Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00849017

Safety and Efficacy Study of Albiglutide in Type 2 Diabetes

The purpose of this study is to determine whether albiglutide is effective in the treament of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Primary location

GSK Investigational Site, Tijuana, Baja California Norte, Mexico

Loading trial locations.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • type 2 diabetes
  • BMI 20-45kg/m2 inclusive

Exclusion criteria

  • females who are pregnant, lactating, or <6 weeks post-partum
  • CHF NYHA class III-IV

Treatment and study plan

albiglutide

Biological

albiglutide weekly injection

albiglutide uptitration

Biological

albiglutide uptitration at week 12

Placebo

Biological

matching albiglutide placebo weekly injection

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

    Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (<65 years versus ≥65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156

    Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156

    HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.

  2. Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

    Time frame: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

    Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and <Week 4; FPG >=250 mg/dL between >=Week 4 and <Week 12; HbA1c >=8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline between >=Week 12 and <Week 24; HbA1c >=8.5% between >=Week 24 and <Week 48; HbA1c >=8.0% between >= Week 48 and <Week 156. Participants could have been rescued at any time on or after Week 2. Time to hyperglycemia rescue is defined as the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of hyperglycemia rescue plus 1 day, or the time between the date of the first dose of study medication and the date of the last visit during the active treatment period plus 1 day for participants not requiring rescue. This time was divided by 7 to express the result in weeks.

  3. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

    The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.

  4. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 156

    The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline FPG minus the Baseline FPG.

  5. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

    Time frame: Week 52

    The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) were assessed.

  6. Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

    Time frame: Week 156

    The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) were assessed.

  7. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

    The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy.

  8. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 156

    The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight.

  9. Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameter-4 Hour C-peptide AUC

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

    Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameter analyzed was 4 hour c-peptide AUC. The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.

  10. Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameter- 4 Hour Blood Glucose AUC

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

    Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameter analyzed was: 4 hour blood glucose area under urve AUC The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.

  11. Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameters-4 Hour Insulin AUC and 4 Hour Proinsulin AUC

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 52

    Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameters analyzed were: 4-hour insulin AUC (4 hr Ins AUC), and 4-hour proinsulin AUC (4 hr pro-Ins AUC). The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed.

  12. Albiglutide Plasma Concentration at Weeks 8 and 24

    Time frame: Weeks 8 and 24

    Albiglutide plasma concentration data was analyzed at Week 8 pre-dose, Week 8 post dose, Week 24 pre-dose and Week 24 post-dose. All participants who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30mg weekly dosing regimen; however, beginning at Week 12, participants in the albiglutide 50 mg treatment group were uptitrated to receive albiglutide 50 mg for the remainder of the study.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of Albiglutide Compared With Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2013
First posted
Feb 23, 2009
Registry last updated
Jan 9, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.