Pembrolizumab
BiologicalIntravenous infusion
Other names: MK-3475
NCT Number: NCT02821000
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, and objective response rate (ORR) of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Chinese participants with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, with disease progression following first line chemotherapy or targeted therapy. ORR will be based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1).
With Amendment 6 (effective date 18-Mar-2022), once the study objectives have been met or the study has ended, participants will be discontinued from this study and may be enrolled in an extension study to continue protocol-defined assessments and treatment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Intravenous infusion
Other names: MK-3475
Time frame: Up to approximately 17 months (Through data cutoff date of 27-December-2017)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study treatment and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study treatment or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of study treatment, is also an AE. The number of all participants who experienced at least one AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 17 months (through data cutoff date of 27-December-2017)
The number of all participants who discontinued study treatment due to an AE is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 17 months (through data cutoff date of 27-December-2017)
ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). The ORR per RECIST 1.1 for participants is presented. Participants without response data were treated as non-responders. ORR was analyzed using an exact method based on binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method) and is reported as percentage of participants.
Time frame: Up to approximately 76 months
OS was defined as the time from first day of study treatment to death due to any cause. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months.
Time frame: Up to approximately 76 months
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per RECIST 1.1 based on blinded independent central review (BICR) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. The PFS per RECIST 1.1 for participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 76 months
DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all target lesions) or a Partial Response (PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) per RECIST 1.1 until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using RECIST 1.1, progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must have demonstrated an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. DOR assessments were based on blinded independent central review (BICR). DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months.
Time frame: Up to approximately 76 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of the participants in the analysis population who had a Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all lesions and no new lesions confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation) or a Partial Response (PR: at least a 50% decrease in tumor burden relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation) per irRECIST assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). The ORR per irRECIST for participants is presented. Participants without response data were treated as non-responders. ORR was analyzed using an exact method based on binomial distribution (Clopper-Pearson method) and is reported as percentage of participants.
Time frame: Up to approximately 76 months
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression per irRECIST based on blinded independent central review (BICR) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using irRECIST, progressive disease was defined as at least a 25% increase in tumor burden relative the minimum recorded tumor burden confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months. The PFS per irRECIST for participants is presented.
Time frame: Up to approximately 76 months
DOR was defined as the time from first documented evidence of Complete Response (CR: disappearance of all lesions and no new lesions confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation) or Partial Response (PR: at least a 50% decrease in tumor burden relative to baseline confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation) per irRECIST until disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Using irRECIST, progressive disease was defined as at least a 25% increase in tumor burden relative the minimum recorded tumor burden confirmed by a consecutive assessment at least 4 weeks after first documentation. DOR assessments were based on blinded independent central review (BICR). DOR was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and is reported in months.
Time frame: Day 21: Prior to the Cycle 2 (21-day cycle) Dose
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the lowest (trough) concentration of pembrolizumab prior to the next dose of pembrolizumab administered during Cycle 2 (21-day cycle). The mean Ctrough of pembrolizumab prior to Cycle 2 is presented.
Time frame: Day 63: Prior to the Cycle 4 (21-day cycle) Dose
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the lowest (trough) concentration of pembrolizumab prior to the next dose of pembrolizumab administered during Cycle 4 (21-day cycle). The mean Ctrough of pembrolizumab prior to Cycle 4 is presented.
Time frame: Day 105: Prior to the Cycle 6 (21-day cycle) Dose
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the lowest (trough) concentration of pembrolizumab prior to the next dose of pembrolizumab administered during Cycle 6 (21-day cycle). The mean Ctrough of pembrolizumab prior to Cycle 6 is presented.
Time frame: Day 147: Prior to the Cycle 8 (21-day cycle) Dose
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the lowest (trough) concentration of pembrolizumab prior to the next dose of pembrolizumab administered during Cycle 8 (21-day cycle). The mean Ctrough of pembrolizumab prior to Cycle 8 is presented.
Time frame: Day 231: Prior to the Cycle 12 (21-day cycle) Dose
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the lowest (trough) concentration of pembrolizumab prior to the next dose of pembrolizumab administered during Cycle 12 (21-day cycle). The mean Ctrough of pembrolizumab prior to Cycle 12 is presented.
Time frame: Day 315: Prior to the Cycle 16 (21-day cycle) Dose
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the lowest (trough) concentration of pembrolizumab prior to the next dose of pembrolizumab administered during Cycle 16 (21-day cycle). The mean Ctrough of pembrolizumab prior to Cycle 16 is presented.
Time frame: Day 0: 30 minutes after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (21-day cycle)
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the Cmax of pembrolizumab 30 minutes after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (21-day cycle). The Cmax of pembrolizumab is presented.
Time frame: Day 147: 30 minutes after the end of infusion during Cycle 8 (21-day cycle)
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the Cmax of pembrolizumab 30 minutes after the end of infusion during Cycle 8 (21-day cycle). The Cmax of pembrolizumab is presented.
Time frame: Day 2: 1 day after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (21-day cycle)
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the serum concentration of pembrolizumab 1 day after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (21-day cycle). The serum concentration of pembrolizumab is presented.
Time frame: Day 6: 5 days after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (21-day cycle)
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the serum concentration of pembrolizumab 5 days after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (21-day cycle). The serum concentration of pembrolizumab is presented.
Time frame: Day 15: 14 days after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (21-day cycle)
Blood samples were obtained for PK analysis of the serum concentration of pembrolizumab 14 days after the end of infusion during Cycle 1 (21-day cycle). The serum concentration of pembrolizumab is presented.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Industry
A Phase Ib Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Chinese Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Melanoma (Keynote-151)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02718066
Adenocarcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00429312
Melanoma, Neoplasms
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06666634
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT02724488
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Neoplasms
View Trial Details