FluBlok Influenza Vaccination
Biological0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Other names: FluBlok, rHA, rHA0, recombinant hemagglutinin
NCT Number: NCT00539864
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the safety, reactogenicity, immunogenicity, relative efficacy and effectiveness of FluBlok to a licensed trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV)in healthy adults age 50-64 years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–64 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Kaiser Permanente Pediatric Clinic - Fresno, Fresno, California, United States
Annual influenza epidemics are associated with serious excess morbidity and mortality, particularly among the elderly. Licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIVs) have been shown to reduce hospitalization and death following influenza in this vulnerable population, but their efficacy is lower than that observed in younger, healthy populations. In addition, recent studies have questioned the level of effectiveness of TIV in the elderly, suggesting that cohort studies have overestimated the benefits of immunization with current TIV formulations in this age group. In view of these considerations, it is widely accepted that improved and alternative vaccines are needed for control of seasonal and pandemic influenza.
Currently available TIVs are prepared from viruses that are grown in embryonated hens' eggs. Alternative substrates for vaccine production are desirable in order to reduce the vulnerability of and to expand influenza vaccine supply. Recombinant DNA techniques allow for expression of the influenza hemagglutinin (rHA) by baculovirus vectors in insect cell cultures. Advantages of this technique include speed of production, absence of egg protein, and a highly purified product. Previous studies among healthy younger and older adults have confirmed that rHA vaccines are safe, well tolerated and immunogenic at dosages up to nine times higher than those contained in TIV. Dose-related increases in serum antibody levels after immunization also were observed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Other names: FluBlok, rHA, rHA0, recombinant hemagglutinin
0.5mL dose for intramuscular injection
Other names: Fluzone, TIV
Time frame: Reactogenicity days 0-7 following immunization; other AEs days 0-28 following immunization
Solicited reactogenicity events included injection site pain, bruising, erythema and swelling. Solicited systemic AEs included fatigue, chills, arthralgias, myalgias, headache and nausea.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 28
Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring the difference in values in Hemagglutination-Inhibition Assay (HAI) titers in participants from Day 0 to Day 28, using Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs). The GMTs from the FluBlok and TIV groups were then compared.
Time frame: Day 28 following immunization at Day 0
Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to a 4-fold rise in Hemagglutination-Inhibition Assay (HAI) titer over Day 0 at Day 28 following immunization
Time frame: Day 28 following immunization at Day 0
Percentage of participants with (HAI titer greater than or equal to 40) at Day 28
Protein Sciences Corporation
Industry
Evaluation of Safety and Reactogenicity of FluBlok, Trivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine, and Comparison of the Immunogenicity, Efficacy and Effectiveness of FluBlok to a Licensed Egg-Grown Influenza Vaccine in Adults Aged 50 to 64
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04794829
COVID-19, Coronaviridae Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07737106
Infections, Influenza
Bayan Nur, Inner Mongolia, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06518577
Infections, Influenza
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06560151
Infections, Influenza
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
View Trial Details