Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02476006

Safety, Tolerability, and Effect of Alirocumab in High Cardiovascular Risk Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Conventional Lipid-modifying Therapies (ODYSSEY APPRISE)

Primary Objective:

To provide participants with severe hypercholesterolemia at risk for subsequent cardiovascular (CV) events and not adequately controlled with currently available lipid-modifying therapy (LMT) access to alirocumab ahead of commercial availability and to document the overall safety and tolerability of alirocumab in this participant population.

Secondary Objectives:

To document the effect of alirocumab on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels as well as non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), total cholesterol (total-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride (TG) levels after 12 weeks of treatment.

To document participant's acceptability of self-injection (Self Injection Assessment Questionnaire, SIAQ).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Investigational Site Number 040001, Graz, Austria

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study duration included a screening period of up to 3 weeks, a treatment period of a minimum of 12 weeks and up to a maximum of 120 weeks (30 months), and at least 2 weeks after the last study treatment injection.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Either A, B, C, D, or E below and not adequately controlled with a maximally tolerated dose of statin with or without other LMTs, all at stable doses for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit (Week-3):

A. Participants suffering from heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) with LDL-C concentrations greater than or equal to (>=)160 mg/dL (4.14 millimoles per liter [mmol/L]) despite treatment.

B. Participants suffering from heFH with LDL-C concentrations >=130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L) despite treatment and two or more CV risk factors among this list:

  • LDL-C greater than (>) 250 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (6.46 mmol/L) at the time of the familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) diagnosis (before treatment).
  • Family history of premature-onset coronary heart disease (CHD; first-degree male relative with onset before age 55 years; first-degree female relative with onset before age 65 years).
  • Metabolic syndrome.
  • HDL-C less than (<) 40 mg/dL (1.03 mmol/L).
  • Hypertension (blood pressure >140/90 mmHg or drug treatment).
  • Lipoprotein a (Lp[a]) >=50 mg/dL (1.78 µmol/L).
  • Tendon xanthoma.

C. Participants suffering from heFH with LDL-C concentrations >=130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L) despite treatment and one of the following characteristics:

  • Established CHD or other cardiovascular disease (CVD; history of acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial disease, coronary or peripheral arterial revascularization, stable or unstable angina, transient ischemic attack, carotid artery stenosis >=50 percent (%), or aortic abdominal aneurysm).
  • Drug-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus or type 1 with target organ damage.
  • Family history of first- or second-degree relative with very premature onset CHD (first- or second-degree male relative with onset before age 45; first- or second-degree female relative with onset before age 55).

D. Non-FH participants suffering from established CHD or other CVD (history of acute myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, peripheral arterial disease, coronary or peripheral arterial revascularization, stable or unstable angina, transient ischemic attack, carotid artery stenosis >=50%, or aortic abdominal aneurysm) and with LDL-C concentrations >=130 mg/dL (3.36 mmol/L).

E. Participants suffering from progressive CVD (coronary artery disease, or peripheral arterial occlusive disease or cerebrovascular disease as documented clinically or by imaging techniques, with a subsequent CV event [acute MI, ischemic stroke, ischemia-driven revascularization, unstable angina, transient ischemic attack] occurring despite stable doses of maximally tolerated LMT) with LDL-C concentrations >=100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L).

Exclusion criteria

Not on a stable dose of LMT (including statin) for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit (Week -3) and from screening to enrollment.

Use of a fibrate other than fenofibrate within 4 weeks of the screening visit (Week-3) or between screening and enrollment.

Daily doses above atorvastatin 80 mg, rosuvastatin 40 mg, or simvastatin 40 mg (except for participants on simvastatin 80 mg for more than one year, who were eligible).

Use of statin other than simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin prior to the screening visit (Week-3) or between screening and enrollment, except when there was a documented reason for intolerance to the above mentioned potent statins (in which case the use of a different statin was allowed).

Fasting serum TG >400 mg/dL (>4.52 mmol/L) at the screening visit (Week -3). Uncontrolled hypertension (>180 mmHg systolic and/or >110 mmHg diastolic at randomization visit).

New York Heart Association Class III or IV congestive heart failure persisting despite treatment.

History of hemorrhagic stroke. Liver transaminases >3 times the upper limit of normal. Laboratory evidence of current hepatitis B or C infection. Creatine kinase >3 times the upper limit of normal. Estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman or with childbearing potential without appropriate contraception.

Male participant with a female partner of childbearing potential not protected by a highly-effective method(s) of birth control.

Participants eligible for enrollment into an ongoing clinical study of alirocumab conducted at the same investigational site.

Hypersensitivity to alirocumab or any of the excipients.

The above information was not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Treatment and study plan

alirocumab SAR236553 (REGN727)

Drug

Pharmaceutical form:solution Route of administration: subcutaneous

Other names: Praluent®

placebo (for injection training only)

Drug

Pharmaceutical form:solution Route of administration: subcutaneous

ezetimibe

Drug

Pharmaceutical form:capsule Route of administration: oral

atorvastatin

Drug

Pharmaceutical form:tablet Route of administration: oral

Rosuvastatin

Drug

Pharmaceutical form:tablet Route of administration: oral

simvastatin

Drug

Pharmaceutical form:tablet Route of administration: oral

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Time frame: From first injection of investigational medicinal product (IMP) up to 2 weeks after last dose of study drug (Week 120)

    Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were defined as AEs that that developed or worsened or became serious during the TEAE period (time from the first injection of study drug up to the day of the last injection of study drug + 14 days). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect, was a medically important event.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change From Baseline in Calculated Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Calculated LDL-C values were obtained using the Friedewald formula. Calculated LDL-C in mg/dL from Friedewald formula (LDL cholesterol = Total cholesterol - HDL cholesterol - [Triglyceride/5]). Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment.

  2. Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    LDL-Cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Percentage of participants who reached calculated LDL-C <100 mg/dL (2.59 mmol/L) at week 12 were reported.

  3. Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    LDL-Cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Percentage of participants who reached calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) at week 12 were reported.

  4. Percentage of Participants Reaching Calculated LDL-C <70 mg/dL (1.81 mmol/L) and/or >=50% Reduction From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12

    Time frame: At Week 12

    LDL-Cholesterol was calculated using the Friedewald formula. Percentage of participants who reached LDL-C <70 mg/dL at Week 12 and/or >=50% reduction from baseline in LDL-C at Week 12 are reported.

  5. Percent Change From Baseline in Non-High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment.

  6. Percent Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Total-C) at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment.

  7. Percent Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment.

  8. Percent Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at Week 12

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

    Baseline value was defined as the last observation before the first dose of the treatment.

  9. Assessment of Participant's Acceptability of Self-Injection Using Self Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ): Feeling About Injections, Self Confidence, Satisfaction With Self-Injections

    Time frame: Baseline (Pre-SIAQ), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96

    Pre-SIAQ: self-completed before first self-injection & Post-SIAQ: self-completed after self-injection. Pre-SIAQ consisted of 7 items grouped into 3 domains:feelings about injections,self-confidence & satisfaction with self-injection. Post-SIAQ consisted of 21 items grouped into 6 domains:feelings about injections,self-image,self-confidence,injection-site reactions,ease of use & satisfaction with self-injection. Participants rated each item on 5-point (or 6-point) semantic Likert-type scale, where lower numbers indicate a worse experience. Item scores were transformed to obtain a score ranging from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience). Transformed scores for items contributing to a domain were then averaged into a domain score. Each domain score ranges from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience), higher score=better acceptability. Domain scores common to the Pre & Post SIAQ were analyzed on participants belonging to Pre & Post-SIAQ population and are reported.

  10. Assessment of Participant's Acceptability of Self-Injection Using Self Injection Assessment Questionnaire (SIAQ): Self Image, Injection-Site Reactions, Ease of Use

    Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 48, Week 72, Week 96

    SIAQ: contained 2 modules: Pre-SIAQ and Post-SIAQ. Post-SIAQ: self-completed after self-injection. Post-SIAQ consisted of 21 items grouped into 6 domains: feelings about injections, self-image, self-confidence, injection-site reactions, ease of use & satisfaction with self-injection. Participants rated each item on 5-point (or 6-point) semantic Likert-type scale, where lower numbers indicated a worse experience. Item scores were transformed to obtain a score ranging from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience) for each item. Transformed scores for items contributing to a domain were then averaged into a domain score. Each domain score ranges from 0 (worst experience) to 10 (best experience), higher score=better acceptability. Domain scores which are not in common with Pre-SIAQ were analyzed on the Post-SIAQ population and are reported here.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sanofi

Industry

Collaborators

  • Regeneron Pharmaceuticals

Registry information

Official study title

A Multi-country, Multicenter, Single-arm, Open-label Study to Document the Safety, Tolerability and Effect of Alirocumab on Atherogenic Lipoproteins in High Cardio-vascular Risk Patients With Severe Hypercholesterolemia Not Adequately Controlled With Conventional Lipid-modifying Therapies

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2019
First posted
Jun 19, 2015
Registry last updated
Mar 28, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.