Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00306995

Safety Study of Pandemic Candidate Influenza Vaccines in the Elderly Population

Influenza pandemics are caused by viruses that possess an Hemagglutinin molecule to which most of the population lacks immunity. If such virus is pathogenic to human and demonstrates the ability to transmit from person to person, the result is a global outbreak of disease that affects a high percentage of individuals in a short period of time and is likely to cause substantially increased mortality and morbidity in all countries of the world. Recently, purely avian influenza viruses, including the H5N1, H9N2 and H7N7 subtypes, have been directly transmitted to humans, raising concern over the possibility of a new influenza pandemic among the world's immunologically naive populations. In order to face this kind of situation, a pandemic influenza vaccine has to be developed.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

GSK Investigational Site, Finsterwalde, Brandenburg, Germany

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who the investigator believes that they can and will comply with the requirements of the protocol
  • A male or female aged over 60 years at the time of vaccination.
  • Written informed consent obtained from the subject.

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of any investigational or non-registered product (drug or vaccine) other than the study vaccine(s) within 30 days preceding the administration of the study vaccine, or planned use during the study period.
  • Participation in an earlier study with a candidate pandemic H9N2 vaccine.
  • Acute disease at the time of enrolment.
  • Acute clinically significant pulmonary, cardiovascular, hepatic or renal functional abnormality
  • History of allergic disease or reactions likely to be exacerbated by any component of the vaccine.
  • Drug and/or alcohol dependency.

Treatment and study plan

SB218352_15

Biological

Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 1 vaccine

SB218352_8

Biological

Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 2 vaccine

SB218352_4

Biological

Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 3 vaccine

SB218352_2

Biological

Non-adjuvanted pandemic influenza A formulation 4 vaccine

SB218352_8AL

Biological

Pandemic influenza A formulation 2 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine

SB218352_4AL

Biological

Pandemic influenza A formulation 3 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine

SB218352_2AL

Biological

Pandemic influenza A formulation 4 aluminium-adjuvanted vaccine

Primary outcomes

  1. Serum Haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)

    Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1

    Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).

  2. Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1

    Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).

  3. Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1

    Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer lower than (<) 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre higher than or equal to (≥) 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer

  4. Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1

    Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer

  5. Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1

    Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 10 compared to day 0.

  6. Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1

    Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 compared to day 0.

  7. Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1

    Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.

  8. Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1

    Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.

  9. Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 10 post Dose 1

    Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.

  10. Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 1

    Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.

  11. Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

    Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).

  12. Serum HI Antibody Titers Against the Influenza A Virus Strain Subtype H9N2 (Anti-H9N2)

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

    Anti-H9N2 antibody titers were expressed as Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs).

  13. Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

    Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in postvaccination titer

  14. Number of Seroconverted Subjects Against Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

    Seroconversion rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees who had a pre-vaccination HI titer < 1:10 and a post-vaccination titre ≥ 1:40, or a pre-vaccination titer ≥ 1:10 and a minimum four-fold increase in post-vaccination titer

  15. Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

    Seroconversion factor defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 42) compared to day 0.

  16. Seroconversion Factor for Influenza A Subtype H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

    Seroconversion factor was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs on day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 and Day 386 for Subset 2) compared to day 0.

  17. Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

    Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.

  18. Number of Seroprotected Subjects Against H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

    Seroprotection rate was defined as the percentage of vaccinees with a serum HI titer ≥ 1:40 after vaccination (for each vaccine strain) that usually was accepted as indicating protection.

  19. Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 2 (Day 42)

    Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.

  20. Number of Subjects With Seroprotection Power Against H9N2

    Time frame: At Day 21 post Dose 3 (Day 210 for Subset 1 groups and Day 386 for Subset 2 groups)

    Seroprotection power was defined as the proportion of subjects who were unprotected prior to the vaccination (HI titer < 1:40 on day 0) and had a protective post-vaccination titer of ≥ 1:40.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: During the 30-days (Day 0-30) post vaccination

    An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.

  2. Number of Subjects With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Time frame: From Day 0 to Day 51

    A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).

  3. Frequency of Antigen-specific Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T-cells

    Time frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post vaccination

    Among expressed immune markers were interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).

  4. Frequency of Antigen-specific CD4 T-cells

    Time frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

    Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).

  5. Cytokine-positive CD4 T-cells Frequency

    Time frame: At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

    Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L). Descriptive comparison of the CMI response after Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the monovalent candidate pandemic influenza A vaccine. CMI response was determined in terms of the proportion of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ per million T cells) activated in vitro by the vaccine antigen on Days 10 and 21 after the Dose 1 and on Day 21 after Dose 2 as compared to Day 0 (pre-vaccination). The results were calculated based on the individual difference between each post-vaccination timepoint (Day 10, Day 21, Day 42) and Day 0.

  6. Frequency of Antigen-specific Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T-cells

    Time frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

    Among expressed immune markers were interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L).

  7. Frequency of Antigen-specific CD8 T-cells

    Time frame: At Days 0, 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

    Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α).

  8. Cytokine-positive CD8 T-cells Frequency

    Time frame: At Days 10, 21 and 42 post-vaccination

    Among expressed immune markers were interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and cluster of differentiation 40 - ligand (CD40-L). Descriptive comparison of the CMI response after Dose 1 and Dose 2 of the monovalent candidate pandemic influenza A vaccine. CMI response was determined in terms of the proportion of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+ per million T cells) activated in vitro by the vaccine antigen on Days 10 and 21 after the Dose 1 and on Day 21 after Dose 2 as compared to Day 0 (pre-vaccination). The results were calculated based on the individual difference between each post-vaccination timepoint (Day 10, Day 21, Day 42) and Day 0.

  9. Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms

    Time frame: During the 4-days post Dose 1 (Days 0-3), post Dose 2 (Days 21-24) and across these doses

    Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness, swelling. Any = occurrence of any local symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain which prevents normal everyday activities. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm).

  10. Number of Subjects With Solicited Local Symptoms

    Time frame: During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)

    Assessed solicited local symptoms were pain, redness, swelling. Any = occurrence of any local symptom regardless of intensity grade. Grade 3 pain = pain which prevents normal everyday activities. Grade 3 redness/swelling = redness/swelling spreading beyond 50 millimeters (mm).

  11. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms

    Time frame: During the 4-days (Day 0-3) post Dose 1

    Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.

  12. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms

    Time frame: During the 4-days post Dose 2 (Days 21-24)

    Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.

  13. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms

    Time frame: During the 4-Days (Day 0-3) across doses 1 and 2

    Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axillary temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = axillary temperature higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.

  14. Number of Subjects With Solicited General Symptoms

    Time frame: During the 4 Days post Dose 3 (Days 189-192 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-368 for Subset 2 groups)

    Assessed solicited general symptoms were arthralgia, fatigue, fever [defined as axilar temperature higher than (≥) 37.5 degrees Celsius (°C)], headache, myalgia, shivering and sweating. Any = occurrence of any solicited general symptom regardless of intensity grade or relationship to the study vaccination. Grade 3 symptom = symptoms that prevented normal activity. Grade 3 fever = fever higher than (>) 39°C. Related symptom = symptom assessed by the investigator as being casually related to the study vaccination.

  15. Number of Subjects With Unsolicited AEs

    Time frame: During the 30-days post Dose 3 (Days 189-219 for Subset 1 groups and Days 365-395 for Subset 2 groups)

    An unsolicited AE covers any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation subject temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product and reported in addition to those solicited during the clinical study and any solicited symptom with onset outside the specified period of follow-up for solicited symptoms. Any was defined as the occurrence of any unsolicited AE regardless of intensity grade or relation to vaccination.

  16. Number of Subjects With SAEs

    Time frame: Within the 365-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-364 for Subset 1 groups) and within the 395-day post-vaccination period (Days 0-394 for Subset 2 groups)

    A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization).

  17. Number of Subjects With Any SAEs

    Time frame: Up to 30-day post Dose 3 (Days 365-394)

    A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence which resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization, resulted in permanent of serious physical disability or incapacity, caused a congenital anomaly or birth defect in the offspring of a subject or might have put the subject at risk based on medical or scientific judgment or necessitated intervention to prevent such an event (e.q. invasive or malignant cancers, intensive treatment in an emergency room or at home for bronchospasm, blood dyscrasias, or convulsion that do not resulted in hospitalization). Only Subset 2 groups had available data for the specified time frame.

  18. Number of Subjects With Antibody Persistence

    Time frame: At Days 189 and 365

    Antibody persistence was evaluated in terms of seroprotection rate (SPR) against influenza A subtype H9N2 and seroconversion rate (SCR) against influenza A subtype H9N2.

  19. Seroconversion Factor (SCF) for Influenza A Subtype H9N2.

    Time frame: At Days 189 and 365

    SCF was defined as the fold increase in serum HI GMTs at the post-vaccination time points compared to Day 0, for each vaccine strain.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III, Open, Randomized, Multicenter, Comparative Vaccination Study to Evaluate the Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity of Various Formulations of a Monovalent Candidate Pandemic Influenza A Vaccine in Individuals Over 60 Years of Age

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2006
Study completion
2006
First posted
Mar 27, 2006
Registry last updated
Feb 10, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.