Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01874145

Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate

This is an open-label, randomized, multi-center, parallel-arm study to assess the safety and tolerability of a daily dose of Glatiramer Acetate (GA) 40 mg/mL three times a week (TIW) administered subcutaneously (SC) as compared to GA 20 mg/mL every day (QD) administered SC.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Teva Investigational Site 10706, Cullman, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study will comprise of a Core study and an Extension phase. During the Core study, subjects will be evaluated at study sites for 5 scheduled visits at Months: -1 (Screening), 0 (Baseline), 1, 2, and 4 (Termination/Early Termination). Subjects who complete all scheduled visits will have final procedures and assessments performed at the final visit (Month 4, Termination visit). Subjects who withdraw from the study before completing the 4 months evaluation period will have Early Termination (ET) procedures and assessments performed at their final visit.

During the Extension phase, all subjects will be offered to continue treatment with GA 40 mg/mL TIW. Subjects will be evaluated every 4 months until this dose strength is commercially available for the treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) patients or until the development of this GA dose regimen is stopped by the Sponsor, the last visit of this phase will be called Termination/ET-Extension visit.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men or women at least 18 years of age or older
  • Subjects must have a confirmed and documented RRMS diagnosis as defined by the Revised McDonald criteria, with relapse onset disease or a relapsing-remitting disease course
  • Subjects must be ambulatory with a Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 0-5.5 in both the Screening and Baseline visits.
  • Subjects must be in a stable neurological condition, relapse-free and free of any corticosteroid treatment [intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and/or per os (PO)] or adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), 60 days prior to randomization.
  • Subjects must be treated with Glatiramer Acetate (GA) 20mg/mL QD SC injection for a minimum of 6 months prior to screening.
  • Women of child-bearing potential must practice an acceptable method of birth control [acceptable methods of birth control in this study include: surgical sterilization, intrauterine devices, oral contraceptives, contraceptive patch, long-acting injectable contraceptive, partner's vasectomy or a double-barrier method (condom or diaphragm with spermicide)].
  • Subjects must be able to sign and date a written informed consent prior to entering the study.
  • Subjects must be willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Subject has any contraindication to Glatiramer Acetate therapy
  • Subjects with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS).
  • Subjects with Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO).
  • Use of experimental or investigational drugs, and/or participation in drug clinical studies within the 6 months prior to screening.
  • Concomitant use of other disease modifying drug for MS ((Fingolimod (Gilenya®), dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera®), Teriflunomide (Aubagio®) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)) within 6 months prior to screening
  • Previous use of mitoxantrone, cladribine, alemtuzumab, rituximab, natalizumab.
  • Chronic (more than 30 consecutive days) systemic (IV, PO or IM) corticosteroid treatment within 6 months prior to screening visit.
  • Previous total body irradiation or total lymphoid irradiation.
  • Previous stem-cell treatment, autologous bone marrow transplantation or allogenic bone marrow transplantation.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Subjects with a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that would preclude safe and complete study participation, as determined by medical history, physical exams, ECG and abnormal laboratory tests. Such conditions may include hepatic, renal or metabolic diseases, systemic disease, acute infection, current malignancy or recent history (5 years) of malignancy, major psychiatric disorder, history of drug and/or alcohol abuse and allergies that could be detrimental according to the investigator's judgment.
  • Subjects who underwent endovascular treatment for Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI).
  • Employees of the clinical study site or any other individuals involved with the conduct of the study, or immediate family members of such individuals -

Treatment and study plan

GA 20 mg/mL

Drug

Glatiramer acetate (GA) 20 mg/mL subcutaneous (SC) injection, the commercial product, is a single-use pre-filled syringe (PFS) containing 1.0 ml of a clear, colorless to slightly yellow, sterile, non-pyrogenic solution.

Other names: Glatiramer Acetate, Copaxone®

GA 40 mg/mL

Drug

Glatiramer acetate (GA) 40 mg/mL subcutaneous (SC) injection, is a single-use pre-filled syringe (PFS) containing 1.0 ml of a clear, colorless to slightly yellow, sterile, non-pyrogenic solution.

Other names: Glatiramer Acetate, Copaxone®

Primary outcomes

  1. Adjusted Mean Estimates for Injection-Related Adverse Event Rate Per Year in the Core Period

    Time frame: Day 1 to Month 4

    Injection-related (IR) adverse events refers to all local injection site reactions and/or symptoms or events related to immediate post injection reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety, dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria). Rate was calculated as # IR events/the total exposure to study drug in years.

    For cases in which more than 1 IR adverse event started on the same date for the same patient, these were counted as 1 IR adverse event for that patient.

    Parameter statistics were generated from a Poisson regression model with natural log of treatment duration (years) as an offset variable, and adjusted for baseline EDSS score, treatment group, age, sex, number of relapses in the 2 years prior to screening, in which a contrast comparing treatment groups were constructed. Adjusted mean estimates were adjusted estimates of event rates within treatment group.

  2. Injection-Related Adverse Event Rate Per Year in the Extension Period

    Time frame: Month 5 up to Month 10

    Injection-related (IR) adverse events refers to all local injection site reactions and/or symptoms or events related to immediate post injection reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety, dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria). Rate was calculated as # IR events/the total exposure to study drug in years.

    For cases in which more than 1 IR adverse event started on the same date for the same patient, these were counted as 1 IR adverse event for that patient.

  3. Injection-Related Adverse Events in the Extension Period

    Time frame: Month 5 up to Month 10

    Injection-related (IR) adverse events refers to all local injection site reactions and/or symptoms or events related to immediate post injection reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety, dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Adjusted Mean Estimates for Injection Site Reaction Event Rate Per Year in the Core Period

    Time frame: Day 1 to Month 4

    This outcome includes injection-related adverse events referring to all local injection site reactions (ISR). Rate was calculated as # ISR events/the total exposure to study drug in years.

    For cases in which more than 1 ISR adverse event started on the same date for the same patient, these were counted as 1 ISR adverse event for that patient.

    Parameter statistics were generated from a Poisson regression model with natural log of treatment duration (years) as an offset variable, and adjusted for baseline EDSS score, treatment group, age, sex, number of relapses in the 2 years prior to screening, in which a contrast comparing treatment groups were constructed. Adjusted mean estimates were adjusted estimates of event rates within treatment group.

  2. Change From Baseline to Month 4 in in the Adjusted Mean Participant-Reported Impact on Physical Wellbeing Using Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 PRO) in the Core Period

    Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 4 (or early termination visit)

    The physical wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 is comprised of 20 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 20-100. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in physical wellbeing over time.

    The estimated change from baseline to month 4 adjusted for months 1 and 2 was generated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis adjusted for baseline MSIS-29 physical score, treatment group, month, treatment by month interaction.

  3. Change From Baseline to Month 4 in in the Adjusted Mean Participant-Reported Impact on Psychological Wellbeing Using Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 PRO) in the Core Period

    Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2 4 (or early termination visit)

    The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 is comprised of 9 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 9-45. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in psychological wellbeing over time.

    The estimated change from baseline to month 4 adjusted for months 1 and 2 was generated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis adjusted for baseline MSIS-29 psychological score, treatment group, month, treatment by month interaction.

  4. Change From Baseline to Month 4 in in the Adjusted Mean Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) Convenience Score in the Core Period

    Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2 4 (or early termination visit)

    The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) is a psychometric measure of a patient's satisfaction with medication. It consists of 3 subscales: effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain, i.e. 1 to 3 for effectiveness, 4 - 6 for convenience and 7 to 9 for global satisfaction. This outcome focuses on convenience items 4-6, with each question graded on a scale of 1 (extreme dissatisfaction) to 7 (extreme satisfaction). TSQM-9 participant perception of convenience score was calculated as: ([sum (Item 4 to Item 6) - 3] divided by 18) * 100. The full range was -100 to 100, with positive change from baseline indicating improvement.

    The estimated change from baseline to month 4 adjusted for months 1 and 2 was generated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis adjusted for baseline TSQM convenience score, treatment group, month, treatment by month interaction.

  5. Change From Baseline to Month 4 in in the Adjusted Mean Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) Satisfaction Score in the Core Period

    Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2 4 (or early termination visit)

    The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) is a psychometric measure of a patient's satisfaction with medication. It consists of 3 subscales: effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain, i.e. 1 to 3 for effectiveness, 4 - 6 for convenience and 7 to 9 for global satisfaction. This outcome focuses on global satisfaction, items 7-9. TSQM-9 participant perception of satisfaction score was calculated as: ([sum(Item 7 to Item 9) - 3] divided by 14) * 100. The full range was -100 to 100, with positive change from baseline indicating improvement satisfaction with medication.

    The estimated change from baseline to month 4 adjusted for months 1 and 2 was generated using a mixed model repeated measures analysis adjusted for baseline TSQM convenience score, treatment group, month, treatment by month interaction.

  6. Injection Site Reaction Event Rate Per Year in the Extension Period

    Time frame: Month 5 up to Month 10

    This outcome includes injection-related adverse events referring to all local injection site reactions (ISR). Rate was calculated as # ISR events/the total exposure to study drug in years.

    For cases in which more than 1 ISR adverse event started on the same date for the same patient, these were counted as 1 ISR adverse event for that patient.

  7. Injection Site Reaction Events in the Extension Period

    Time frame: Month 5 up to Month 10

    This outcome includes injection-related adverse events referring to all local injection site reactions (ISR).

    For cases in which more than 1 ISR adverse event started on the same date for the same patient, these were counted as 1 ISR adverse event for that patient.

  8. Change From Start of Extension Period (Month 4) to Month 8 (and to Endpoint Visit) in the Participant-Reported Impact on Physical Wellbeing Using Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 PRO)

    Time frame: Month 4 (baseline for extension period), Month 8, endpoint visit

    The physical wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 is comprised of 20 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 20-100. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in physical wellbeing.

    The Extension Period endpoint visit was defined as the last observed post-baseline data of the Extension Period.

  9. Change From Start of Extension Period (Month 4) to Month 8 (and to Endpoint Visit) in the Participant-Reported Impact on Psychological Wellbeing Using Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29 PRO)

    Time frame: Month 4 (baseline for extension period), Month 8, endpoint visit

    The psychological wellbeing assessment portion of the MSIS-29 is comprised of 9 questions in which participants rate the impact of MS on their day-to-day life during the past two weeks from 1=no impact to 5=extreme impact for a total score of 9-45. Negative change from baseline scores indicate improvement in psychological wellbeing.

    The Extension Period endpoint visit was defined as the last observed post-baseline data of the Extension Period.

  10. Change From Start of Extension Period to Month 8 (and to Endpoint Visit) in in the Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) Convenience Score

    Time frame: Month 4 (baseline for extension period), Month 8, endpoint visit

    The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) is a psychometric measure of a patient's satisfaction with medication. It consists of 3 subscales: effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain, i.e. 1 to 3 for effectiveness, 4 - 6 for convenience and 7 to 9 for global satisfaction. This outcome focuses on convenience items 4-6, with each question graded on a scale of 1 (extreme dissatisfaction) to 7 (extreme satisfaction). TSQM-9 participant perception of convenience score was calculated as: ([sum (Item 4 to Item 6) - 3] divided by 18) * 100. The full range was -100 to 100, with positive change from baseline indicating improvement.

    The Extension Period endpoint visit was defined as the last observed post-baseline data of the Extension Period.

  11. Change From Start of Extension Period to Month 8 (and to Endpoint Visit) in in the Participant-Reported Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) Satisfaction Score

    Time frame: Month 4 (baseline for extension period), Month 8, endpoint visit

    The Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) is a psychometric measure of a patient's satisfaction with medication. It consists of 3 subscales: effectiveness, convenience and global satisfaction. The scores were computed by adding items for each domain, i.e. 1 to 3 for effectiveness, 4 - 6 for convenience and 7 to 9 for global satisfaction. This outcome focuses on global satisfaction, items 7-9. TSQM-9 participant perception of satisfaction score was calculated as: ([sum(Item 7 to Item 9) - 3] divided by 14) * 100. The full range was -100 to 100, with positive change from baseline indicating improvement satisfaction with medication.

    The Extension Period endpoint visit was defined as the last observed post-baseline data of the Extension Period.

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events Other Than Injection Related Reactions During the Core Period and the Extension Period

    Time frame: Day 1 to Month 4 (core period); Month 5 to 10 (extension period)

    An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient that developed or worsened in severity during the conduct of the clinical study of a pharmaceutical product and did not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. This outcome summarizes the % of participants who had AEs other than injection related reactions. Injection-related (IR) adverse events referring to all local injection site reactions and/or symptoms or events related to immediate post injection reaction (flushing, chest pain, palpitations, anxiety, dyspnea, throat constriction, and/or urticaria).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Open-Label, Randomized, Multi-Center, Parallel-Arm Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate 40 mg/mL Three Times a Week Compared to 20 mg/mL Daily Subcutaneous Injections in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Acronym: GLACIER

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jun 10, 2013
Registry last updated
Jan 14, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.