Placebo
DrugParticipants received placebo matched to M2951 twice daily up to Day 84 during the double-blind treatment period.
NCT Number: NCT02784106
M2951 is an investigational drug under evaluation for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. The purpose of the study is to assess the efficacy of M2951 in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) currently treated with stable dose of methotrexate (MTX).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Merck KGaA Communication Center, Darmstadt, Germany
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Participants received placebo matched to M2951 twice daily up to Day 84 during the double-blind treatment period.
Participants received 50 milligrams (mg) M2951 orally twice daily up to Day 84 during the double-blind treatment period.
Other names: Evobrutinib
Time frame: Day 84
ACR 20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=20% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Proportion of ACR20 responders = Number of participants with ACR20 response divided by total participants.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 28
Mean change in the hsCRP concentration from baseline at Day 28 was reported.
Time frame: Day 28, Day 56 and Day 84
ACR 50 response: >=50% improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=50% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI; and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Proportion of ACR50 responders = Number of participants with ACR50 response divided by total participants.
Time frame: Day 28, Day 56 and Day 84
ACR 70 response: >=70% improvement in both tender joint counts (based on a total of 68 joints) and swollen joint counts (based on a total of 66 joints) together with >=70% improvement in at least 3 of the following: 1) participant's assessment of pain; 2) participant's global assessment of disease activity; 3) physician's global assessment of disease activity; 4) participant's assessment of physical function measured by HAQ-DI; and 5) acute phase reactant as measured by hsCRP. Proportion of ACR70 responders = Number of participants with ACR70 response divided by total participants.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 84
Mean change in the hsCRP concentration from baseline at Day 84 was reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 28 and Day 84
Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on a 28 joint count hsCRP consisted of composite numerical score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and participant's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014* participant's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Scores ranged 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity.
Time frame: Day 84
DAS28-hsCRP consisted of composite score of following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hsCRP (mg/mL), and participant's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP =0.56* sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt(SJC28)+ 0.014* participant's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Scores ranged 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. Proportion of participants with DAS28-hsCRP value <3.2 were reported.
Time frame: Day 84
DAS28 consisted of composite score of following variables: TJC28, SJC28, hsCRP (mg/mL), and participant's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP =0.56* sqrt (TJC28) + 0.28*sqrt (SJC28)+ 0.014* participant's global assessment of disease activity + 0.36*natural log(hsCRP+1) +0.96. Scores ranged 1.0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. Proportion of participants with DAS28-hsCRP value <2.6 were reported.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 28 and Day 84
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a type of blood test that measures how quickly erythrocytes (red blood cells) settle at the bottom of a test tube that contains a blood sample. Higher values indicate inflammation in the body.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 28 and Day 84
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) is an antibody present in most rheumatoid arthritis participants.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 28 and Day 84
Rheumatoid Factor is an anti-body present in the blood.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 84
The participant's overall assessment of disease activity was recorded using the 100 millimeter (mm) horizontal visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (symptom free and no arthritis symptoms) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis disease activity).
Time frame: Baseline, Day 84
The participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst possible pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 84
The HAQ-DI questionnaire assessed the participant's self-perception on the degree of difficulty [0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with much difficulty), and 3 (unable to do)] when dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and performing other daily activities. Scores for each functional area were averaged to calculate HAQ-DI scores, which ranged from 0 (no disability) to 3 (worst disability). A decrease in HAQ-DI score indicated an improvement in the participant's condition.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 84
The Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity was recorded using the 100 mm horizontal VAS. Physician rated participant's arthritis disease activity on a scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no disease activity (no arthritis) and 100 represented maximum disease activity (maximum arthritis).
Time frame: Baseline up to 16 Weeks
An Adverse event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug or worsening of pre-existing medical condition, whether or not related to study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. TEAEs included both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs.
Time frame: Baseline up to 16 Weeks
Grade 3 and 4 TEAES as per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Experience version 4.03 (NCI-CTCAE v 4.03) were presented. Grade 3 refers to severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care and Activity of daily living (ADL).Grade 4 refers to Life-threatening consequences; where urgent intervention indicated.
Time frame: Baseline up to 16 Weeks
Clinically significant abnormalities for hematology, biochemistry or coagulation were graded with National Cancer Institute - Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v4.03 toxicity grades, where Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life threatening and Grade 5 = death. Participants with grade 3 or higher were reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to 16 Weeks
Vital sign assessment included blood pressure, pulse rate, respiratory rate and temperature. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Time frame: Baseline up to 16 Weeks
The 12-lead ECG recordings were obtained after 10 minutes of rest in a semi-supine position. The ECG parameters obtained directly from the computerized 12-lead ECG recordings included rhythm, ventricular rate, PR interval, QRS duration, and QT interval. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Time frame: Pre-dose at Day 1; 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 29
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 29
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 29
Time frame: Pre-dose on Day 29
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 29
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 29
Accumulation ratio for AUC was calculated as AUC 0-6h, Day 29 divided by AUC 0-6h, Day 1
Time frame: Pre-dose, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 29
Accumulation ratio for Cmax , was calculated as Cmax, Day 29 divided by Cmax, Day1
Time frame: Baseline, Day 85
Following immunoglobulin levels were measured: Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin G Subclass 1, Immunoglobulin G Subclass 2, Immunoglobulin G Subclass 3, Immunoglobulin G Subclass 4, Immunoglobulin M.
Time frame: Baseline, Day 85
Following immunoglobulin levels were measured: Immunoglobulin A , Immunoglobulin G, Immunoglobulin G Subclass 1, Immunoglobulin G Subclass 2, Immunoglobulin G Subclass 3, Immunoglobulin G Subclass 4, Immunoglobulin M.
Time frame: Day 85
Time frame: Baseline, Day 85
EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.
Industry
Phase IIa Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of M2951 in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis on Stable Methotrexate Therapy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03649178
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03025308
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715045
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT00055055
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details