Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00888914

Safety and Efficacy Study of RT001 to Treat Moderate to Severe Lateral Canthal Lines

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RT001 to treat moderate to severe lateral canthal lines in adults.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

30 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Richard G. Glogau, MD, San Francisco, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This multi-center study evaluates the safety and efficacy of four different doses of RT001 compared to vehicle applied as a single, bilateral topical application in at least 60 subjects with moderate to severe lateral canthal lines. Subjects will be randomized to one of the five treatment groups in a 1:1:1:1:1 ratio. Follow-up visits are scheduled through 28 days post-treatment. The safety and efficacy of Cohort 1 (through the Day 14 visit) will be assessed prior to the decision to enroll subjects into Cohort 2 if additional doses or treatment regimens need to be evaluated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female or male; 30 to 55 years of age
  • Bilateral lateral canthal lines rated as moderate or advanced
  • Willing to refrain from receiving facial fillers, laser treatments, use of any product that affects remodeling or a product that may cause an active dermal response in the treatment area beginning at Screening through End of Study
  • Women of childbearing potential must be practicing and willing to continue to use an effective method of birth control during the course of the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Muscle weakness or paralysis in the area receiving study treatment
  • Active skin disease or irritation at the treatment areas
  • Undergone any procedures that may affect the lateral canthal region during the past 12 months prior to Screening
  • Previous treatment with botulinum toxin (any serotype) in the head or neck area within 9 months prior to Baseline (Day 0)
  • Use of a topical steroid on either of the treatment areas or use of medications that suppress the immune system 30 days prior to Screening and continuing through End of Study (Day 28)
  • Any abnormality on the electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening or any history of clinically significant arrhythmia, unstable angina, myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure

Treatment and study plan

RT001

Drug

RT001

Vehicle Comparator

Other

Vehicle Comparator

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of subjects classified as exhibiting improvement via the Investigator Global Assessment at Smile from Baseline (Day 0) to End of Study (Day 28)

    Time frame: Day 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. The number of subjects classified as exhibiting improvement via the Investigator Global Assessment at Rest from Baseline (Day 0) to End of Study (Day 28)

    Time frame: Day 28

  2. Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs

    Time frame: Day 28

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Revance Therapeutics, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase 2, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Controlled, Dose-Ranging, Multi-Center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of RT001, a Botulinum Toxin Type A Topical Gel, to Treat Moderate to Severe Lateral Canthal Lines in Adults.

Important dates

Study start
2008
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2009
First posted
Apr 28, 2009
Registry last updated
Nov 19, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.