Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01391299

Safety and Efficacy Study of Botulinum Toxin Type A for the Treatment of Forehead and Frown Lines

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin Type A compared to placebo for the treatment of forehead lines (facial rhytides) when also administered to frown lines (glabellar rhytides).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Moderate to severe forehead lines

Exclusion criteria

  • Current or previous botulinum toxin treatment of any serotype within one year
  • Diagnosis of myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
  • Prior facial cosmetic surgery (e.g. prior periorbital surgery, facial lift, brow lift, eyelid lift or eyebrow surgery)
  • Facial laser or light treatment, microdermabrasion, or superficial peels within 3 months
  • Oral retinoid therapy within one year

Treatment and study plan

Botulinum toxin type A

Biological

Botulinum toxin Type A (total dose 30 Units or 40 Units) injected into bilateral forehead and frown line areas on Day 1.

Other names: BOTOX® Cosmetic

normal saline

Drug

Normal Saline (placebo) injected into bilateral forehead and frown line areas on Day 1.

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Score of None or Mild by Investigator-Assessed Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) in Forehead Lines at Maximum Eyebrow Elevation

    Time frame: Day 30

    The Investigator assessed the severity of the patient's forehead lines at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-point FWS: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentage of participants with a score of none or mild at Day 30.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Score of None or Mild by Subject-Assessed Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) in Forehead Lines at Maximum Eyebrow Elevation

    Time frame: Day 30

    The patient assessed the severity of their forehead lines at maximum eyebrow elevation using the 4-point FWS: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentage of participants with a score of none or mild at Day 30.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving Satisfied or Very Satisfied by Subject Assessment of Satisfaction of Appearance of Forehead Lines

    Time frame: Day 30

    Participants rated their overall satisfaction with the appearance of the forehead line area using a 5-point scale: 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied or 5=very satisfied. The percentage of participants with a rating of satisfied or very satisfied at Day 30.

  2. Percentage of Participants With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline by Investigator-Assessed FWS in Forehead Lines at Rest

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 30

    The Investigator assessed the severity of the patient's forehead lines at rest using the 4-point FWS: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentage of participants with a ≥1 grade improvement from baseline.

  3. Percentage of Participants With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline by Subject-Assessed FWS in Forehead Lines at Rest

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 30

    Participants assessed the severity of their forehead lines at rest using the 4-point FWS: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate or 3=severe. The percentage of participants with a ≥1 grade improvement from baseline.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Allergan

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Single Treatment Cycle Study of BOTOX® Cosmetic (Botulinum Toxin Type A) Purified Neurotoxin Complex in Subjects With Forehead and Glabellar Rhytides

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jul 12, 2011
Registry last updated
Apr 17, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.