San Diego, California, United States
NCT Number: NCT01010282
Safety and Efficacy of Two Artificial Tears in Dry Eye Subjects
This study will evaluate the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of two artificial tears compared to a currently available artificial tear in subjects with dry eye.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Current use of an artificial tear at least twice daily, for at least three months prior to Day 1, on average
- Ability/agreement to wear habitual correction (glasses) during study period
Exclusion criteria
- Known allergy or sensitivity to the study product(s) or its components
- Anticipate contact lens wear during the study, or subject has worn contact lenses in the last six months
- Chronic use of systemic medications which may affect a dry eye condition
- Active ocular allergy or infection
- Use of Restasis® or other topical cyclosporine products within 3 months prior to Day 1
- Current use of any topical ophthalmic medications, have used within 2 weeks prior to Day 1, or are likely to use during study.
Treatment and study plan
Glycerin and Polysorbate 80 based artificial tear
Drug1-2 drops in each eye, as needed, but at least twice daily
Other names: Refresh Dry Eye Therapy® Lubricant Eye Drops
Formulation 1: Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium, Glycerin and Polysorbate 80, based artificial tear
Drug1-2 drops in each eye, as needed, but at least twice daily
Formulation 2: Carboxymethylcellulose sodium, glycerin, and Polysorbate 80 based artificial tear
Drug1-2 drops in each eye, as needed, but at least twice daily
Primary outcomes
-
Change From Baseline in Subjective Evaluation of Symptom of Dryness (SESoD)Score at Day 90
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 90
Change from baseline in SESoD score at day 90. The SESoD is a 5-point scale where 0 equals no dryness, 1 equals trace dryness, 2 equals mild dryness, 3 equals moderate dryness, and 4 equals severe dryness. A negative number change from baseline indicates a decrease (improvement) in the symptom of dryness.
Secondary outcomes
-
Change From Baseline in the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Total Score at Day 90
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 90
Change from baseline in the OSDI total score at day 90. The OSDI is a 12-question survey for patients to document their dry eye disease symptoms. The OSDI consists of a 5-point scale (0=none of the time and 4=all of the time), with higher scores representing greater disability. The scores are totaled over the 12 questions and converted to a score of 0-100 (0=no disability and 100=complete disability). A negative number change from baseline represents an improvement.
-
Change From Baseline in Tear Break-up Time (TBUT) at Day 90
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 90
Change from baseline in TBUT at day 90. TBUT is the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. A short TBUT is a sign of poor tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates an increase in TBUT (improvement).
-
Change From Baseline in Corneal Staining at Day 90
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 90
Change from baseline in corneal staining at day 90. The cornea is the transparent front part of the eye which covers the iris and pupil. Corneal staining following administration of fluorescein dye in the eye is graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=severe staining) over 5 areas of the clear central part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and maximum score of 25. The higher the grade score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represents a decrease in corneal staining (improvement).
-
Change From Baseline in Conjunctival Staining Severity Score at Day 90
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), Day 90
Change from baseline in conjunctival staining severity score at day 90. The conjunctiva is the clear membrane covering the white surface of the eye. Conjunctival staining following ocular administration of lissamine green dye was graded using a 6-point scale (0=no staining, 5=severe staining) over 6 areas of the white part of the eye for a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30. The higher the score, the worse the dry eye condition. A negative number change from baseline represents a decrease in the severity of conjunctival staining (improvement).
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Industry
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2009
- Primary completion
- 2010
- Study completion
- 2010
- First posted
- Nov 10, 2009
- Registry last updated
- Aug 17, 2015
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Safety and Efficacy of BRM421 for Dry Eye Syndrome Treatment
NCT04343287
Dry Eye Syndrome, Dry Eye Syndromes
Newport Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsSafety and Efficacy of BRM421 for Dry Eye Syndrome
NCT03066219
Dry Eye Syndrome, Dry Eye Syndromes
Lewiston, Maine, United States
View Trial DetailsPerformance and Safety of T2769 Versus Hylo-Forte® in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Dry Eye Syndrome.
NCT06375499
Dry Eye Syndrome, Dry Eye Syndromes
Prague, Czechia
View Trial DetailsThe Effect of a New Emulsion in Dry Eye Patients on Tear Layer Aberrometry, Contrast Sensitivity, and Reading Ability
NCT01013077
Dry Eye Syndrome, Dry Eye Syndromes
Fullerton, California, United States
View Trial Details