A Study of How Ibuzatrelvir is Taken up Into the Blood of Healthy Adults After Taking Different Tablets of Ibuzatrelvir
NCT07552779
COVID-19, COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT04424446
Background:
Nasopharyngeal (NP) swabbing is being used to test for SARS-CoV-2 infection. For this, a swab is inserted deep into the back of the nose to collect a sample. It can cause discomfort for most people. Researchers want to find an easier way to collect samples.
Objective:
To learn if testing for SARSCoV-2 with a saliva sample only, a nasal swab from just the front part of the nostril only, or a saliva sample plus a nasal swab gives results that are as accurate as the NP swab.
Eligibility:
NIH staff members age 18 and older who are taking part in NIH CC SARS-CoV-2 surveillance.
Design:
The Occupational Medical Service (OMS) collects NP swabs as part of standard NIH staff screening. Participants will give 1 or 2 saliva samples and 1 or 2 nasal swabs when their NP swab is collected by OMS. If their NP swab was already collected, their OMS record will be reviewed for the result.
If the NP swab result is positive, the participant will have another NP swab. At that time, they will also give 1 or 2 saliva samples and 1 or 2 nasal swabs. If the NP swab result is negative, they will give 1 or 2 saliva samples and 1 or 2 nasal swabs the next time they have an NP swab.
For the saliva sample, participants will spit into a tube.
For the nasal swab, the inside of the front part of the nostril will be swabbed.
Participation ends after the study samples are collected. Participants can choose to keep giving saliva and nasal swab samples each time they have an NP swab.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Washington Hospital Center, Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Because of the inconvenience of nasopharyngeal (NP) testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection, we are interested in identifying different strategies for detecting infection. A technique that is less intrusive would put individuals undergoing testing at lower risk for complications, would likely increase compliance with subsequent tests, and would decrease risk to the providers who are conducting the test. For asymptomatic screening, some institutions are using midturbinate swabs instead of NP swabs, for increased compliance due to decreased discomfort. The NIH has switched to midturbinate collection in asymptomatic collections only. A test that would require only expectorating saliva and/or collection of a midturbinate swab would address the issues of NP collection discomfort. Saliva is the most preferred by patients or asymptomatic staff due to no collection in the nasal cavity at all. Although the CDC lists midturbinate swab as an acceptable specimen type, there are minimal data about the sensitivity of this collection for SARS-CoV-2, and decisions to use midturbinate swabs are based in part on experience with other respiratory viruses. Also, if saliva were found to be equivalent to NP for patient testing, there will be a benefit to future patients in providing this option for testing. Therefore, we propose to validate these sample types for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The RT-PCR results based on a saliva sample alone or a saliva sample coupled with a midturbinate swab, will be correlated with the results using surveillance or diagnostic swab samples to validate their use for SARS-CoV-2 detection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
To be eligible to participate in this study, an individual must meet all of the following criteria:
Exclusion criteria
An individual who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:
Time frame: Screening
Validate saliva or nasal swab as a source of detection for SARS-CoV-2.
Time frame: Screening
Validate saliva coupled with a nasal swab as a source of detection for SARS-CoV-2.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
Nih
Evaluation of Saliva as Source of Detection for SARS-CoV-2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07552779
COVID-19, COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019)
Brussels, Bruxelles-capitale, Région de, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT05765396
COVID-19, COVID-19 Pneumonia
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07089706
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07095231
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Rochester, New York, United States
View Trial Details