Celerion Belfast
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 6 AD, United Kingdom
NCT Number: NCT03635086
The purpose of this study is to investigate immunogenicity and safety of Measles Virus-Chikungunya (MV-CHIK) vaccine in different dose regimens, 28 days after one or two vaccinations.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Belfast, Northern Ireland, BT9 6 AD, United Kingdom
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, lyophilized low dose (powder for suspension in water for intramuscular [IM] injection): 5x10^4 ±0.5 log tissue culture infectious dose 50 (TCID50)/dose.
MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid frozen low dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10^5 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.
MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid SPS® low dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10^5 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.
MV-CHIK, a live-attenuated recombinant measles vaccine expressing Chikungunya virus antigens, liquid frozen high dose (suspension for IM injection): 1x10^6 ±0.5 log TCID50/dose.
Sterile physiological saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride [NaCl]), administered by IM injection.
Time frame: 28 days after last vaccination (Up to Day 56)
Participant serum was collected for determination of antibody responses by 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50). Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) of functional antibodies as measured by PRNT50 were assessed. Geometric mean titers and GMT ratios were estimated by applying an analysis of variance (ANOVA) including the factor treatment group. This was done using log10 transformed data and taking the anti-log of the resulting point estimates for the least squares means, least squares means differences and the corresponding 2 sided 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-values were also provided to compare GMTs between treatment groups adjusted for multiple comparisons according to Tukey Kramer.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
An adverse event (AE) includes any untoward medical occurrence in a participant to whom an IMP has been administered, not necessarily caused by or related to that product. An AE can therefore be any unfavourable or unintended sign, abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of an IMP whether or not considered related to the IMP. The percentage of participants with solicited and unsolicited AEs was assessed.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, and consists of a congenital anomaly, birth defect or other important medical events. As per the protocol, adverse events were analyzed per treatment group but were not assessed with respect to individual vaccinations.
Time frame: Up to Day 365
Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, 56, 182, and 365) for determination of antibody response by PRNT50. These results represent geometric mean titers (titers <10 were set to 5 for protocol-specified analysis).
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Cellular immunogenicity will be determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of subjects.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Cellular immunogenicity was determined by the evaluation of T cell immune response. Blood was collected for the isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). PBMCs were isolated from whole blood to determine functional Interleukin 2 (IL-2)-producing T cells on day 0, 14, 28, 42, and 56 and in a subset of participants.
Time frame: Up to Day 365
Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, 56, 182, and 365) for determination of Chikungunya antibody response by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The analysis of variance GMT of Chikungunya-ELISA antibodies between treatment groups is summarized.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
Participant serum was collected at each visit (Day 0, 28, and 56) for determination of antibody responses by ELISA.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Abnormal laboratory hematology value was any AE reported under the System Organ Class of Investigations that was related to an abnormal laboratory hematology value.
Time frame: Up to Day 56
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Abnormal laboratory chemistry value was any AE reported under the System Organ Class of Investigations that was related to an abnormal laboratory chemistry value.
Themis Bioscience GmbH
Industry
Observer Blinded, Randomised Study to Investigate Safety, Tolerability and Long-term Immunogenicity of Different Dose Regimens and Formulations of MV-CHIK in Healthy Volunteers
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04441905
Alphavirus Infections, Arbovirus Infections
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06106581
Alphavirus Infections, Arbovirus Infections
Santo Domingo, Gazcue, Dominican Republic
View Trial DetailsNCT04909411
Alphavirus Infections, Arbovirus Infections
Saint-Pierre, Reunion
View Trial DetailsNCT04786444
Alphavirus Infections, Arbovirus Infections
Coral Gables, Florida, United States
View Trial Details