Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05934383

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Kidney Transplantation Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension

This prospective, single-arm, interventional study is designed to assess the short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of bilateral ultrasound renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) of the native kidneys in renal transplant patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Objectives:

* To assess the short-term and long-term changes in ambulatory and office blood pressure (BP) following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients * To assess the long-term safety of native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients * To assess the short-term and long-term change in antihypertensive drug prescriptions following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients * To assess the short-term and long-term change in adherence to antihypertensive drugs following native kidney RDN in renal transplant patients

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Erasmus University Medical Center

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Joost Daemen, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31107040704

About this study

The RESTART study is an investigator-initiated, prospective, single-center, single-arm interventional study investigating the safety and efficacy of bilateral native kidney RDN in 40 renal transplant patients with uncontrolled hypertension despite antihypertensive medication (or with a documented intolerance to antihypertensive drugs).

Previously, RDN demonstrated to safely reduce BP as compared to sham-control in multiple randomized clinical trials, both in patients with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication. Up until now, patients with a history of renal failure or kidney transplantation have been excluded from these studies. As the pathophysiology of hypertension is considered different in hypertensive renal transplant patients as compared to the previously studied populations (without kidney transplantation), the effect of native kidney RDN in hypertensive patients with a history of kidney transplantation remains unknown. The current study aims to provide novel insights on the safety and efficacy of RDN in this particular population. Adjustment for routine therapy adherence will also be performed as this proved to be an important confounding factor in previous research.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Kidney transplantation ≥ 12 months ago with stable immunosuppressive drug treatment
  • Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≥ 40 ml/min/1.73m2
  • Office systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg and a mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP ≥ 130 mmHg at screening
  • Antihypertensive medication regimen:
  • Stable regimen of at least two antihypertensive drugs of different classes, including a diuretic (defined a thiazide diuretic, loop diuretic or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist), for at least three months, or
  • Documented intolerance to three classes of antihypertensive drugs, and
  • A change in antihypertensive drug regimen is not anticipated within the oncoming three months.
  • Patient is willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Native renal artery anatomy not eligible for RDN, defined as at least one of the following conditions:
  • History of renal artery stenting or angioplasty
  • History of renal denervation
  • History of kidney tumors
  • Renal artery diameter < 3 mm or > 8 mm
  • Renal artery length < 20 mm
  • Fibromuscular disease (FMD) of the native renal arteries
  • Renal artery aneurysm
  • Renal artery stenosis > 30%
  • Presence of a remnant transplant kidney after re-transplantation or absence of native kidneys
  • Solitary native kidney
  • History of intravenous contrast dye allergy or nephropathy
  • Iliac/femoral artery stenosis precluding insertion of the Paradise catheter
  • Uncorrected, treatable secondary cause of hypertension
  • Pregnancy
  • Life expectancy < one year at the discretion of the investigator

Treatment and study plan

Paradise® ultrasound renal denervation system.

Device

Bilateral renal sympathetic denervation of the native kidneys using the Paradise® ultrasound renal denervation system.

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy: change in mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

  2. Safety: occurrence of the composite endpoint

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

    Consisting of (whichever occurs first):

    • All-cause mortality
    • New onset (acute) end-stage renal disease (eGFR< 15 mL/min/m2 or need for renal replacement therapy)
    • Significant embolic event resulting in end-organ damage
    • Renal artery perforation requiring an invasive intervention
    • Renal artery dissection requiring an invasive intervention
    • Major vascular complications
    • Hospitalization for hypertensive or hypotensive crisis

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy: change in mean 24-hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

  2. Efficacy: change in daytime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

  3. Efficacy: change in nighttime ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

  4. Efficacy: change in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

  5. Efficacy: changes in ambulatory (mean 24-hour, daytime, nighttime) systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

    In a subpopulation of patients with an equal level of therapy adherence at both timepoints

  6. Efficacy: changes in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

    In a subpopulation of patients with an equal level of therapy adherence at both timepoints

  7. Efficacy: changes in the number of prescribed defined daily dosages and number of classes of antihypertensive drugs

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

  8. Efficacy: change in the percentage therapy adherence

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

    The percentage adherence will be calculated as the proportion of drugs that could be detected using dried blood spot testing out of all drugs prescribed to the patient at the time of the testing.

  9. Efficacy: annual changes in ambulatory (mean 24-hour, daytime, nighttime) systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

  10. Efficacy: annual changes in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

  11. Efficacy: annual changes in in the number of prescribed defined daily dosages and number of classes of antihypertensive drugs

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

  12. Efficacy: annual change in the percentage therapy adherence

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

    The percentage adherence will be calculated as the proportion of drugs that could be detected using dried blood spot testing out of all drugs prescribed to the patient at the time of the testing.

  13. Safety: the number of patients in whom no successful bilateral renal denervation procedure can be performed

    Time frame: Periprocedural

    E.g. due to anatomical difficulties

  14. Safety: change in renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

  15. Safety: change in renal function (urine protein/creatinine ratio)

    Time frame: Baseline vs. 3-month follow-up

  16. Safety: occurrence of the individual components of the primary safety outcome

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

    • All-cause mortality
    • New onset (acute) end-stage renal disease (eGFR< 15 mL/min/m2 or need for renal replacement therapy)
    • Significant embolic event resulting in end-organ damage
    • Renal artery perforation requiring an invasive intervention
    • Renal artery dissection requiring an invasive intervention
    • Major vascular complications
    • Hospitalization for hypertensive or hypotensive crisis
  17. Safety: occurrence of any major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

    Including myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular mortality

  18. Safety: occurrence of the individual components of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE)

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

    Including myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke and cardiovascular mortality

  19. Safety: annual change in renal function (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

  20. Safety: annual change in renal function (urine protein/creatinine ratio)

    Time frame: Baseline up until and including 5-year follow-up

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Joost Daemen, MD PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

+31107040704

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Erasmus Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

  • ReCor Medical, Inc.

Registry information

Official study title

Safety and Efficacy of Ultrasound Renal Denervation in Kidney Transplantation Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension: the RESTART Study

Acronym: RESTART

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jul 7, 2023
Registry last updated
Jun 26, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.