Klinikum Vest GmbH
Recklinghausen, Westfalen-Lippe, 45657, Germany
NCT Number: NCT02144077
The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness and safety of the medicine Ameluz® (5-aminolevulinic acid) in comparison to methyl-aminolevulinate (MAL), used with photodynamic therapy (PDT), to treat thin, non-aggressive BCC (basal cell carcinoma).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Recklinghausen, Westfalen-Lippe, 45657, Germany
The treatment comprises of up to 2 PDT cycles, each with two PDT sessions one week apart.
If 12 weeks after the the second PDT all lesions are completely cleared the patient will enter the follow-up phase. In case of remaining lesions the patient will receive a second PDT cycle starting on the same day.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Main Inclusion Criteria:
Main Exclusion Criteria:
Topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining drug application and subsequent illumination with a narrow spectrum light source (after 3 h of drug incubation)
Other names: Ameluz
Topical treatment for photodynamic therapy combining drug application and subsequent illumination with a narrow spectrum light source (after 3 h of drug incubation)
Other names: Metvix / Metvixia
Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT (please note: 2 PDT cycles, each cycle consisting of 2 PDTs (= maximum of 4 PDTs per patient) was possible).
Overall patient complete response rate assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT. The indicated values give the percentage of overall complete responders. An overall complete responder is defined as a patient in whom all treated lesions were cleared. The PP set is the primary analysis set for the analyses of the primary endpoint.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT (please note: 2 PDT cycles, each cycle consisting of 2 PDTs (= maximum of 4 PDTs per patient) was possible).
Lesion complete response (completely cleared individual lesions) assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT. The indicated values give percentage of overall completely cleared individual lesions. The PP set is the primary analysis set for the analysis of the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT (please note: 2 PDT cycles, each cycle consisting of 2 PDTs (= maximum of 4 PDTs per patient) was possible).
Reduction of total lesion area (summation of sizes of all treated lesions) per patient, assessed 12 weeks after the last PDT. The PP set is the primary analysis set for the analysis of the secondary endpoint.
Please note that the high SD for BF-200 ALA is due to a patient who had increased lesion area fom 63 mm² at baseline to 225 mm² 12 weeks after PDT. This lesion area included a lesion that was later confirmed to be benign skin condition (lentigo solaris).
Time frame: 12 weeks after PDT-2 (=PDT cycle 1; please note: in this study 2 PDT cycles, each cycle consisting of 2 PDTs (= maximum of 4 PDTs per patient) was possible).
Patient complete response (complete clearance of all treated lesions) assessed 12 weeks after PDT-2 (first PDT cycle). The PP set is the primary analysis set for the analysis of the secondary endpoint.
Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT (please note: 2 PDT cycles, each cycle consisting of 2 PDTs (= maximum of 4 PDTs per patient) was possible).
Overall cosmetic outcome 12 weeks after last PDT is calculated as difference between 12 weeks after PDT sum score and baseline sum score of all skin quality assessments. Each of the below skin quality characteristics are assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) by the investigator at baseline and 12 weeks after last PDT:
Cosmetic outcome categories are:
Time frame: 12 weeks after the last PDT (please note: 2 PDT cycles, each cycle consisting of 2 PDTs (= maximum of 4 PDTs per patient) was possible).
Overall cosmetic outcome 12 weeks after last PDT is calculated as difference between 12 weeks after PDT sum score and baseline sum score of all skin quality assessments. Each of the below skin quality characteristics are assessed on a 4-point scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe) by the investigator at baseline and 12 weeks after last PDT:
Cosmetic outcome categories are:
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months post-PDT
Patient recurrence rate defined as the number of patients with at least one recurrent lesion during FU after complete clearance 12 weeks after the last PDT
Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months post-PDT
Lesion recurrence rate defined as the number of completely cleared lesions 12 weeks after the last PDT showing recurrence during FU. Overall and subgroup analysis (nodular basal cell carcinoma (nBCC) and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC)).
Biofrontera Bioscience GmbH
Industry
A Randomized, Observer Blind, Multinational Phase III Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of BF-200 ALA (Ameluz®) in Comparison to Metvix® in the Treatment of Non-aggressive Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) With Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07068568
Basal Cell Cancer, Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC)
Naples, Campania, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT01108094
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), Carcinoma
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00670189
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), Basal Cell Nevoid Syndrome (BCNS)
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07455331
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC), Carcinoma
Brussels, Anderlecht, Belgium
View Trial Details