Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent ( Site 0001)
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT03326986
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of MK-7252 in healthy adults. Participants receive ascending doses of MK-7252 over five treatment periods. Each treatment period is separated by a 7-day washout period.
Upon review of the interim safety and preliminary PK data of human exposure to date, Protocol Amendment 3 includes a third panel of participants, Panel C, to assess the PK of higher doses of MK-7252 and to assess the food effect of MK-7252.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–50 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Three panels (Panels A, B, and C) of 8 healthy participants (n=6 MK-7252, n=2 placebo) are enrolled. In Panels A and B, participants will alternately receive single rising doses of MK-7252 or placebo for 5 treatment periods. In Panel C, participants will receive single rising doses of MK-7252 or placebo for up to 5 treatment periods. All doses in Panels A and B will be administered in the fasted state during the 5 treatment periods. Doses in Panel C will be administered in a fasted state in treatment periods 1 through 4 and the treatment period 1 dose will be repeated in a fed state during treatment period 5. Panel A will begin first. At least 3 days will elapse before participants in Panel B will receive the next higher dose. For all panels, there will be at least 7 days washout between treatment periods for any given participant. Participants may only be enrolled in one panel of the study. The planned dose levels may be adjusted downward or replaced based on evaluation of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic data observed after previous treatment periods. All participants in the treatment periods of all panels (with exception of 120 mg fasted/fed periods in Panel C) will be randomly assigned to either study drug or placebo; that is a participant could be assigned to receive study drug in one period and placebo in another. As per the protocol allocation plan, the same participants in Panel C will receive 120 mg MK-7252 in a fasted and fed state. In addition, during any of the treatment periods if a participant demonstrates change in any one of the protocol-defined parameters lasting ≥2 hours, dose escalation in that participant will be halted and the participant may be withdrawn from the study or re-challenged at same dose or at a lower or divided dose. Participants that meet criteria listed will be followed up until parameters no longer meet stopping rule criteria.
During the study, participants in Panel A were planned to receive placebo, 1 mg, 6 mg, 24 mg, 72 mg and 108 mg, all in a fasted state in 5 periods. Participants in Panel B were planned to receive placebo, 3 mg, 12 mg, 48 mg, 72 mg and 162 mg, all in a fasted state in 5 periods. All periods in Panels A and B were conducted. Participants in Panel C were planned to receive placebo fasted, placebo fed, 120 mg fasted, 240 mg fasted, 360 mg fasted, 540 mg fasted, and 120 mg fed in 5 periods. Periods 4 and 5 were not conducted and, as a result, the 240 mg fasted, 360 mg fasted, 540 mg fasted, 120 mg fed, and placebo fed doses were not administered. A 180 mg fasted dose was added during Period 3.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
1 mg/mL or 20 mg/mL of powder for oral suspension administered with a water volume that brings the total ingested volume to approximately 240 mL
Placebo powder for oral suspension administered with a water volume that brings the total ingested volume to approximately 240 mL
Time frame: Up to approximately 21 weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have had a causal relationship with this treatment. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of study treatment, was also an AE. Adverse events are reported by dose taken at time of event and not by panel or period. The adverse events for placebo are pooled over periods across panels. The number of participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 19 weeks
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study treatment and which did not necessarily have to have had a causal relationship with this treatment. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that was temporally associated with the use of study treatment, was also an AE. Discontinuations are reported by dose taken at time of event. The discontinuations for placebo are pooled over periods across panels. The number of participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.
Time frame: Predose (Day 1) and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained predose (Day 1) and at designated times postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 AUC0-∞ reported as back-transformed least squares mean and confidence interval calculated using a linear mixed effects model performed on natural log-transformed values. Pharmacokinetic (PK) results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma AUC0-∞ following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma AUC0-∞ in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: Predose (Day 1), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained predose (Day 1) and at designated times postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 AUC0-24hr reported as back-transformed least squares mean and confidence interval calculated using a linear mixed effects model performed on natural log-transformed values. PK results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma AUC0-24hr following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma AUC0-24hr in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: Predose (Day 1), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, and 12 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained predose (Day 1) and at designated times postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 AUC0-12hr reported as back-transformed least squares mean and confidence interval calculated using a linear mixed effects model performed on natural log-transformed values. PK results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma AUC0-12hr following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma AUC0-12hr in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: Predose (Day 1), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained predose (Day 1) and at designated times postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 AUClast reported as back-transformed least squares mean and confidence interval calculated using a linear mixed effects model performed on natural log-transformed values. PK results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma AUClast following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma AUClast in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: Predose (Day 1), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained predose (Day 1) and at designated times postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 Cmax reported as back-transformed least squares mean and confidence interval calculated using a linear mixed effects model performed on natural log-transformed values. PK results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma Cmax following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma Cmax in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: 12 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained 12 hours postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 C12hr reported as back-transformed least squares mean and confidence interval calculated using a linear mixed effects model performed on natural log-transformed values. For participants in a given dose that had C12hr values less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), the C12hr value was imputed as half x LLOQ. The LLOQ was 2.74 nmol/L. PK results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma C12hr following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma C12hr in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: 24 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained 24 hours postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 C24hr reported as back-transformed least squares mean and confidence interval calculated using a linear mixed effects model performed on natural log-transformed values. For participants in a given dose that had C24hr values less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), the C24hr value was imputed as half x LLOQ. The LLOQ was 2.74 nmol/L. PK results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma C24hr following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma C24hr in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: Predose (Day 1), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained predose (Day 1) and at designated times postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 Tmax. PK results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma Tmax following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma Tmax in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: Predose (Day 1), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postdose
Blood samples were obtained predose (Day 1) and at designated times postdose to calculate the plasma MK-7252 t½ reported as Geometric Mean with Percent Geometric Coefficient of Variation. PK results were reported by dose taken in Panels A and B. For Panel C, PK results were reported by dose taken and by individual period. Periods in a panel were not conducted if it became evident that exposures at the escalated dosing would not adequately reach the projected PK target. Although the plasma t½ following a high-fat breakfast (fed state) was planned to be compared to the plasma t½ in the fasted stated in Panel C, the fed state dose was not administered.
Time frame: Baseline (Predose Day 1) and 4 hours postdose
Assessment of the change from baseline in SBP was obtained using a validated, semi-automated oscillometric device. Baseline was defined as the average of predose measurements. A measurement set was considered 2 SBP measurements: baseline and 4 hours postdose. SBP results are reported by dose taken. Placebo measurements are pooled over periods across panels. A positive number indicates an increase in SBP and a negative number indicates a decrease in SBP.
Time frame: Baseline (Predose Day 1) and 24 hours postdose
Assessment of the change from baseline in SBP was obtained using a validated, semi-automated oscillometric device. Baseline was defined as the average of predose measurements. A measurement set was considered 2 SBP measurements: baseline and 24 hours postdose. SBP results are reported by dose taken. Placebo measurements are pooled over periods across panels. A positive number indicates an increase in SBP and a negative number indicates a decrease in SBP.
Time frame: Baseline (Predose Day 1) and 4 hours postdose
Assessment of the change from baseline in DBP was obtained using a validated, semi-automated oscillometric device. Baseline was defined as the average of predose measurements. A measurement set was considered 2 DBP measurements: baseline and 4 hours postdose. DBP results are reported by dose taken. Placebo measurements are pooled over periods across panels. A positive number indicates an increase in DBP and a negative number indicates a decrease in DBP.
Time frame: Baseline (Predose Day 1) and 24 hours postdose
Assessment of the change from baseline in DBP was obtained using a validated, semi-automated oscillometric device. Baseline was defined as the average of predose measurements. A measurement set was considered 2 DBP measurements: baseline and 24 hours postdose. DBP results are reported by dose taken. Placebo measurements are pooled over periods across panels. A positive number indicates an increase in DBP and a negative number indicates a decrease in DBP.
Time frame: Baseline (Predose Day 1) and 4 hours postdose
Assessment of the change from baseline in HR was obtained using a validated, semi-automated oscillometric device. Baseline was defined as the average of predose measurements. A measurement set was considered 2 HR measurements: baseline and 4 hours postdose. HR results are reported by dose taken. Placebo measurements are pooled over periods across panels. A positive number indicates an increase in HR and a negative number indicates a decrease in HR.
Time frame: Baseline (Predose Day 1) and 24 hours postdose
Assessment of the change from baseline in HR was obtained using a validated, semi-automated oscillometric device. Baseline was defined as the average of predose measurements. A measurement set was considered 2 HR measurements: baseline and 24 hours postdose. HR results are reported by dose taken. Placebo measurements are pooled over periods across panels. A positive number indicates an increase in HR and a negative number indicates a decrease in HR.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Single Ascending Dose Clinical Trial to Study the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of MK-7252 in Healthy Subjects
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02054754
Cancer, Neoplasms
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT01260025
Endostatin, Neoplasms
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT07560150
Insulin Aspart, Pharmacodynamics
Chula Vista, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05142592
Pharmacokinetics, Safety Issues
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial Details