Radiotherapy Unit Ausl Irccs Reggio Emilia
Reggio Emilia, 42123, Italy
NCT Number: NCT04610229
Relapsed GBMs have a life expectancy of a few months and re-radiation has proven to be safe in terms of toxicity and effective in increasing OS. One of our studies [Ciammella P, 2013, 8:222] reported a median survival of 9.5 months in patients with recurrent GBM and treated with stereotactic radiotherapy with a total dose of 25 Gy in 5 consecutive sessions, in which the dose was prescribed to 70% isodose with a homogeneous gradient towards the center of the target volume. The identification with functional imaging of specific areas with higher tumor cell density, and the possibility of delivering precisely, thanks to the most advanced therapy units, different doses to the different sub-volumes, can lead to an increase in the maximum dose that can be delivered at the expense of the most aggressive areas (with a greater effect on the tumor), compared to smaller doses in areas with lower signal alteration. This selectivity of the doses should allow an increase in the efficacy of the therapy and therefore a hypothetical increase in local control, compared to a radio-induced toxicity on the surrounding healthy tissues almost comparable to that achieved with the previous hypofractionated treatments [Ciammella P, 2013]. In fact, delivering many high doses to the entire volume would result in an excess of radio-induced necrosis within the irradiated regions with high dose, as well as the impossibility of minimizing the doses on healthy areas and / or on non-neoplastic critical areas keeping them at internal dose ranges related to minimal and acceptable toxicity levels. Since there are no studies providing clear indications on the acute and late toxicity of irradiated healthy tissues that have already been the subject of a first course of radiotherapy (STUPP), the choice of safety is the primary objective of the study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Reggio Emilia, 42123, Italy
It is an exploratory, prospective, experimental, monocentric study. Having identified a main safety endpoint (toxicity of radiotherapy treatment) and in the absence of data currently available from previous studies and useful for sizing the sample, the sample is defined according to opportunity and feasibility criteria, (12 cases), with a drawing (3 cases + 3 cases + 6 cases) which provides for two intermediate safety assessment steps one month after the end of the third and sixth patient treatment. The study will be continued only in case of positive evaluation of both steps. For each individual patient the treatment is considered completed if: a) the experimental radiotherapy treatment has been completed; b) the first follow-up radiological assessment (NMR) was performed; c) the study treatment was prematurely interrupted due to lack of efficacy (documented disease progression) or unacceptable toxicity.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
relapsed GBM after standard surgery-radio-chemotherapy treatment or other therapeutic lines or GBM secondary to anaplastic astrocytomas previously treated with RT and chemotherapy or recurrent anaplastic astrocytomas
Exclusion criteria
Patients with KPS <70%.
1
Time frame: 3 months
Evaluation of side effects in order to assess the risk / benefit ratio. Values greater than G3 according to the CTCAE v.4.0 scale will be considered adverse events.
Time frame: 3 months
Evaluation of the response rate according to the RANO criteria
Time frame: 3 months
Incidence of treatment-related radionecrosis measured with advanced magnetic resonance sequences.
Time frame: 3 months
Evaluation of survival in retreated patients
Time frame: 3 months
Health related QOL (HRQOL) evaluations using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3) questionnaire. Raw scores will be transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 to 100 (according to the standard EORTC) with a higher score representing a higher level for functioning or higher livel of symptomatology or problems.
[N.W.Scott et al, Qual Life, 2009, 18:381-388]
Time frame: 3 months
Brain cancer specific QOL evaluated by using the EORTC QLQ - BN20 questionnaire. Raw scores will be transformed to a linear scale ranging from 0 to 100 (according to the standard EORTC) with a higher score representing a higher level for functioning or higher livel of symptomatology or problems.
[MJB Taphoorn et al, EJC, 2010, 46:1033-1040]
Time frame: 3 months
Evaluation of disease progression in retreated patients
Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
Other Gov
Safety of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy Treatment With Inhomogeneous Dose Distribution in Patients With Relapsed High-grade Gliomas.
Acronym: GLIORAD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04446416
Astrocytoma, Brain Diseases
Taoyuan City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT02010606
Astrocytoma, Brain Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03626896
Astrocytoma, Brain Diseases
Taoyuan City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT03075514
Astrocytoma, Glioblastoma
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
View Trial Details