Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
NCT Number: NCT04238832
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) vary on a wide range of characteristics, which may impact the reinforcement value of the products compared to more harmful combustible products. A new type of low-powered ENDS device has surged in popularity-the pod system. Pods use nicotine salt e-liquids, rather than free-base nicotine solutions that have been used in other ENDS device types. Manufacturers claim that these formulations reduce the harshness of nicotine delivery, while still delivering sufficiently high levels of nicotine. However, the role of nicotine salts in the popularity and use of pod systems remains unclear because no studies have directly manipulated and examined the role of nicotine formulation (salt vs. free base) in reinforcement value and use. The primary purpose of the proposed study is to assess the impact of nicotine formulation (nicotine salt vs. free-base) in reinforcement value and tobacco use. Current smokers (n=30) will complete a one-week baseline period where they smoke as normal before attending an in-person lab visit during which they will sample a traditional cigarette and two ENDS products (nicotine salt ENDS, free base ENDS). All aspects of the device will be held constant other than the nicotine formulation (including nicotine concentration, flavor options, device brand). Participants will answer questionnaires about each product they sample and then complete a preference assessment in which they choose between the products they sampled and their own cigarette. Finally, participants will be assigned to take one of the products they sampled home to use ad libitum (1-week sampling). During the at-home baseline and sampling weeks, participants will complete electronic daily diaries cataloging their tobacco use. Biomarkers (i.e., expired carbon monoxide, cotinine) will corroborate self-reported indices of use.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants will try both free base and salt base nicotine e-liquid and then take home salt base nicotine
Participants will try both free base and salt base nicotine e-liquid and then take home free base nicotine
Time frame: Lab Visit 2, occurring approximately one week after the initial screening/baseline visit
Participants complete a preference assessment in which they choose between the salt liquid, free base liquid, or a traditional cigarette in a series of trials. The outcome of this assessment is the product chosen most often by each participant.
Time frame: Week 2 of study
The average number of cigarettes smoked per day during the one week sampling period
Medical University of South Carolina
Other
Impact of Non-Cigarette Tobacco Product Formulation on Reinforcement Value and Use in Current Smokers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05362318
Behavior, Lung Cancer
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06777784
Behavior, Smoking
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04738643
Behavior, Cancer
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06303115
Behavior, Smoking
Bentonville, Arkansas, United States
View Trial Details