EXC 001
DrugMultiple intradermal injections of EXC 001 and placebo
NCT Number: NCT01037413
This study will compare how well EXC 001 works to improve the appearance of scars in subjects undergoing breast scar revision surgery. The study will also evaluate the safety of EXC 001 in healthy adult subjects.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
Scripps medical, La Jolla, California, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Multiple intradermal injections of EXC 001 and placebo
Multiple intradermal injections of EXC 001 and placebo
Time frame: Part B: Week 12
Scar assessment by an expert panel was done on blinded photographs using 100 millimeter (mm) visual analog scale (VAS) where a score of 0 mm = best possible scar and a score of 100 mm = worst possible scar, where higher scores indicate worse condition.
Time frame: Part B: Week 8 and 24
Scar assessment by an expert panel was done on blinded photographs using 100 mm VAS where a score of 0 mm = best possible scar and a score of 100 mm = worst possible scar, where higher scores indicate worse condition.
Time frame: Part B: Week 12 and 24
Physician observer assessment of scar was done using a valid published 10-point rating scale. Physician rated vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, surface area and overall opinion for a scar on a score of 1= normal skin to 10= worst scar imaginable, where higher scores indicate worse condition. Composite score was the sum of all the scores except the overall opinion score and range from 6 (best score) to 60 (worst score), where higher scores indicate worse condition.
Time frame: Part B: Week 12 and 24
Participants rated pain, itching, color, stiffness, thickness, irregularity, and overall opinion of scar on 10-point scale. For pain and itching associated with scar: range =1 (no, not at all) to 10 (yes, worst imaginable) and for other parameters associated with scar compared to normal skin: range =1 (no, same as normal skin) to 10 (yes, very different), where higher scores indicate worse condition. Composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion, range 6 (best) to 60 (worst), where higher scores indicate worse condition. Scar appearance composite score = sum of all scores except overall opinion, pain and itching, range 4 (best) to 40 (worst), where higher scores indicate worse condition.
Time frame: Part A: Day 1; Part B, Active Dosing: Week 2 up to Week 13; Part B, Post Dosing: Week 13 to end of the study (Week 24)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. AEs included SAEs and all non-SAEs that occurred during the study.
Time frame: Screening (up to Day 21 prior to Day 1 of Part A), Part B: Day 1, Week 12
Physical examination included the assessment of skin; head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat; respiratory; cardiovascular; abdomen; musculoskeletal; neurological; gastrointestinal; genitourinary; endocrine and lymph nodes. Abnormal physical examination findings was based on investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Screening (up to Day 21 prior to Day 1 of Part A), Part B: Week 12
Number of participants with clinically significant abnormality in ECG were reported. Clinical significance was based on investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Screening (up to Day 21 prior to Day 1 of Part A), Part B: Day 1 up to Week 12
Laboratory analysis included hematology, biochemistry and urinalysis. Hematology range: basophils (bas) 0-0.2, eosinophils (eos) 0-0.4, leukocytes (leu) 4-10.5, lymphocytes (lym) 0.7-4.5, neutrophils (neu) 1.8-7.8, platelet 140-415, monocytes (mon) 0.1-1 in 10^9 per liter; bas/leu 0-3, eos/leu 0-7, lym/leu 14-46, mon/leu 4-13, neu/leu and neu/leu 40-74 in percentage, erythrocytes 3.8-5.1 10^12/L, hematocrit 0.34-0.44 L/L, hemoglobin 115-150 gram per liter (g/L). Biochemistry range: creatine kinase 24-173, alkaline phosphatase 25-150, alanine aminotransferase (AT) and aspartate AT 0-40 in International units per liter; creatinine 50-88, urate 89-399, bilirubin 2-21 in micromole per liter, glucose 3.6-5.5, potassium 3.5-5.5, sodium 135-148, blood urea nitrogen 1.8-9.3 in millimole/L, albumin 35-55 g/L. Urinalysis parameters: pH (5-7.5), specific gravity (1.005-1.03). Participants with clinically significant findings were reported.
Time frame: Screening (up to Day 21 prior to Day 1 of Part A), Part B: Day 1 up to Week 12
Following vital sign parameters were assessed: diastolic blood pressure, systolic blood pressure, respiration rate, pulse rate, and temperature. Clinical significance was based on investigator's discretion.
Time frame: Part A: Day 1, Part B: Week 2 up to Week 24
Participants were instructed to inform the investigator in case of any itching, redness, pain or any other symptom that appears to be a rash at the injection sites. Erythematous, raised (indurated) and edematous reactions were considered as positive skin sensitivity reactions.
Pfizer
Industry
A PHASE 2, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, WITHIN-SUBJECT CONTROLLED STUDY TO EVALUATE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF EXC 001 FOR THE AMELIORATION OF SCARRING FOLLOWING REVISION OF SCARS RESULTING FROM PRIOR BREAST SURGERY IN ADULT FEMALE SUBJECTS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01037985
Cicatrix, Fibrosis
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04707131
Cicatrix, Fibrosis
Cheongju-si, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT01780077
Cicatrix, Fibrosis
View Trial DetailsNCT01640912
Cicatrix, Fibrosis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial Details