Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00405587

Safety Study of PLX4032 in Patients With Solid Tumors

The primary objective of this FIH study is to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of PLX4032 in patients with solid tumors. The secondary objective is to assess the pharmacodynamic activity in paired biopsy specimens obtained from patients with malignant melanoma who have the V600E BRAF oncogenic mutation.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

Activating mutations of the BRAF gene have been observed in a variety of cancers, including 55-68% of malignant melanomas. In general, oncogenic mutations of BRAF correlate with a poor outcome. PLX4032 is a compound that selectively inhibits oncogenic B-Raf kinase.

Two extension cohorts of patients with confirmed V600E mutations will be recruited, consisting of advanced melanoma and metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Solid tumors confirmed histologically whose tumors are refractory to standard therapy, or for whom standard or curative therapy does not exist
  • Patients from whom paired melanoma biopsies are planned must have a V600E+ BRAF mutation confirmed prior to the administration of PLX4032
  • Previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to starting PLX4032 therapy, and all associated toxicity must be resolved prior to administration of PLX4032
  • Patients in the Extension cohorts (melanoma or adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum) must have both a V600E+ BRAF mutation and measurable disease (by RECIST V 1.0 criteria) prior to the administration of PLX4032. All patients enrolled must provide archival or fresh melanoma tumor biopsy for confirmation of V600E+ BRAF mutation status by TaqMan assay
  • ECOG performance status 0 or 1
  • Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
  • Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function

Exclusion criteria

  • Brain metastases that are progressing or have been documented to be stable for less than 3 months, or for which systemic corticosteroids are required
  • Investigational drug use within 28 days of the first dose of PLX4032
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
  • Refractory nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, or significant bowel resection that would preclude adequate absorption

Treatment and study plan

PLX4032

Drug

Oral capsules administered BID

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose

    AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.

  2. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose

    AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.

  3. Peak Concentration (Cmax) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8

  4. Peak Concentration (Cmax) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose on Day 15, pre-morning dose on Day 16

  5. Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8

  6. Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, pre-morning dose on Day 16

  7. AUC of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose

    AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.

  8. AUC of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose

    AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.

  9. Mean RO5185426 Accumulation Ratios - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15: pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose

    Accumulation ratio is the ratio of AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 15 / AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 1.

  10. Mean RO5185426 Accumulation Ratios - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC

    Time frame: Day 1 and Day 15: pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose

    Accumulation ratio is the ratio of AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 15 / AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 1.

  11. Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8

  12. Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16

  13. Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8

  14. Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16

  15. AUC of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose

    AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.

  16. AUC of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose

    AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.

  17. Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8

  18. Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15 and pre-morning dose on Day 16

  19. Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- CRC

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8

  20. Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- CRC

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16

  21. Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed and an Unconfirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version (v) 1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma

    Time frame: Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)

    BOR of confirmed /unconfirmed (total) response was defined as CR or PR recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v 1.0 criteria. For target lesions (TLs), CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline (BL) sum of longest diameters. For non-target lesions (NTLs), CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are first met. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.

  22. Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive CRC

    Time frame: Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)

    BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are first met Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.

  23. Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation

    Time frame: Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)

    BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.

  24. Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation

    Time frame: Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)

    BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Duration of CR or PR Using RECIST v 1.0 - Extension BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma

    Time frame: Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)

    Duration of response for participants with confirmed CR or PR was the period of time measured between the date that the criteria for objective CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) was met, and the first date that recurrent or PD was objectively documented (or death if before progression). PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s). In the event of no disease progression or documented death prior to study termination, analysis cutoff, or initiation of confounding anticancer therapy, duration of response was censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Using RECIST v 1.0 - Melanoma Extension Cohort

    Time frame: Month 1, 3, 4, 6, 9, and Last event (350) days

    PFS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the appearance of new metastatic lesions, objective tumor progression, or death if before progression. PD was defined according to the RECIST criteria (v 1.0) as increase by at least 20% in the sum of the longest diameters of each TL, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters, reported since the start of treatment, or appearance of one or more new lesions. For Non-TLs, PD was defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.

  3. PFS Using RECIST v1.0 - Extension BRAFV600E Positive Melanoma

    Time frame: Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 421 days)

    PFS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the appearance of new metastatic lesions, objective tumor progression, or death if before progression. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s). For Non-TLs, disease progression was defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. In the event of no disease progression or documented death prior to study termination, analysis cutoff, or start of confounding anticancer therapy, PFS was censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Died - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma

    Time frame: Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to 444 days

  5. Overall Survival (OS) - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma

    Time frame: Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to 444 days

    OS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the death. In the event of no death prior to study termination or analysis data cutoff, OS was censored at the last known date that the patient was alive as documented on the follow-up case report form. If this date was not available, then the last known alive date from the database was used.

  6. Time to CR or PR Using RECIST v1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma

    Time frame: Screening, BL, and up to 168 days

    Time to CR or PR was defined as the interval between the date of the first treatment to the date of the first documentation of confirmed CR or PR whichever occurred first, and not the date of confirmation at the subsequent tumor assessment. Time to response = Date of first response - initial dose date + 1.

  7. Mean Dose-Normalized Steady-State AUC of RO5185426 80 mg and 120 mg Capsules - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation and Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose

    AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.

  8. Mean Dose-Normalized Steady-State Cmax of RO5185426 80 mg and 120 mg Capsules - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation and Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1 and 15, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8, and Day 16

  9. Decrease in Tumor Uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)

    Time frame: BL and Day 15

    Tumor uptake of FDG was assessed by means of positron-emission tomography (PET)

  10. Cmax of RO5185426 - Food Effect

    Time frame: Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1 and 15, pre-morning dose on Day 2, Day 8, and Day 16

  11. Tumor Levels of Phosphorylated Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinapse (ERK), Cyclin D1, and Ki-67

    Time frame: BL and Day 15

    The immunohisto-chemical analyses of the expression of phosphorylated ERK, cyclin D1, and Ki-67 in tumor-biopsy specimens was performed using hematoxylin and eosin staining.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Plexxikon

Industry

Collaborators

  • Roche Pharma AG

Registry information

Official study title

A Study to Assess Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PLX4032 in Patients With Solid Tumors

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2016
First posted
Nov 30, 2006
Registry last updated
Aug 22, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.