Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04257188

Safety and Feasibility of Sutureless Pars-plana Vitrectomy in Sub-Tenon Anesthesia

The aim of this prospective study is to investigate the feasibility of performing minimally invasive vitrectomy under sub-tenon anesthesia in terms of intraoperative patients' tolerance and the surgeon's confidence. In particular, the tolerance and pain sensation during the operation as well as the possible perception of light and colour sensations are to be recorded with the help of questionnaires. In addition, the surgeon's impressions regarding eye motility, chemosis and general feasibility will be evaluated.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Clinic for Ophthalmology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen

Aachen, 52066, Germany

About this study

A prospective, one-center clinical trial to identify the safety and feasibility of sutureless pars-plana vitrectomy performed in sub-tenon anesthesia.

Background:

In Germany pars-plana vitrectomies are mostly performed in general anesthesia. This requires the immediate availability of a trained anesthesiology team, which is not always granted, especially in urgent eye disease (i.e. endophthalmitis, high risk retinal detachment). Furthermore, some patients are not suitable for general anesthesia due to systemic diseases (i.e. cardio-vascular diseases). There are several procedures of local ocular anesthesia (i.e. peribulbar, retrobulbar, sub-tenon anesthesia). The main advantage of sub-tenon anesthesia is the use of a blunt cannula limiting the risk of potential complications.

Purpose:

The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety of local sub-tenon anesthesia procedure for sutureless vitrectomy (anesthetic mixture: 2ml xylocaine and 2ml bupivacaine) in a prospective clinical study design.

Objectives:

Primary outcome: The evaluation of 1. sensation of pain, 2. patients' intraoperative discomfort and 3. visual sensations using the standardized questionnaires (WONG-BAKER Faces Scale, Visual Analog Scale and individual questions).

Secondary Outcome: The evaluation of 1. chemosis, 2. eye movement, 3. surgeon's general feeling of comfort during surgery (rating scale).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 40 years
  • Presence of a clinical condition that requires surgical treatment with vitrectomy and does not necessarily require general anesthesia (retinal detachment, endophthalmitis, vitreous hemorrhage, after silicone oil surgery, vitreomacular traction, epiretinal gliosis, macular holes, subretinal bleeding, lens luxation).
  • The medical indication for vitrectomy is not linked to study participation. Not until the patient has consented to the vitrectomy (standardized information forms) potential study subjects will be approached to participate in the clinical trial.
  • Willingness to participate in the clinical trial
  • Understanding the objectives of the clinical trial and the study process
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

  • Concomitant diseases of the eye
  • State after filtering glaucoma operations
  • Distinct corneal opacities, which make the examination considerably more difficult
  • Complicated proliferative vitreoretinopathy
  • Lack of understanding of the study, its objectives and study conduct
  • Psychiatric diseases
  • Pregnancy
  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial

Treatment and study plan

minimally invasive vitrectomy under subtenon anaesthesia

Procedure

The safety and feasibility in terms of tolerance and pain sensation during the surgery as well as the possible perception of light and colour sensations in minimally invasive vitrectomy under sub-tenon anesthesia shall be investigated.

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensation of pain

    Time frame: 1 Day

    • 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' (means "no pain") to '10' (means "worst pain imaginable"), Questionnaire
    • Wong-Baker FACES® Scale (6 Faces, range no hurt - hurts worst), Questionnaire
  2. Discomfort

    Time frame: 1 Day

    11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' (means "no discomfort") to '10' (means "worst discomfort imaginable"), Questionnaire

  3. Visual Sensations

    Time frame: 1 Day

    4 questions, Likert scale ("yes", "no", "don't know/not sure"), Questionnaire

    • perception of details during surgery (instruments, surgeon's face)
    • perception of colors during surgery
    • perception of lights or shadows
    • no light perception at all during surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Chemosis

    Time frame: 1 Day

    5-point numeric scale from '0' (means no chemosis) to 4 (means chemosis of all 4 eye quadrants), Questionnaire (surgeon)

  2. Eye movement

    Time frame: 1 Day

    4-point numeric scale: '0' (means ptosis and no motility), '1' (mild motility), '2' (moderate motility), '3' (full motility), Questionnaire (surgeon)

  3. Surgeon's general feeling of comfort during the surgery

    Time frame: 1 Day

    6-point numeric scale ranges from '1' (means best comfort conditions) to '6' (means worst comfort conditions) Questionnaire (surgeon)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

RWTH Aachen University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, One-center Clinical Trial to Identify the Safety and Feasibility of Sutureless Pars-plana Vitrectomy Performed in Sub-tenon Anesthesia.

Acronym: SAFE-VISA

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2022
First posted
Feb 5, 2020
Registry last updated
May 5, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.