Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03467087

Safety and Feasibility of Electrical Muscle Stimulation During Stem Cell Transplantation or Intensive Chemotherapy

Intensive chemotherapy, with or without following autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), is often the only curative treatment option for patients with haematological malignancies, leave many survivors physically and psychologically impaired because of side effects, many caused by weeks of immobilisation. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is a proven training tool to improve physical performance in seniors and patients with chronic disease. The investigators therefore intend to evaluate the safety and feasibility of EMS in patients undergoing autologous HSCT, allogeneic HSCT and intensive chemotherapy. To assess feasibility all patients are asked to document training time during hospitalization in an EMS diary.

Furthermore, physical Performance will be measured using the 6-minute-walking distance (6MWD) and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) as well as psychological performance using the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) and EORTC QLQ-C30 at the start of chemotherapy (T1) and when patients are discharged from hospital (T2).

At the time intensive chemotherapy is started and all inclusion and no exclusion criteria are met, patients will receive an EMS device with electrodes and will be instructed on how to use the device. After that, baseline tests using the above mentioned tools will be performed.

EMS will be conducted with a "Myopuls 2000" (Curatec Services GmbH, Moers, Germany) device using 13 cm x 5 cm electrodes. Electrodes are placed subsequently on both thighs and upper arms with instructions to stimulate each limb for at least 15 minutes on at least 5 days per week. Stimulation settings were as follows: 300 µs pulse width, 60 Hz frequency, 5 seconds on, 5 seconds off. The amplitude is initially set to elicit a visible muscle contraction and patients are encouraged to increase the amplitude as much as tolerated. After an initial training session, patients are to use the devices on their own and document their activities in an EMS diary.

Patients are then asked to use EMS throughout their therapy in addition to physical therapy until the day of their discharge when the initially performed tests are repeated.

The investigators hypothesis is, that EMS can be safely applied in patients undergoing intensive chemotherapy regimens and that patients are able to administer EMS by themselfs.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 - 80 years of age
  • ECOG mperformance status 0-2
  • patients undergoing chemotherapy regimens and and expected hospitalization time of > 14 days

Exclusion criteria

  • patients with pacemakers and defibrillators
  • patients with metallic implants close to stimulation sites
  • skin irritations and injuries at the site of electrode placement
  • pregnancy
  • epilepsy
  • patient is physically or mentally unable to administer EMS by him/her -self
  • history of ventricular arrhythmias
  • peripheral arterial disease
  • deep vein thrombosis in the past 3 month
  • myocardial infarction or stroke in the past 3 month

Treatment and study plan

Myopuls 2000D

Device

Device: Myopuls 2000D (Curatec Services GmBH, 47443 Moers, Germany)

Primary outcomes

  1. Occurence of adverse events caused by EMS

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 30 days

    Possible adverse events: bleeding events (defined according to the WHO Bleeding Scale ), arrhythmias, CK elevation, skin irritation

  2. Feasibility of self administered EMS

    Time frame: At the time of discharge of every patients, after an average of 30 days

    Percentage of patients able to complete at least 2/3 of the pre-set training time

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical performance as assessed by the 6 minute walking distance

    Time frame: At the time of discharge of every patients, after an average of 30 days

    Patients were told to walk on a 40-meter floor with instructions to cover as much distance as possible in 6 minutes. Patients were allowed to stop and rest as often as necessary. Time was stopped by a technician who was also allowed to encourage participants with standardized phrases during the walk.

  2. Physical performance as assessed by the Short Physical Performance Battery

    Time frame: At the time of discharge of every patients, after an average of 30 days

    The Short Physical Performance Battery as developed by Guralnik and colleagues ranges from 0 - 12 points with 0 points indicating the worst possible performance and 12 points as best result. The battery consists of 3 objective tests of lower body function with maximally 4 points to be reached in one test:

    • A timed walk of 8 feet
    • The time it takes to rise from a chair 5 times
    • A standing balance test
  3. Psychological performance as assessed by the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory

    Time frame: At the time of discharge of every patients, after an average of 30 days

    The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI-20) consists of 5 subscales including general, physical and mental fatigue, reduced motivation and reduced activity with 20 items in total (4 items per subscale). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale (1-5) and each subscale ranges from 4 to 20. Patients were asked to fill out the test form before or within 3 days from start of treatment (timepoint 1) and at the day of discharge (timepoint 2). Contrary to physical assessment, high scores in the MFI subscales mean greater fatigue and therefore worse psychological functioning.

  4. Psychological performance as assessed by the EORTC QoL 30 questionnaire

    Time frame: At the time of discharge of every patients, after an average of 30 days

    The EORTC QOL-C30 questionnaire contains 30 items that are divided into five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / Quality of Life (QoL) scale, and six single items. Functional scales assess physical function (ability to manage daily life), role function (at work and daily activities), emotional function (tension, anxiety, irritability and depression), social function (family life or social activities) and cognitive function (concentration and memory). Symptom scales ask for fatigue, nausea or pain and single items measure dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea and financial impact. The global health status / QoL scale rates overall health and quality of life. Original data was processed according to the EORTC scoring manual into a 0- to 100-point scale. High scores in functional scales and QoL indicate adequate function and QoL. Patients with high scores on symptom scales and single items show more severe symptoms and impairments.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Saarland

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Safety and Feasibility of Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Patients Undergoing Autologous and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation or Chemotherapy Requiring Hospitalization

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Mar 15, 2018
Registry last updated
Mar 15, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.