arformoterol
DrugArformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution 15 mcg twice daily (BID) for a duration of one year
Other names: Brovana
NCT Number: NCT00909779
This is a multi-center study to evaluate the long-term safety of arformoterol 15 mcg twice daily (BID) in the treatment of subjects with moderate-to-severe COPD. Study participation will consist of a total of 6 visits over approximately 1 year.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me40 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Alabama Clinical Therapeutic, LLC, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
This is a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, outpatient, safety study to evaluate the long-term safety of arformoterol 15 mcg twice daily (BID) in the treatment of subjects with moderate-to-severe COPD. The administration of arformoterol in subjects with moderate to severe COPD will not result in a meaningfully greater incidence of respiratory death and COPD exacerbation -related hospitalizations compared to placebo (nebulized saline and non-long-acting beta2-agonist [LABA] COPD standard of care treatments). This study was previously posted by Sepracor Inc. In October 2009, Sepracor Inc. was acquired by Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma., and in October 2010, Sepracor Inc's name was changed to Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution 15 mcg twice daily (BID) for a duration of one year
Other names: Brovana
Placebo inhalation solution, twice daily (BID) for a duration of one year.
Time frame: 0-12 months
COPD exacerbation: an increase in COPD symptoms that necessitated any change in baseline medication (bronchodilators,anti-inflammatory agents, antibiotics, supplemental oxygen therapy, etc.).Hospitalization: any inpatient admission or any emergency department visit > 24 hours in duration. Hospice was considered hospitalization.COPD exacerbation related hospitalization: hospitalization that was due to 1) COPD exacerbation or 2) a COPD exacerbation preceded, or occurred concomitantly with the onset of, the event for which the subject was hospitalized.Respiratory-related death: For each death the Primary Investigator designated a 'probable cause', which was the primary condition that precipitated the terminal events that were the immediate cause of death. If a probable cause could not be ascertained, the cause of death was considered 'UNKNOWN'. Cause other than 'UNKNOWN' was categorized as either respiratory or non-respiratory. Deaths of 'UNKNOWN' cause were counted as primary events.
Time frame: 0-12 months
A protocol-defined exacerbation of COPD was defined as an increase in respiratory symptoms (classically, increased shortness of breath, increased sputum production, and/or increased sputum purulence) that necessitates any change in baseline medication other than bronchodilators (e.g., anti-inflammatory agents, antibiotics, supplemental oxygen therapy, etc) or causes the subject to require additional medical attention (i.e., emergency room visit or hospitalization).
Time frame: 0-12 months
Survival status at the end of the study will be determined for each subject. The proportion of subjects dead and the annual event rate will be summarized by treatment.
Time frame: 0-12 months
TEAEs were defined as: 1) adverse events that occurred on or after the date of first dose of study medication, 2) adverse events with a missing start date and a stop date on or after the date of first does of study medication, or 3) adverse events with both a missing start and stop date.
The frequency and percentage of subjects with TEAEs were summarized. At each level of summarization, a subject was counted only once for each AE he/she experienced within that level. The percentage of subjects having had at least 1 AE at each level was calculated.
Time frame: Baseline and on treatment at months 3, 6 and 12 (or early termination)
The SGRQ assessed health status and consisted of 3 component scores (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts) as well as a total score. Items were scored in accordance with the developer's guidelines. Scores were expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, where 100 represented worst possible health status and 0 indicated best possible health status. The SGRQ was assessed pre-dose at baseline, months 3, 6 and 12 or the end of study (EOS). Visit 2 was defined as baseline. A change from baseline in the Total Score of ≥ 4 units is considered the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for SGRQ.
Time frame: Baseline and on treatments at months 3, 6, 9 and 12 (or early termination)
FEV1 was measured at Visit 1 (screening), pre- and post-albuterol administration for reversibility testing, pre-dose at baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12/EOS. The best FEV1 from at least 3 acceptable maneuvers was recorded. Study baseline was defined as the Visit 2 pre-dose value. If the Visit 2 pre-dose value was missing, the last FEV1 value obtained prior to first treatment was used for baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and on treatments at months 3, 6, 9 and 12 (or early termination)
Percent predicted FEV1: measured FEV1 as a percent of the "predicted values" for the patients of similar characteristics (height, age, sex, and sometimes race and weight). Best FEV1 percent predicted was measured at Visit 1 (screening), pre-dose at baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12/EOS, as described for FEV1.
Time frame: Baseline and on treatment at months 3, 6, 9 and 12 (or early termination)
Forced Vital capacity: the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration. Best FVC was measured at Visit 1 (screening), pre-dose at baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12/EOS. The best FVC from at least 3 acceptable maneuvers was recorded.
Time frame: Baseline and on treatment at months 3, 6, 9 and 12 (or early termination)
IC: the total amount of air that can be drawn into the lungs after normal expiration.
IC was measured pre- and post-albuterol administration at Visit 1 (screening), pre-dose at baseline, months 3, 6, 9 and 12/EOS. IC maneuvers were done in triplicate. The mean of all recorded IC values was used for each subject at each time point. Study baseline was defined as the Visit 2 pre-dose value. If the Visit 2 pre-dose value was missing, the last IC value obtained prior to first treatment dose was used for baseline.
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
Industry
A Large Simple Safety Study of Arformoterol Tartrate Inhalation Solution in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05984823
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT05572333
COPD, Chronic Disease
Frankfurt, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT03641235
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT05984680
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details