Regulator T Cells
DrugAutologous Regulatory T-Lymphocytes 1*10^6/kg, 2*10^6/kg, 4*10^6/kg and 8*10^6/kg, respectively until restrictive toxic reaction occurs
Other names: Regulatory T-Lymphocytes
NCT Number: NCT06411184
This is a randomized, single-center phase 1/2a clinical trial without blinding. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) have shown potential in treating various immune-related diseases, including autoimmune disorders, transplant rejection, and inflammatory diseases. The investigators plan to recruit participants for a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous Tregs in the treatment of GVHD.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
This randomized, single-center phase 1/2a clinical trial, conducted without blinding, aims to explore the therapeutic promise of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Tregs are specialized immune cells that play a crucial role in modulating the body's immune response, thus offering a unique therapeutic avenue for immune-related conditions. They have already demonstrated significant potential in managing a spectrum of diseases, including autoimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis and type 1 diabetes, inflammatory conditions like inflammatory bowel disease, and transplant rejection, which is commonly encountered in organ and stem cell transplants. The trial's primary focus is on graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a severe complication that can occur after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). GVHD emerges when the donated immune cells attack the recipient's tissues, leading to symptoms ranging from mild to life-threatening. Currently, GVHD treatment relies on broad immunosuppressive therapies, which often come with significant side effects and may not always be effective. By recruiting participants for this clinical trial, we aim to assess the safety and efficacy of Tregs in mitigating the immune system's attack on the recipient's body. Autologous Tregs offer a more targeted approach due to their ability to distinguish between harmful and beneficial immune responses, potentially reducing the need for broad immunosuppression. The trial's structure includes dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases to evaluate optimal dosages, assess any adverse reactions, and measure the therapeutic benefits in GVHD management. Through this systematic and thorough evaluation, the investigators hope to refine Treg therapy and establish a clear safety profile. Ultimately, this trial seeks to unlock the therapeutic potential of autologous Tregs, paving the way for future applications in a broader range of conditions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
General criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Laboratory tests:
General criteria:
Autologous Regulatory T-Lymphocytes 1*10^6/kg, 2*10^6/kg, 4*10^6/kg and 8*10^6/kg, respectively until restrictive toxic reaction occurs
Other names: Regulatory T-Lymphocytes
Time frame: Baseline up to 60 days after taking Iguratimod]
Adverse events assessed according to NCI-CTCAE v5.0
Time frame: Month 1, 2, 3 and 4
Assessment of CR at Month 1, 2, 3 and 4. According to the CHRONIC GVHD ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT - CLINICIAN recorded in NIH Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;21(6):984-99.)
Time frame: Month 1, 2, 3 and 4
Assessment of CR at Month 1, 2, 3 and 4. According to the CHRONIC GVHD ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT - CLINICIAN recorded in NIH Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;21(6):984-99.)
Time frame: Month 1, 2, 3 and 4
Assessment of CR at Month 1, 2, 3 and 4. According to the CHRONIC GVHD ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT - CLINICIAN recorded in NIH Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;21(6):984-99.)
Time frame: Month 1, 2, 3 and 4
Assessment of CR at Month 1, 2, 3 and 4. According to the CHRONIC GVHD ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT - CLINICIAN recorded in NIH Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: IV. The 2014 Response Criteria Working Group report. (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jun;21(6):984-99.)
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Xuzhou Medical University
Other
Safety and Efficacy of Treg Cell in the Treatment of GVHD After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07728708
Chronic Graft vs. Host Disease, GVHD
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06995521
GVHD
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07570407
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Allogeneic HSCT
Pilsen, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT07302776
Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Bone Marrow Diseases
Palo Alto, California, United States
View Trial Details