Nangibotide 0.3 mg/kg
DrugFormulated LR12 peptide
Other names: MOTREM 0.3 mg/kg
NCT Number: NCT03158948
This is a randomised, double-blind, two-stage, placebo controlled study. It is designed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of 3 doses of nangibotide versus placebo in adult patients with septic shock.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (there may be other sites in this country), Brussels, Belgium
This was a randomised, double-blind, two-stage, placebo-controlled study. It was composed of 2 stages with a similar treatment regimen in which 0.3, 1.0 or 3.0 mg/kg/h of nangibotide was tested versus placebo.
Stage 1 was performed to investigate ascending doses of nangibotide or placebo in a sequential design in cohorts of 4 patients (3:1 randomisation). After completion of a cohort (for up to 5 days of infusion), safety and available PK data were blindly reviewed by an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB) before progressing to the next cohort. After completion of stage 1 DSMB evaluation, the study progressed to stage 2.
Stage 2 investigated 3 doses of nangibotide in a randomised, balanced, parallel-group design involving up to 3 doses of nangibotide and a placebo arm. Only dose arms of nangibotide considered to be safe and well tolerated during Stage 1 were to be administered in Stage 2.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
Formulated LR12 peptide
Other names: MOTREM 0.3 mg/kg
placebo
Formulated LR12 peptide
Other names: MOTREM 1 mg/kg
Formulated LR12 peptide
Other names: MOTREM 3 mg/kg
Time frame: Adverse events experienced until D28 (End of study visit)
Analyses were performed in the Safety Set composed of all randomized patients who received at least any dose of the study drug (nangibotide or placebo).
Adverse events: Summary statistics of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
Clinical events, including death, related to severe sepsis and sepsis complications were exempt from SAE reporting, unless the investigator deemed the event to be related to the administration of the study drug.
Time frame: Vital signs were assessed each day from day zero (D0 [before investigational medicinal product initiation]) to end of infusion at day 5 (D5) and on final study day at day 28 (D28).
Systolic blood pressure measured by sphygmomanometer at study site. Median SBP at each visit is summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: Vital signs were assessed each day from day zero (D0 [before investigational medicinal product initiation]) to end of infusion at day 5 (D5) and on final study day at day 28 (D28).
Median DBP at each visit is summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: Vital signs were assessed each day from day zero (D0 [before investigational medicinal product initiation]) to end of infusion at day 5 (D5) and on final study day at day 28 (D28).
MAP at each visit is summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: Vital signs were assessed each day from day zero (D0 [before investigational medicinal product initiation]) to end of infusion at day 5 (D5).
Median heart rate at each visit is summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: Vital signs were assessed each day from day zero (D0 [before investigational medicinal product initiation]) to end of infusion at day 5 (D5).
Median temperature at each visit is summarized by treatment group.
Time frame: Electrocardiogram was performed each day from D0 (before IMP initiation) to D5 (EOI) and on D28 (EOS).
Abnormal and emergent clinically significant electrocardiogram were summarized for each group.
Time frame: Anti-Drug Antibodies test were done at D0, D10 and D28 in all patients.
Anti-Drug Antibodies test was performed for all patients.
Time frame: Anti-Drug Antibodies test were measured at D0, D10 and D28.
Anti-Drug Antibodies test was performed for all patients.
Time frame: Baseline: pre-dose sample at Day 0 (D0) Daily up to Day 5 (D5) (or the last day in the study/EOI) If possible, at D5/EOI: - 15 min before end of infusion (EOI) - 10 min after EOI - 30 min after EOI - 2h after EOI
As no pharmacokinetic sample was planned just after the loading dose, maximum observed nangibotide plasma concentration (Cmax) was in the same magnitude as steady-state concentration during the maintenance infusion, calculated as the median of the observed pre-dose concentration from day2 onwards up to the last pre-dose concentration available in the study (Cavg).
Time frame: Baseline: pre-dose sample at Day 0 (D0) Daily up to Day 5 (D5) (or the last day in the study/EOI) If possible, at D5/EOI: - 15 min before end of infusion (EOI) - 10 min after EOI - 30 min after EOI - 2h after EOI
Time to reach the maximum observed nangibotide plasma concentration (h) was measured for all groups.
Time frame: Baseline: pre-dose sample at Day 0 (D0) Daily up to Day 5 (D5) (or the last day in the study/EOI) If possible, at D5/EOI: - 15 min before end of infusion (EOI) - 10 min after EOI - 30 min after EOI - 2h after EOI
Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration Clast was calculated using the log-linear trapezoidal method.
Time frame: Baseline: pre-dose sample at Day 0 (D0) Daily up to Day 5 (D5) (or the last day in the study/EOI) If possible, at D5/EOI: - 15 min before end of infusion (EOI) - 10 min after EOI - 30 min after EOI - 2h after EOI
Steady-state concentration during the maintenance infusion was calculated as the median of the observed pre-dose concentration from day2 onwards up to the last pre-dose concentration available in the study.
Time frame: Baseline: pre-dose sample at Day 0 (D0) Daily up to Day 5 (D5) (or the last day in the study/EOI) If possible, at D5/EOI: - 15 min before end of infusion (EOI) - 10 min after EOI - 30 min after EOI - 2h after EOI
Systemic clearance was calculated as the ratio between the infusion rate during the maintenance infusion and Cavg.
Inotrem
Industry
Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of 3 Doses of MOTREM in Patients With Septic Shock. A Randomised, Double-blind, Two-Stage, Placebo Controlled Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06727318
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Ankara, KEÇİÖREN, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04576819
Infections, Inflammation
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05961137
Emergency Medical Services, Fluid Therapy
Orange Park, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02782013
Community-Acquired Infections, Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Graz, Austria
View Trial Details