NOVOCART® Disc plus
DrugAutologous Disc Chondrocyte Transplantation System (ADCT)
NCT Number: NCT01640457
NOVOCART® Disc plus is being investigated to explore its clinical applicability, safety and efficacy in the repair of a herniated disc with an indication for an elective sequestrectomy, and of the adjacent degenerated disc, if present. The objective of this clinical study is to provide basis for a confirmatory study design (endpoints, methodologies) (Phase II), and to develop a safety profile (Phase I). This study further aims at developing and validating known and new biologic markers for the quality and clinical efficacy of the product as requested in the context of identity, purity and potency characteristics of the medicinal/investigational product.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
University Hospital for Neurosurgery Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria
This is a classical Phase II study with an implicated Phase I part. The Phase I/II combination study is a non-confirmatory study aimed at gathering preliminary clinical information on NOVOCART® Disc plus used in a new indication in the repair of a herniated disc. It will be conducted in a prospective, multicenter, unmasked, clinical trial including 120 subjects randomized to NOVOCART® Disc plus (NDplus, 60 subjects), media NOVOCART® Disc basic with no active cell component (NDbasic, 36 subjects) and to standard of care (SC) sequestrectomy as control (24 subjects). 24 patients will be enrolled in Phase I of the study (12 NDplus, 12 NDbasic) and 96 patients in Phase II (48 NDplus, 24 NDbasic, 24 SC).
All subjects will be evaluated at 1.5-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-months post-t0 examination in the SC study arm and 1.5-, 3-, 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 48-months post-t5 examination in the NDplus and NDbasic study arms, and then 5 years post-t0/t5 to collect long-term clinical data. Efficacy measurements for functional improvement will be evaluated among NDplus, NDbasic and SC. Physiological effects observed from MRI measurements will be compared between appropriate treatments depending on expected treatment mechanisms. Safety data of NDplus will be combined with NDbasic to contrast against SC on procedure related risks and NDplus against NDbasic and SC together on graft-related adverse experiences.
To optimize the usefulness of clinical information, data collected in the study may be analyzed and reviewed continuously. Early findings may be used to modify the study design when deemed appropriate and acceptable by the Sponsor's medical advisors. Data-driven adaptive actions include but are not limited to stopping enrollment early. The Sponsor will inform regulatory bodies, Ethic Committees, and investigators before implementing study design modifications.
Cells and tissues collected from this study will be used in other in vitro-controlled experiments aimed at developing and validating known and novel biologic markers to quantify cell quality in the context of identity, purity and potency. Prognostic values of these biologic markers will be examined by correlating them with clinical data collected in this study.
The study will follow each subject for a total of five years post-t0 examination in the SC study arm and post-t5 examination in the NDplus and NDbasic study arms to obtain long-term performance data.
Patients must have a single-level acute disc herniation with an indication for an elective sequestrectomy. They may further have corresponding disc degeneration in the proximal adjacent segment (Pfirrmann Score Stage 3-4). A total of 120 adults will be enrolled in this study.
Each patient will remain in the study for 5 years post t0/t5 examination to complete the planned follow-up phase. It is expected to take 6 years and five months to collect all required data for this study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Radiological Inclusion Criteria
Patients must meet all of the following criteria to be considered for enrollment in the NOVO-CART® Disc study.
Patients without adjacent degenerative disc (HD):
Patients with adjacent degenerative disc (AAD):
Exclusion criteria
Radiological Exclusion Criteria
Intra-surgery (tissue explant/sequestrectomy) Exclusion Criteria
Exclusion criteria
determined after tissue explant/sequestrectomy
Exclusion criteria
prior Transplantation/Implantation
Autologous Disc Chondrocyte Transplantation System (ADCT)
ADCT (Media with no active cell component)
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) to 12-months follow-up
Primary efficacy variable.
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed when all patients completed scheduled 12-months follow-up visit (Interim analysis).
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) to 24-months follow-up
Primary efficacy variable.
Primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed when all patients completed scheduled at 24-months follow-up visit (Interim analysis).
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) to 60-months follow-up
Primary efficacy variable.
Final analysis will be performed when all patients completed scheduled 60-months follow-up visit.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 60-months follow-up
Secondary efficacy variable
Early evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 12-months follow-up, primary evaluation for efficacy will be performed at 24-months follow-up, and final analysis will be performed at 60-months follow-up.
Time frame: transplantation
Outcome to quantify feasibility of procedure
When all NDplus and NDbasic patients completed transplantation procedure.
Time frame: Sequestrectomy and transplantation
Outcome to quantify feasibility of procedure
When all enrolled patients completed sequestrectomy and if applicable transplantation procedure.
Time frame: 12-months post-operation
Outcome to Quantify Safety
A subsequent surgical intervention is defined as any invasive procedure performed at the index level to treat the same condition (herniation) or other conditions resulted from the transplantation/implantation procedure within the 12-month period post-operation.
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy up to 60-months follow-up at any scheduled and unscheduled visit
Outcome to Quantify Safety
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 1,5-months follow-up
Outcome to Quantify Safety (Phase I only)
At sequestrectomy, 2h-, 6h-, 24h-, 36h- post surgery, transplantation, direct after transplantation, 6h-, 12h-, 18h-, 24h-, 30h-, 36h-, 42h-, 48h- post transplantation, 3 and 6 weeks post transplantation
Time frame: Sequestrectomy
Outcome to Develop and Validate Biological Markers
Time frame: Transplantation
Outcome to Develop and Validate Biological Markers
Time frame: Baseline assessment 1<45d pre-sequestrectomy, pre-transplantation (90 +/- 15d post-sequestrectomy) up to 24-months follow-up
Outcome to Develop and Validate Biological Markers
Tetec AG
Industry
A Prospective Randomized Multicentre Phase I/II Clinical Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of NOVOCART® Disc Plus Autologous Disc Chondrocyte Transplantation (ADCT) in the Treatment of Nucleotomized and Degenerative Lumbar Discs to Avoid Secondary Disease
Acronym: NDisc
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02351206
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT01944345
Bone Diseases, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07386548
Back Pain, Bone Diseases
Manhattan, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05110833
Bone Diseases, Bone Diseases, Infectious
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial Details