Ipilimumab
DrugOther names: Yervoy™
NCT Number: NCT02279862
The purpose of this study is to examine the safety and effectiveness (how well the drug works) of two different doses (3 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg) of Ipilimumab (Yervoy™) in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Phase 2
Local Institution, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2)
Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
For more information regarding BMS clinical trial participation, please visit www.BMSStudyConnect.com
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: Yervoy™
Time frame: From date of randomization until disease progression or death (assessed up to December 2016, approximately 24 months)
rPFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of disease progression based on radiographic evidence and/or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Radiographic disease progression is defined as: Confirmed bone disease progression according to criteria adapted from the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 (PCWG2), OR Non-bone disease progression according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. After termination of the study, collection of tumor assessments and other data to support the efficacy analyses was no longer required in patients who discontinued study treatment. As a result, the presented efficacy results are based on limited data. The number of participants with reported radiographic progression is shown.
Time frame: From first dose of ipilimumab to last dose plus 90 days
The total number of participants with immune-related adverse events of any grade is reported for each arm.
Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause (assessed up to December 2016, approximately 24 months)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. For those participants who have not died, OS was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive. After termination of the study, collection of tumor assessments and other data to support the efficacy analyses was no longer required in patients who discontinued study treatment. As a result, the presented efficacy results are based on limited data. The total number of reported deaths is shown.
Time frame: From randomization to the earliest date of PSA progression or death, whichever comes earlier (assessed up to December 2016, approximately 24 months)
Prostate specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA PFS) was defined as the time from randomization to the earliest date of PSA progression or death, whichever occurs earlier. Participants who did not progress or die were censored at the last PSA assessment date. After termination of the study, collection of tumor assessments and other data to support the efficacy analyses was no longer required in patients who discontinued study treatment. As a result, the presented efficacy results are based on limited data. The number of participants with reported PSA progression is shown.
Time frame: From randomization until pain progression (assessed up to December 2016, approximately 24 months)
Pain progression was defined as an increase in BPI-SF pain Item #3 score of >= 2 point from baseline maintained over 2 consecutive periods. After termination of the study, collection of tumor assessments and other data to support the efficacy analyses was no longer required in patients who discontinued study treatment, and presented efficacy results are based on limited data. The number of participants with reported pain progression is shown.
Time frame: From baseline to PSA response (assessed up to December 2016, approximately 48 months)
PSA response rate was defined as the proportion of participants with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline to the lowest post-baseline PSA result (confirmed 3 weeks later) for each randomized arm. After termination of the study, collection of tumor assessments and other data to support the efficacy analyses was no longer required in patients who discontinued study treatment. As a result, the presented efficacy results are based on limited data. The number of participants showing PSA response is shown.
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Industry
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Ipilimumab Administered at 3 mg/kg vs 10 mg/kg in Adult Subjects With Metastatic Chemotherapy-Naïve Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Are Asymptomatic or Minimally Symptomatic
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03269422
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05754658
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03606837
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06540794
Genital Diseases, Genital Diseases, Male
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details