5 days as a nebulized inhalation on top of standard of care, or to receive standard of care treatment. Upon progression of disease requiring initiation of mechanical ventilatory support within the 5 day period, in patients in the active group, inhaled sargramostim will be replaced by intravenous sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area until the 5 day period is reached. From day 6 onwards, progressive patients in the active group will have the option to receive an additional 5 days of IV sargramostim, based on the treating physician's assessment. In the control group progressive disease requiring mechanical ventilatory support, from day 6 onwards, the treating physician will have the option to initiate IV sargramostim 125mcg/m2 body surface area for 5 days. Safety data, including blood leukocyte counts, will be collected in all patients. Efficacy data will also be collected and will include arterial blood gases, oxygenation parameters, need for ventilation, lung compliance, organ function, radiographic changes, ferritin levels, etc. as well as occurrence of secondary bacterial infections.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Recent (≤2weeks prior to Randomization) confident diagnosis of COVID-19 confirmed by antigen detection and/or PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction), and/or seroconversion or any other emerging and validated diagnostic test
  • In some patients, it may be impossible to get a confident laboratory confirmation of COVID-19 diagnosis after 24h of hospital admission because viral load is low and/or problems with diagnostic sensitivity. In those cases, in absence of an alternative diagnosis, and with highly suspect bilateral ground glass opacities on recent (<24h) chest-CT scan (confirmed by a radiologist and pulmonary physician as probable COVID-19), a patient can be enrolled as probable COVID-19 infected. In all cases, this needs confirmation by later seroconversion.
  • Presence of acute hypoxic respiratory failure defined as (either or both)
  • saturation below 93% on minimal 2 l/min O2
  • PaO2/FiO2 below 300
  • Admitted to specialized COVID-19 ward
  • Age 18-80
  • Male or Female
  • Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with known history of serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, to human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor such as sargramostim, yeast-derived products, or any component of the product.
  • mechanical ventilation before start of study
  • patients with peripheral white blood cell count above 25.000 per microliter and/or active myeloid malignancy
  • patients on high dose systemic steroids (> 20 mg methylprednisolone or equivalent)
  • patients on lithium carbonate therapy
  • Patients enrolled in another investigational drug study
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding females (all female subjects regardless of childbearing potential status must have negative pregnancy test at screening)
  • Patients with serum ferritin >2000 mcg/ml (which will exclude ongoing HLH)

Treatment and study plan

Sargramostim

Drug

Inhalation via mesh nebulizer and/or IV administration upon Clinical deterioration

Other names: LEUKINE

Control

Other

Standard of care

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in Oxygenation

    Time frame: on Day 6 or hospital discharge, whichever came first

    Mean Change from Baseline in PaO2/FiO2 on Day 6 or hospital discharge, whichever came first

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in 6-point Ordinal Scale for Clinical Improvement

    Time frame: at Baseline, at Day 6

    The 6-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement is defined as 1 = Death; 2 = Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation) ; 3 = Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4 = Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5 = Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 6 = Not hospitalized. A higher score represent a better outcome

  2. Number of Days in Hospital

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 5 months

  3. Number of Participants With Nosocomial Infection no./Total no (%)

    Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

  4. Death

    Time frame: at 28 days

  5. Number of Participants Progressed to Mechanical Ventilation and/or ARDS

    Time frame: during hospital admission (up to 28 days)

  6. Time to Clinical Sign Score < 6 for at Least 24h

    Time frame: During hospital admission (up to 28 days)

    Clinical Sign score (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = <37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = >39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome

  7. Change in Clinical Sign Score

    Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

    Clinical Sign score (0-18) by scoring 6 clinical signs from 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate and 3 = severe): Fever (0 = <37°C; 1 = 37.1-38°C; 2 = 38.1-39°C; 3 = >39°C) last 24h; Cough; Fatigue; Shortness of breath; Diarrhea; Body pain. Higher values represent a worse outcome.

  8. Change in (National Early Warning Score2) NEWS2 Score

    Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

    The NEWS2 score standardises the assessment and response to acute illness. Six physiological parameters form the basis of the scoring system:

    respiration rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, pulse rate, level of consciousness or new confusion, temperature. The total possible score ranges from 0 to 20. The higher the score the greater the clinical risk

  9. Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA Score)

    Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

    The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score is a mortality prediction score that is based on the degree of dysfunction of six organ systems (respiratory, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, renal and neurological systems). Score ranges from 0 (best) to 24 (worst) points.

  10. Change in Ferritin Level

    Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

  11. Change in D-dimer Level

    Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

  12. Change in CRP Level

    Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

  13. Change in Lymphocyte Count

    Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

  14. Change in Eosinophil Count

    Time frame: at baseline, at day 6

  15. HRCT (High-Resolution Computed Tomography) Fibrosis Score

    Time frame: at follow-up, 10-20 weeks after day 10 or discharge, whichever comes first

    The HRCT fibrosis score is a subjective assessment of the overall extent of normal attenuation, reticular abnormalities, honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis . The HRCT findings are graded on a scale of 1-4 based on the classification system: 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing. The presence of each of the above four HRCT findings is assessed independently in three (upper, middle and lower) zones of each lung. The extent of each HRCT finding was determined by visually estimating the percentage (to the nearest 5%) of parenchymal involvement in each zone. The score for each zone was calculated by multiplying the percentage of the area by the grading scale score (i.e. 1. normal attenuation; 2. reticular abnormality; 3. traction bronchiectasis; and 4. honeycombing). The six zone scores were averaged to determine the total score for each patient. The score ranges from 100 to 400, higher values represent more fibrosis.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Ghent

Other

Collaborators

  • Flemish institute of biotechnology (VIB)

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Randomized, Open-label, Interventional Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Sargramostim (Leukine®) in Improving Oxygenation and Short- and Long-term Outcome of COVID-19 (Corona Virus Disease) Patients With Acute Hypoxic Respiratory Failure.

Acronym: SARPAC

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Mar 30, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 16, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.