Senju Investigational Site
Cypress, California, 90630, United States
NCT Number: NCT04139122
This is the first study in humans to evaluate the effectiveness of SJP-0132 in the treatment of dry eye disease. This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of single- and multiple-dose regimens of SJP-0132 in subjects with dry eye disease
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Cypress, California, 90630, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria may apply
SJP-0132 is administered as an eye drop
Placebo is administered as an eye drop
Time frame: Day 2 for cohort 1-4, Day 29 for cohort 5-6
Number of participants with adverse events by severity are summarize in each cohort. Adverse events are reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), which are defined as any event not present before exposure to the study drug or any event already presented that worsened in either intensity or frequency after exposure to the study drug.
Time frame: Day 2 for cohort 1-4, Day 29 for cohort 5-6
Clinical laboratory parameters include hematology, clinical chemistry, urinalysis, and serology. Vital signs include diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. Ophthalmologic observations include examination of visual acuity, slit lamp biomicroscopy, Schirmer I, intraocular pressure, and ophthalmoscopy.
Time frame: Day 1
The results are from the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) on Day 1. The blood for pharmacokinetics assessment was collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after dosing on Day 1 for Cohorts 1 to 4. The blood for pharmacokinetics assessment was collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing on Day 1 for Cohorts 5 and 6.
Time frame: Day 1
Area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUCs) for Cohorts 1 to 4 were calculated using the plasma collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 hours after dosing on Day 1, and those for Cohorts 5 and 6 were calculated using the plasma collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing on Day 1.
Time frame: Day 2, 4, 8
Plasma were collected at 0, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 hours after dosing on Day 1, pre-dose on Day 2, Day 4 and Day 8. Accumulation ratios calculated as (predose plasma concentration [Ctrough] on Day 4) / (Ctrough on Day 2) and (Ctrough on Day 8) / (Ctrough on Day 2)
Time frame: Day 29
Visual analog scale (VAS): "0" mean none, and "100" mean the worst imaginable for the symptom question.
Time frame: Day 29
Change from baseline of central zone CFS score at the central zone on Day 29. CFS score at the central zone ranged from 0 to 5, where '0' represents no fluorescein staining, and '5' represents severe staining on the cornea. The higher scores mean worse outcomes. Results from the study eye are reported.
Time frame: Day 29
Visual analog scale (VAS): "0" mean none, and "100" mean the worst imaginable for the symptom question. Results from pre-dose are reported.
Time frame: Day 8, 15, 22, 29
Change from baseline of CFS score at the total zone of pre-dose in each time point.
Total zone means a summary of central, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal zones.
The range of the score in each zone is 0 to 5 points, and the total score is 25 points. The higher scores mean worse outcomes.
Time frame: Day 8, 15, 22, 29
The score in each zone is 0 to 5 points, and the maximum total score is 30 points. The higher scores mean worse outcomes. Results from the study eye are reported.
Time frame: Day 8, 15, 22, 29
Lissamine green staining of the lid wiper was graded from 0 to 3. The higher scores mean worse outcomes. Results from the study eye are reported.
Time frame: Day 8, 15, 22, 29
Tear film break-up time is the time taken for the first dry spot to appear on the cornea after a complete blink.
Time frame: Day 8, 15, 22, 29
The OSDI questionnaire consists of 12 questions regarding ocular symptoms, environmental triggers, and vision-related functioning. The participant was asked to rate each question using a 5-point scale (0 to 4), where 0 = none of the time; 1 = some of the time; 2 = half of the time; 3 = most of the time; and 4 = all of the time. The total OSDI was calculated from the raw scores of each of the 12 questions based on the formula: ([sum of scores for all questions answered] X 25)/([total number of questions answered]).
The OSDI can range from 0 (normal) to 100 (abnormal).
Time frame: Day 29
The participants rated the frequency on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (constant) with which they have experienced 3 symptoms (watery eyes, discomfort and dryness). The participant was also asked to rate the intensity of discomfort and dryness on a scale of 0 (never have it) to 5 (very intense). Total DEQ-5 score was the sum of scores for frequency and intensity of dryness and discomfort plus frequency of watery eyes. Maximum score is 22.
Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: Day 29
Levels of the inflammatory marker Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) were measured in each eye using InflammaDry. The test was recorded as either positive or negative. Results from the study eye are reported.
Senju Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Industry
A Randomized, Double-Masked, Single-Center, Placebo-Controlled Single and Multiple Ascending Dose Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of SJP-0132 in Subjects With Dry Eye Disease
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04030962
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndrome
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07238699
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT07025811
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
Newport Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07128628
Dry Eye Disease, Dry Eye Syndromes
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details