Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00441428

Safety And Efficacy Of Solifenacin In Men With Overactive Bladder (OAB) And Detrusor Underactivity

Detrusor underactivity (DUA) in men is responsible for LUTS in a significant minority, the symptoms being indistinguishable from those seen in BOO. The International Continence Society (ICS) defines DUA as 'a detrusor contraction of inadequate magnitude and/or duration to effect complete bladder emptying in the absence of urethral obstruction. Whilst a reduced maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) is indicative of voiding dysfunction, flow studies cannot distinguish between DUA and BOO, which are the two principal causes of low flow rates. DUA is diagnosed from a pressure-flow study (PFS)and is characterized by a low-pressure, poorly sustained, or wave-like detrusor contraction with an associated poor flow rate.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is the most common term currently used in clinical medicine to describe a complex of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) with or without incontinence but most commonly consisting of urgency, frequency, nocturia, troublesome or incomplete emptying,and, occasionally, pain. With the exception of pain and incontinence, these symptoms are often found together; thus, the term LUTS has come to replace previous terms, such as urgency-frequency syndrome,urethral syndrome, and prostatism.

Drug treatment is frequently used as the initial management approach for LUTS in older men.Among men who desire treatment, general practice prescribing data have shown that antimuscarinics are not often given to elderly men. There is theoretical concern that the inhibitory effect of antimuscarinics on detrusor contraction could aggravate voiding difficulties or cause urinary retention in patients with BOO. There are virtually no data evaluating the safety and efficacy of solifenacin treatment in men with DUA and OAB.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Men aged > 40 years were eligible if by 7-day bladder diary they had urinary frequency (8 or more micturitions per 24 hours) and urgency, with or without urgency incontinence (1 or more episodes per 24 hours) together with coexistence low detrusor contractility.

Exclusion criteria

  • Urinary tract infection,
  • Bladder stone, urogenital tumors,
  • Prostate surgery,
  • Use of indwelling catheter or self-catheterization program,
  • Medications that could affect the lower urinary tract function,
  • History of neurological disease,
  • Acute urinary retention or any condition for which antimuscarinic was contraindicated.
  • Antimuscarinic, antispasmodic, or electrostimulation within 1 month;
  • Any investigational drug within 2 months; or
  • A 5a-reductase inhibitor within 3 months of screening.

Treatment and study plan

solifenacin

Drug

Primary outcomes

  1. We estimated the safety of solifenacin treatment by measuring the changes to day 120 of voiding function. The following variables were assessed: BVE, BCI, BOOI, Qmax obtained during UDS, PVR

Secondary outcomes

  1. We estimated the efficacy of solifenacin treatment. For this purpose, the primary efficacy measure was change in the number of urge incontinence episodes per week. Secondary efficacy measures included patient perception of treatment

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of L'Aquila

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2006
Primary completion
2007
First posted
Feb 28, 2007
Registry last updated
Jun 4, 2008

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.