GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 14050, Germany
NCT Number: NCT02639351
Dosage-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Aluminium Hydroxide/LHD153R Adjuvanted Meningococcal C-CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Adults (18-45 years of age).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–45 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Berlin, 14050, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intramuscular (IM) vaccination of 1 dose of 0.5 mL
IM vaccination of 1 dose of 0.5 mL
IM vaccination of 1 dose of 0.5 mL
IM vaccination of 1 dose of 0.5 mL
IM vaccination of 1 dose of 0.5 mL
Time frame: Within 30 minutes of vaccination (Min) at Day 1
Assessed solicited local symptoms were injection site erythema, induration, pain and swelling. Any erythema/induration/swelling = erythema/induration/swelling spreading beyond 25 millimeters (mm) of injection site. Any pain = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Assessed solicited systemic symptoms were arthralgia, chills, diarrhea, fatigue, fever defined as body temperature greater than or equal to (≥) 38 degrees Celsius (°C), as measured orally, headache, loss of appetite, myalgia, nausea, rash, urticaria and vomiting. Any systemic symptom = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade.
Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 4 (excluding 30 minutes immediately after vaccination)
Assessed solicited local symptoms were injection site erythema, induration, pain and swelling. Any erythema/induration/swelling = erythema/induration/swelling spreading beyond 25 mm of injection site. Any pain = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Assessed solicited systemic symptoms were arthralgia, chills, diarrhea, fatigue, fever defined as body temperature ≥ 38 °C, as measured orally, headache, loss of appetite, myalgia, nausea, rash, urticaria and vomiting. Any systemic symptom = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Other solicited data included: Analgesic/Antipyretics Use.
Time frame: From Day 5 to Day 8
Assessed solicited local symptoms were injection site erythema, induration, pain and swelling. Any erythema/induration/swelling = erythema/induration/swelling spreading beyond 25 mm of injection site. Any pain = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Assessed solicited systemic symptoms were arthralgia, chills, diarrhea, fatigue, fever defined as body temperature ≥ 38 °C, as measured orally, headache, loss of appetite, myalgia, nausea, rash, urticaria and vomiting. Any systemic symptom = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade.
Time frame: From Day 8 to Day 14
Assessed solicited local symptoms were injection site erythema, induration, pain and swelling. Any erythema/induration/swelling = erythema/induration/swelling spreading beyond 25 mm of injection site. Any pain = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Assessed solicited systemic symptoms were arthralgia, chills, diarrhea, fatigue, fever defined as body temperature ≥ 38 °C, as measured orally, headache, loss of appetite, myalgia, nausea, rash, urticaria and vomiting. Any systemic symptom = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Other solicited data included: Analgesic/Antipyretics Use.
Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 8 (excluding 30 minutes immediately after vaccination)
Assessed solicited local symptoms were injection site erythema, induration, pain and swelling. Any erythema/induration/swelling = erythema/induration/swelling spreading beyond 25 mm of injection site. Any pain = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Assessed solicited systemic symptoms were arthralgia, chills, diarrhea, fatigue, fever defined as body temperature ≥ 38 °C, as measured orally, headache, loss of appetite, myalgia, nausea, rash, urticaria and vomiting. Any systemic symptom = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Other solicited data included: Analgesic/Antipyretics Use.
Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 14 (excluding 30 minutes immediately after any vaccination)
Assessed solicited local symptoms were injection site erythema, induration, pain and swelling. Any erythema/induration/swelling = erythema/induration/swelling spreading beyond 25 mm of injection site. Any pain = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Assessed solicited systemic symptoms were arthralgia, chills, diarrhea, fatigue, fever defined as body temperature ≥ 38 °C, as measured orally, headache, loss of appetite, myalgia, nausea, rash, urticaria and vomiting. Any systemic symptom = occurrence of the symptom regardless of intensity grade. Other solicited data included: Analgesic/Antipyretics Use.
Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 29
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product at any dose that does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. Therefore, an AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of an investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product. This definition includes intercurrent illnesses or injuries and exacerbation of pre-existing conditions. Unsolicited adverse event were defined as symptoms that were not solicited using a Subject Diary and that were spontaneously communicated by a subject who has signed the informed consent. Unsolicited AEs were collected through the Day 29 visit and the analysis was performed for Day 1-29 time frame, instead of Day 1-14 as required by protocol.
Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 366
SAEs are untoward medical occurrences that at any dose resulted in death,was life-threatening,required/prolonged hospitalization,persistent/significant disability/incapacity,congenital anomaly/in important & significant medical event that could jeopardize the subject/could required intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes mentioned above.MAAEs are AEs that lead to a visit to a healthcare provider.NOCDs are adverse events that represent new diagnosis of a chronic medical condition that was not present/suspected in a subject prior to study enrolment.AESIs were defined according to MedDRA preferred terms.Certain AESIs are monitored after administration of immunostimulatory agents.These are pre-defined & include AEs in the SOCs of Gastrointestinal disorders,Liver disorders,Metabolic diseases,Musculo-skeletal disorders,Neuroinflammatory disorders,Skin disorders,Vasculitides & others.
Time frame: From Day 1 to Day 29
SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or in an important and significant medical event that could jeopardize the subject or could requiered intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes mentioned above. MAAEs were defined as an AE that lead to a visit to a healthcare provider. NOCDs were defined as AEs leading to study or vaccine withdrawal. AESIs were defined according to MedDRA preferred terms.Certain AEs of special interest (AESIs) are monitored after the administration of immunostimulatory agents. These are pre-defined and include AEs in the SOCs of Gastrointestinal disorders, Liver disorders, Metabolic diseases, Musculo-skeletal disorders, Neuroinflammatory disorders, Skin disorders, Vasculitides and others
Time frame: From Day 29 up to study end (Day 366)
SAEs were defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, was life-threatening, required or prolonged hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly or in an important and significant medical event that could jeopardize the subject or could requiered intervention to prevent one of the other outcomes mentioned above. MAAEs were defined as an AE that lead to a visit to a healthcare provider. NOCDs were defined as AEs leading to study or vaccine withdrawal. AESIs were defined according to MedDRA preferred terms.Certain AEs of special interest (AESIs) are monitored after the administration of immunostimulatory agents. These are pre-defined and include AEs in the SOCs of Gastroin-testinal disorders, Liver disorders, Metabolic diseases, Musculo-skeletal disorders, Neuroinflammatory disorders, Skin disorders, Vasculitides and others
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameters: Na, K, Cl, BUN and bicarbonate in millimoles per liter (mmol/L).
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameters: Na, K, Cl, BUN and bicarbonate in mmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameters: Na, K, Cl, BUN and bicarbonate in mmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameters: Na, K, Cl, BUN and bicarbonate in mmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameter: Creatinine (CREA) in micro mole per liter (μmol/L)
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameter: CREA in μmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameter: CREA in μmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameter: CREA in μmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameters: ALT and AST in International Units per liter (IU/L).
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameters: ALT and AST in IU/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameters: ALT and AST in IU/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameters: ALT and AST in IU/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameter: CRP in milligram per liter (mg/L).
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameters: CRP in mg/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameter: CRP in mg/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameter: CRP in mg/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets in 10^9 cells per liter (10^9/L)
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets in 10^9/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets in 10^9/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameters: basophils, eosinophils, leukocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils and platelets in 10^9/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameter: RBC in 10^12 cells per liter (10^12/L).
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameter: RBC in 10^12/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameter: RBC in 10^12/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameter: RBC in 10^12/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameter: hematocrit in liter per liter (L/L).
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameter: hematocrit in L/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameter: hematocrit in L/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameter: hematocrit in L/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameter: HGB in gram per liter (g/L).
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameter: HGB in g/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameter: HGB in g/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on blood samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameter: HGB in g/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at Day 1 (pre-dose) for the following parameter: Urine RBC in microliters (μL).
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameter: Urine RBC in μL. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at Day 8 for the following parameter: Urine RBC in μL. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at Day 29 for the following parameter: Urine RBC in μL. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
The absolute value for urinalysis was assessed for the following parameter: urine glucose in mmol/L.
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at Day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameter: urine glucose in mmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at Day 8 (post-dose) for the following parameter: urine glucose in mmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 8 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at Day 29 (post-dose) for the following parameter: Urine glucose in mmol/L. The change was calculated as difference between the Day 1 (pre-dose) results and the Day 29 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
The absolute value for urinalysis was assessed for the following parameter: urine protein in g/L
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at day 1 (post-dose) for the following parameter: urine protein in g/L. The change was calculated as difference between the day 1 (pre-dose) results and the day 1 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 8
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at day 8 (post-dose) for the following parameter: urine protein in g/L. The change was calculated as difference between the day 1 (pre-dose) results and the day 8 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 29
Analysis was performed on urine samples collected at day 29 (post-dose) for the following parameter: urine protein in g/L. The change was calculated as difference between the day 1 (pre-dose) results and the day 29 (post-dose) results.
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
The abnormal laboratory parameters values were classified by the investigator as Normal (a value either low or high at baseline and normal post-baseline), High (a value either normal or low at baseline and high post-baseline), Low (a value either normal or high at baseline and low post-baseline) and No change.
Time frame: At Day 8
The abnormal laboratory parameters values were classified by the investigator as Normal (a value either low or high at baseline and normal post-baseline), High (a value either normal or low at baseline and high post-baseline), Low (a value either normal or high at baseline and low post-baseline) and No change.
Time frame: At Day 29
The abnormal laboratory parameters values were classified by the investigator as Normal (a value either low or high at baseline and normal post-baseline), High (a value either normal or low at baseline and high post-baseline), Low (a value either normal or high at baseline and low post-baseline) and No change.
Time frame: At Day 1 (post-dose)
The abnormal laboratory parameters values were defined following the FDA CBER Guidance for Industry "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials" dated September 2007, or the institution's normal ranges if they differ from CBER guidance
Time frame: At Day 8
The abnormal laboratory parameters values were defined following the FDA CBER Guidance for Industry "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials" dated September 2007, or the institution's normal ranges if they differ from CBER guidance
Time frame: At Day 29
The abnormal laboratory parameters values were defined following the FDA CBER Guidance for Industry "Toxicity Grading Scale for Healthy Adult and Adolescent Volunteers Enrolled in Preventive Vaccine Clinical Trials" dated September 2007, or the institution's normal ranges if they differ from CBER guidance
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose)
The antibody concentrations were assessed by hSBA directed against MenC serogroup and expressed as GMTs.
Time frame: At Day 29
The antibody concentrations were assessed by hSBA directed against MenC serogroup and expressed as GMTs.
Time frame: At Day 29
GMR of GMTs of antibodies against MenC was evaluated at Day 29 relative to Day 1 (pre-dose).
Time frame: At Day 8 and Day 181
The antibody concentrations were assessed by hSBA directed against MenC and expressed as GMTs.
Time frame: At Day 8 and Day 181
GMR of GMTs of antibodies against MenC serogroup was evaluated at Day 8 and Day 181 relative to Day 1 (pre-dose).
Time frame: At Day 8, Day 29 and Day 181
The percentage of subjects who achieved hSBA seroresponse against MenC serogroup was evaluated at Day 8, Day 29 and Day 181 after vaccination. Seroresponse was defined as a post vaccination hSBA ≥ 8 for subjects with a baseline hSBA lower than (<) 4 or had an increase of at least 4 times the baseline hSBA level for subjects with pre vaccination hSBA ≥ 4.
Time frame: At Day 1 (pre-dose), Day 8, Day 29 and Day 181
The antibody concentrations were assessed by ELISA and expressed as Geometric Mean Concentrations (GMCs) in microgram per mililiter (μg/mL).
Time frame: At Day 8, Day 29 and Day 181
The percentage of subjects with at least a 4-fold increase in antibody concentrations to MenC serogroup as measured by ELISA were analysed at day 8, 29 and 181 relative to Day 1 (pre-dose).
GlaxoSmithKline
Industry
A Phase 1, Randomized, Observer-Blind, Dosage-Escalation Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of an Aluminium Hydroxide/LHD153R Adjuvanted Meningococcal C-CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine Compared to Aluminium Hydroxide Adjuvanted Meningococcal C-CRM197 Conjugate Vaccine in Healthy Adults (18-45 Years of Age).
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05082285
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Santo Domingo Este, Dominican Republic
View Trial DetailsNCT03621670
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04886154
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04318548
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details