SB218352_15
BiologicalNon-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 1 vaccine
NCT Number: NCT00306995
Influenza pandemics are caused by viruses that possess an Hemagglutinin molecule to which most of the population lacks immunity. If such virus is pathogenic to human and demonstrates the ability to transmit from person to person, the result is a global outbreak of disease that affects a high percentage of individuals in a short period of time and is likely to cause substantially increased mortality and morbidity in all countries of the world. Recently, purely avian influenza viruses, including the H5N1, H9N2 and H7N7 subtypes, have been directly transmitted to humans, raising concern over the possibility of a new influenza pandemic among the world's immunologically naive populations. In order to face this kind of situation, a pandemic influenza vaccine has to be developed.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
GSK Investigational Site, Finsterwalde, Brandenburg, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 1 vaccine
Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 2 vaccine
Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 3 vaccine
Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 4 vaccine
Pandemic influenza A formulation 2 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine
Pandemic influenza A formulation 3 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine
Pandemic influenza A formulation 4 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine
Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).
Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer lower than (<) 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre higher than or equal to (≥) 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer
Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 10 compared to day 0.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 compared to day 0.
Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.
Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1
Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1
Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in postvaccination titer
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
Seroconversion factor defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 42) compared to day 0.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 and Day 386 for Subset 2) compared to day 0.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)
Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.
Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)
Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.
Time frame: During the 30-days (Day 0-30) post vaccination
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.
Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 51
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).
Time frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post vaccination
Among expressed immune markers were interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).
Time frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).
Time frame: At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L). Descriptive comparison of the CMI response after Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the monovalent candidate pandemic influenza A vaccine. CMI response was determined in terms of the proportion of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ per million T cells) activated in vitro by the vaccine antigen on Days 10 and 21 after the Dose 1 and on Day 21 after Dose 2 as compared to Day 0 (pre-vaccination). The results were calculated based on the individual difference between each post-vaccination timepoint (Day 10, Day 21, Day 42) and Day 0.
Time frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
Among expressed immune markers were interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).
Time frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).
Time frame: At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination
Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L). Descriptive comparison of the CMI response after Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the monovalent candidate pandemic influenza A vaccine. CMI response was determined in terms of the proportion of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ per million T cells) activated in vitro by the vaccine antigen on Days 10 and 21 after the Dose 1 and on Day 21 after Dose 2 as compared to Day 0 (pre-vaccination). The results were calculated based on the individual difference between each post-vaccination timepoint (Day 10, Day 21, Day 42) and Day 0.
Time frame: During the 4-days post Dose 1 (Days 0-3), post Dose 2 (Days 21-24) and across these doses
Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness, swelling. Any = occurrence of any local symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain which prevents normal everyday activities. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm).
Time frame: During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)
Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness, swelling. Any = occurrence of any local symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain which prevents normal everyday activities. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm).
Time frame: During the 4-days (Day 0-3) post Dose 1
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.
Time frame: During the 4-days post Dose 2 (Days 21-24)
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.
Time frame: During the 4-Days (Day 0-3) across doses 1 and 2
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.
Time frame: During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)
Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axilar temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = fever higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.
Time frame: During the 30-days post Dose 3 (Days 189-219 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-395 for Subset 2 groups)
An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.
Time frame: Within the 365-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-364 for Subset 1 groups) and within the 395-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-394 for Subset 2 groups)
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).
Time frame: Up to 30-day post Dose 3 (Days 365-394)
A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization). Only Subset 2 groups had available data for the specified time frame.
Time frame: At Days 189 and 365
Antibody persistence was evaluated in terms of seroprotection rate (SPR) against influenza A subtype H9N2 and seroconversion rate (SCR) against influenza A subtype H9N2.
Time frame: At Days 189 and 365
SCF was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs at the post-vaccination time points compared to Day 0, for each vaccine strain.
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Phase III, Open, Randomized, Multicenter, Comparative Vaccination Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Various Formulations of a Monovalent Candidate Pandemic Influenza A Vaccine in Individuals Over 60 Years of Age
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01310413
Infections, Influenza
Paramount, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01788228
Infections, Influenza
Stockbridge, Georgia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00449670
Infections, Influenza
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT00430521
Infections, Influenza
Deggendorf, Bavaria, Germany
View Trial Details