Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02008240

Salpingectomy Versus Aspiration of Hydrosalpingeal Fluid Prior to IVF-ET

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid with salpingectomy in the management patients with ultrasound visible hydrosalpinges undergoing IVF-ET.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–37 year

Sex eligibility

Female

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Aljazeera (Al Gazeera) hospital

Giza, Giza Governorate, Egypt

About this study

The adverse impact of hydrosalpinx on in vitro fertilisation embryo transfer (IVF-ET) outcomes has been confirmed by several retrospective and prospective studies .

Cochrane review of prospective randomised trials of laparoscopic salpingectomy confirmed the beneficial effect of laparoscopic salpingectomy on IVF-ET outcomes in patients with hydrosalpinges.

Surgery is not usually safe especially in patients with extensive adhesions, morbid obesity or previous multiple laparotomies. Furthermore, many infertile couples refuse to undergo bilateral salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion because these procedures remove any hope of spontaneous pregnancy. Other less invasive options for patients with hydrosalpinges as ultrasound-guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid, antibiotics (alone or combined with aspiration) and hysteroscopic occlusion of fallopian tube were studied in order to find an alternative to salpingectomy . Although these methods are simple and getting popular, current data are inadequate to recommend these treatment options instead of salpingectomy because most of the supporting evidences for these methods come from small retrospective studies.

A recent randomized controlled trial revealed that the aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid at the time of oocyte retrieval was associated with improved implantation rate and pregnancy rates.

The aim of this randomized controlled trial is to compare the efficacy of ultrasound guided aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid with salpingectomy in the management patients with ultrasound visible hydrosalpinges undergoing IVF-ET

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinges visible by ultrasound
  • Age between 18 - 37 years
  • Period of infertility > 1 year
  • Body mass index between 19-29
  • Normal basal luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and prolactin concentrations.
  • Normal recent semen analysis (according to World Health Organization criteria).

Exclusion criteria

  • Uterine fibroid requiring surgical removal.
  • Endometriosis.
  • Male factor of infertility requiring ICSI, Previous IVF cycles.
  • History of recurrent miscarriage.
  • Endocrinologic disorders.
  • Presence of systemic disease contraindicating pregnancy.

Treatment and study plan

Needle aspiration of hydrosalpinx

Procedure

Under deep sedation, the retrieval of oocytes is done and then an aspiration needle is inserted into the hydrosalpinx under ultrasonographic guidance and suction is applied to aspirate the hydrosalpingeal fluid completely . If there are bilateral hydrosalpinges, the process is repeated on the opposite side.

Other names: ultrasound guidance aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid

Salpingectomy

Procedure

laparoscopic surgical removal of affected tube is done with bipolar electrocoagulation for hemostasis. The mesosalpinx is coagulated as close a possible to the fallopian tube to avoid any compromise in the ovarian blood supply . In cases with marked adhesion, proximal ligation and a distal fenestration is done .

Other names: surgical removal of hydrosalpinx

Primary outcomes

  1. The Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinical Pregnancy in a Transfer Cycle

    Time frame: 5 weeks after embryo transfer

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Number of Participants Who Achieved Ongoing Pregnancy in a Transfer Cycle .

    Time frame: 18 weeks after embryo transfer

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Aljazeera Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Salpingectomy Versus Aspiration of Hydrosalpingeal Fluid Prior to IVF-ET.A Randomized Controlled Trial

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Dec 11, 2013
Registry last updated
Feb 18, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.