Apixaban-PK Trial: Preventing Portal Hypertension Complications in Cirrhosis
NCT07521332
Ascites, Brain Diseases
Hyderābād, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT06549673
This multicentre, prospective cohort study aims to enrol 375 patients with cirrhosis who meet the following criteria:
1. effective management or elimination of the primary aetiological factor (i.e., sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C, complete viral suppression in chronic hepatitis B, or long-term alcohol abstinence in alcohol-related liver disease), 2. liver stiffness measurements under 25 kPa, and 3. absence of varices as confirmed by endoscopy
Following the cessation of non-selective beta-blockers, patients will undergo a follow-up endoscopy at the one-year mark. The study's primary endpoint is recurrent varices in 1 year. Success will be defined as the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for recurrent varices being <5%. Should this criterion be met, the study will extend to predefined analyses of variceal haemorrhage and hepatic decompensation at 3-and 10-year intervals (funded through local resources; the General Research Fund will cover patient recruitment costs for 1 year). Clinical assessments, laboratory tests, liver and spleen stiffness measurements will be performed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months to identify potential predictors of variceal recurrence and assess the feasibility of early identification.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
1.1 Significance of cirrhosis and portal hypertension
Liver cirrhosis is the common final pathway of various chronic liver diseases. Globally, mortality due to cirrhosis have risen from 899 000 in 1990 to 1.32 million deaths in 2017. Additionally, as of 2017, 112 million and 10.6 million people were living with compensated and decompensated cirrhosis, respectively. Portal hypertension stands out as the primary cause of cirrhotic complications, such as ascites and variceal haemorrhage. Accurate diagnosis of clinically significant portal hypertension is crucial because the administration of non-selective beta-blockers (NSBBs) can reduce the risk of variceal haemorrhage and hepatic decompensation.
Chronic liver disease is highly prevalent in Hong Kong. A community screening study in Hong Kong in 2015-2016 indicated that the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen was still 7.8%. Studies by our group have further highlighted the extent of the problem, revealing that 26% of the local population and a staggering 73% of patients with type 2 diabetes suffer from metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. These chronic liver diseases carry a significant risk of progressing to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation.
1.2 Non-invasive assessment of portal hypertension
Historically, the gold standard for assessing portal hypertension requires the measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient, an invasive procedure rarely performed outside research settings. However, accumulating data support the use of non-invasive tests to assess portal hypertension. Specifically, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) through vibration-controlled transient elastography reflects the degree of liver fibrosis and the severity of cirrhosis. Furthermore, the platelet count reflects whether a patient with cirrhosis has hypersplenism secondary to portal hypertension. Additionally, spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) may be an even more direct evaluation of portal hypertension and has been used to ascertain improvements in portal hypertension following the initiation of NSBB. Based on existing data, the latest Baveno VII consensus has endorsed the use of these non-invasive tests to rule out (if LSM <15 kPa and platelet count >150×10e9/L) and to confirm (if LSM ≥25 kPa) the presence of clinically significant portal hypertension.
In a randomised controlled trial involving 548 patients with radiological cirrhosis, our group demonstrated that LSM+SSM was non-inferior to routine endoscopy in detecting varices and preventing future variceal haemorrhage. Furthermore, we validated the use of LSM-based criteria for excluding the presence of varices requiring treatment across a range of chronic liver diseases, including patients with or without hepatocellular carcinoma. Additionally, we reported the natural history of patients falling within the grey zone according to the Baveno VII criteria. Importantly, we identified factors associated with hepatic decompensation in this specific patient population.
1.3 Emerging concept: hepatic recompensation and reversal of cirrhosis and portal hypertension
As a number of chronic liver diseases can now be well controlled or cured, it is increasingly apparent that cirrhosis can resolve over time when the primary aetiology is controlled. Reports have also emerged, suggesting an improvement in portal hypertension and even hepatic recompensation in such circumstances. This has led to the practical recommendation on discontinuing NSBB in patients with LSM <25 kPa after removal or suppression of the primary aetiological factor, in the absence of varices. Removal or suppression of the primary aetiological factor includes sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C, complete hepatitis B virus DNA suppression in chronic hepatitis B patients, and long-term abstinence from alcohol in those with alcohol-related liver disease. Nonetheless, it is crucial to note that these recommendations are based on tenuous evidence (C.2 recommendation). While cessation of NSBB in patients no longer requiring it can reduce unnecessary expenses (prescription and monitoring) and side effects, it remains imperative to confirm the safety of this approach through well-designed, prospective studies.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 1 year
Upper endoscopy will be repeated to detect recurrent varices after stopping non-selective beta-blockers
Time frame: Baseline
In the initial screening cohort of all patients who undergo endoscopy, we will calculate the proportion and 95% CI of patients with LSM <25 kPa who still harbour varices at baseline despite NSBB treatment and removal or suppression of the primary aetiological factor.
Time frame: 5 years
For patients discontinuing NSBB, the secondary endpoint is resumption of NSBB or variceal haemorrhage during follow-up.
Time frame: 5 years
Other decompensating events include ascites and hepatic encephalopathy post-NSBB cessation, and the statistical methods used will be similar to those for variceal haemorrhage.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Angel Chim, MSc
CONTACT
Vincent Wong, MD
CONTACT
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Other
Assessing the Safety of Discontinuing Non-selective Beta-blockers in Cirrhotic Patients With Managed Primary Aetiological Factors According to Baveno VII Consensus
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07521332
Ascites, Brain Diseases
Hyderābād, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT03438916
Cirrhosis, Digestive System Diseases
Hvidovre, Denmark
View Trial DetailsNCT01851252
Bleeding, Chronic Liver Disease
Haifa, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT01551966
Cirrhosis, Digestive System Diseases
Bordeaux, France
View Trial Details