Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in both China and the world. In recent years, neoadjuvant immunotherapy has achieved breakthrough advancements in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Evidence from multiple Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs), such as CheckMate 816, KEYNOTE-671, and AEGEAN, has demonstrated clear benefits of this therapy in improving survival. However, these studies exhibited several limitations: first, stringent selection criteria resulting in limited heterogeneity among participants challenge the generalizability of their conclusions; Second, some studies and clinical observations have preliminarily suggested that neoadjuvant immunotherapy may increase technical surgical difficulty; however, large-sample, real-world data on its perioperative safety remain limited; third, clinical practice involves numerous borderline resectable and unresectable cases, leading to highly complex treatment decisions (such as timing of surgical intervention after conversion therapy, radiotherapy strategies, etc.), with none of the existing guidelines reach clear consensus.
This study employs a multicenter real-world design, establishing a retrospective cohort covering from neoadjuvant/induction therapy period to the surveillance period. It evaluates the safety, efficacy, and survival outcomes of neoadjuvant/induction immunotherapy across diverse treatment strategies including both surgery and radiotherapy, providing real-world evidence to inform clinical decision-making.