tipifarnib
DrugTablet for oral administration
NCT Number: NCT03719690
An international, multicenter, open-label, 2 cohort, non-comparative, pivotal study evaluating the efficacy of tipifarnib in HRAS mutant HNSCC (AIM-HN). The first cohort will assess the objective response rate (ORR) of tipifarnib in subjects with HNSCC with HRAS mutations. The second study cohort, SEQ-HN, is an observational sub-study including HNSCC patients in whom HRAS mutations were not identified (wild type HRAS HNSCC) and who consent to provide first line outcome data and additional follow up.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
KO-TIP-007 is an international, multicenter, open-label, 2 cohort, non-comparative, pivotal study evaluating the efficacy of tipifarnib in HRAS mutant HNSCC (AIM-HN) and the impact of HRAS mutations on response to first line systemic therapies for HNSCC (SEQ-HN). KO-TIP-007 has 2 study cohorts. The first study cohort, named AIM-HN, includes HNSCC subjects with HRAS mutations. AIM-HN subjects will receive treatment with tipifarnib and the outcome of this cohort will be evaluated for ORR by an independent review facility.
The second study cohort, SEQ-HN, is an observational sub-study including HNSCC patients in whom HRAS mutations were not identified (wild type HRAS HNSCC) and who consent to provide first line outcome data and additional follow up.
HNSCC patients in whom HRAS mutations are identified and who meet eligibility criteria will be offered participation in AIM-HN. HNSCC patients in whom HRAS mutations are not identified may participate in SEQ-HN only. These patients will be followed and the comparison of outcomes of HRAS mutant and HRAS wild type HNSCC will address the exploratory objective to determine the effect of HRAS mutation on the ORR of first line systemic therapy in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Outcome data from subsequent lines of therapy will be collected.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
AIM-HN
Exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria
SEQ-HN
Exclusion criteria
SEQ-HN
Tablet for oral administration
In Vitro Assay to detect HRAS mutations
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who experienced a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR; disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR; at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions) and was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 by IRF. 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated by the exact binomial (Clopper-Pearson) method.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who experienced a BOR of CR or PR and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF. 95% CI was calculated by the exact binomial (Clopper-Pearson) method.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
DoR was defined as the time from the date of first response (CR or PR [whichever occurred first]) to the date of progression of disease or death of any cause, whichever occurred first, in participants with a confirmed CR or PR and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF. Median was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was based on Brookmeyer and Crowley method with log-log transformation.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
DoR was defined as the time from the date of first response (CR or PR [whichever occurred first]) to the date of progression of disease or death of any cause, whichever occurred first, in participants with a confirmed CR or PR and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF. Median was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was based on Brookmeyer and Crowley method with log-log transformation.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
PFS was defined as months from the first dose of the study drug to the first documented progressive disease (PD, appearance of one or more new lesions or at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions) or death, whichever came first and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF. Median was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was based on Brookmeyer and Crowley method with log-log transformation.
Time frame: Up to 28 approximately months
PFS was defined as months from the first dose of the study drug to the first documented PD or death, whichever came first and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF. Median was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was based on Brookmeyer and Crowley method with log-log transformation.
Time frame: 6 months and 9 months
PFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced documented PD or death, whichever came first and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF at 6 and 9 month timepoints. Percentage of participants was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was calculated using normal approximation to the log transformed cumulative hazard rate
Time frame: 6 months and 9 months
PFS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced documented PD or death, whichever came first and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF at 6 and 9 month timepoints. Percentage of participants was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was calculated using normal approximation to the log transformed cumulative hazard rate.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
OS was defined as months from first dose date until death from any cause. Median was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was based on Brookmeyer and Crowley method with log-log transformation.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
OS was defined as months from first dose date until death from any cause. Median was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was based on Brookmeyer and Crowley method with log-log transformation.
Time frame: 12 months
OS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced or death and was assessed at 12 months. Percentage of participants was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was calculated using normal approximation to the log transformed cumulative hazard rate.
Time frame: 12 months
OS rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had not experienced or death and was assessed at 12 months. Percentage of participants was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. 95% CI was calculated using normal approximation to the log transformed cumulative hazard rate.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
TTR was defined as months from treatment start to first CR or PR (whichever was first recorded) in participants with confirmed CR or PR and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF. TTR was summarized descriptively by summary statistics.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
TTR was defined as months from treatment start to first CR or PR (whichever was first recorded) in participants with confirmed CR or PR and was assessed using RECIST v1.1 by IRF. TTR was summarized descriptively by summary statistics.
Time frame: Up to approximately 28 months
TEAEs were defined as adverse events (AEs) that started on or after the first dose of the study drug and within 30 days of the last administration of the study drug. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 was used for toxicity grading (Grade 3: severe or disabling; Grade 4: life-threatening; Grade 5: death related to AE). Clinically significant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs, and electrocardiogram results were reported as AEs.
Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment Visit (up to approximately 28 months)
Change from Baseline score in pain, swallowing, speech problems, and senses problems subscales of EORTC QLQ-H&N35 are summarized individually. Raw scores for each subscale were linear transformations and standardized to range (0 - 100), with higher scores representing worse levels of symptoms. Change from Baseline was calculated as End of Treatment Observed - Baseline with a negative change representing a reduction in symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment Visit (up to approximately 28 months)
The EQ-VAS forms part of the EQ-5D-5L and collects the self-rating health status from 0 (the worst imaginable health) to 100 (the best imaginable health). Change from Baseline was calculated as End of Treatment Observed - Baseline with a negative change representing an increase in symptoms.
Kura Oncology, Inc.
Industry
A 2 Cohort, Non-comparative, Pivotal Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Tipifarnib in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) With HRAS Mutations (AIM-HN) and the Impact of HRAS Mutations on Response to First Line Systemic Therapies for HNSCC (SEQ-HN)
Acronym: AIM-HN/SEQ-HN
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04997902
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03082534
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
La Jolla, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03422536
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06446570
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial Details