Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00288418

Safety and Efficacy Study of Angiotech Central Venous Catheter to Prevent Bacterial Catheter Colonization

The main purpose of this study is to determine if the Angiotech central venous catheter (CVC) is equal in effectiveness to a CVC coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine in preventing bacterial catheter colonization. Other objectives of this study are to determine if the Angiotech CVC is equal in effectiveness to a CVC coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine in preventing catheter-related local infection, and catheter-related bloodstream infection. This study will also assess the safety of the Angiotech CVC.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons, P.C., Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Central venous catheters are widely used for hemodynamic monitoring and the administration of fluids, drugs, and nutrition. The most frequent life-threatening complication of central venous catheter use is septicemia. Normal cutaneous flora may invade the intracutaneous tract during or after catheter insertion. The colonizing bacteria subsequently disseminate along the catheter surface and ultimately seed into the blood stream.

In the United States, a total of 250,000 cases of central venous catheter-related infections are estimated annually. Costs per infection are estimated as high as US$56,000. It is clinically imperative that effective measures be found to decrease catheter infection rates while minimizing the risk of the development of microbial resistance.

Primary Objective: The primary objective of this study is to determine the non-inferiority of the Angiotech Central Venous Catheter (CVC) when compared to the ARROWgard Blue® CVC to prevent bacterial catheter colonization.

Secondary Objectives: The secondary objectives of this study are to determine the non-inferiority of the Angiotech CVC when compared to the ARROWgard Blue® CVC to prevent:

  • catheter-related local infection; and
  • catheter-related bloodstream infection.

Safety Objectives: This study will assess the safety of the Angiotech CVC.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • at least 18 years of age
  • Be initially hospitalized in an intensive care setting
  • Require insertion of a triple-lumen central venous catheter for an anticipated period of up to 28 days
  • If female and of child-bearing potential, provide evidence of a negative pregnancy test

Exclusion criteria

  • Has a life expectancy of less than one month
  • Is pregnant
  • Has a history of anaphylactic reactions, including reactions to contrast dyes
  • Has a history of allergy to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or chlorhexidine

Treatment and study plan

Central Venous Catheter

Device

7-French x 20-cm, triple lumen, short-term CVC vs. 7-French x 20-cm, triple lumen, short-term CVC with an anti-infective polymer coating, applied to the outer surface that contains the active pharmaceutical ingredient 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The Angiotech CVC uses a 50µg/linear cm dose of 5-FU

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of catheter colonization

    Time frame: Maximum of 28 days

    Primary Objective: The primary objective of this study was to determine the non-inferiority of the Angiotech Central Venous Catheter (CVC) when compared to the ARROWgard Blue® CVC to prevent bacterial catheter colonization.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Angiotech Pharmaceuticals

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Controlled, Randomized, Single-Blind, Multi-Center Pivotal Clinical Study Using Angiotech CVC to Prevent Bacterial Colonization on Short-Term Central Venous Catheters

Important dates

Study start
2005
Primary completion
2007
Study completion
2007
First posted
Feb 8, 2006
Registry last updated
Jan 23, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.