Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04973332

Safety and Efficacy of SINOMED SR for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

A prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled, non-inferiority study to investigate the effectiveness and safety of SINOMED SR for endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Ganzhou Municipal Hospital, Ganzhou, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, 1:1, controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment assessing non-inferiority of SINOMED SR compared to Solitaire FR. The trial aims to randomize 220 patients 1:1 to receive SINOMED SR or Solitaire FR.The primary outcome is the Success rate of immediate recanalization.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

General inclusion criteria:

  • 18 years old or more;
  • NIHSS≥6 during randomization;
  • Pre-onset MRS < 2;
  • Acute ischemic stroke was diagnosed;
  • Within 24 hours from the onset of stroke to the completion of femoral artery puncture, regardless of whether intravenous thrombolysis has been performed;The time point of stroke onset was defined as the time point at which the patient's last normal condition was known;
  • The subject (or his/her guardian) agrees to participate in this study and signs the informed consent.

Image inclusion criteria:

  • When it is less than 6h (inclusive) from the onset of stroke to the completion of femoral artery puncture, patients should be examined by cranial CT or MR;
  • When it is more than 6h but less than 24h (inclusive) from the onset of stroke to the completion of femoral artery puncture, brain CT or MR should be performed and Aspects ≥6 points should be satisfied.(If immediate CT perfusion imaging or MR perfusion imaging is feasible, CTP or MRP is recommended to assist in the assessment of the infarct core, and Aspects ≥6 points shall also be satisfied);
  • DSA angiography showed acute intracranial arterial occlusion, including intracranial segment of internal carotid artery (C4-C7), middle cerebral artery (M1/M2), basilar artery and intracranial segment of vertebral artery (V4).

General exclusion criteria:

  • Neither MRI nor CT can be performed;
  • Hemorrhagic stroke or major ischemic stroke within 6 months before enrollment;
  • Severe persistent hypertension that cannot be controlled by venous hypotension, i.e., patients with SBP persistent >185mmHg and/or DBP persistent >110mmHg;
  • Suppose septic emboli or suspected bacterial endocarditis;
  • Renal failure, defined as: creatinine >3.0mg/dL(264 mol/L);
  • Blood glucose < 2.78mmol/L (50mg/dL) or >22.20mmol/L (400mg/dL);
  • decreased platelet count (< 40×109/L);
  • Known bleeding tendency, defect of coagulation factor, taking anticoagulants and INR > 3.0;
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • known to be severely allergic to contrast agents and known to be allergic to nickel materials;
  • The presence of diseases that may affect the assessment of neurological function (such as neurological diseases, mental diseases, etc.);
  • with heart, lung, liver function failure or other serious diseases to interventional surgery;
  • Participating in clinical trials of other drugs or devices;
  • Life expectancy less than 6 months;
  • Other conditions judged by the researcher to be unsuitable for inclusion.

Image exclusion criteria:

  • CT or MR imaging evidence of intracranial hemorrhage or known bleeding tendency;
  • CT/MR/DSA showed > occlusion (such as bilateral internal carotid artery occlusion at the same time, or anterior circulation and posterior circulation intracranial vessels occlusion at the same time, or internal carotid intracranial and extracranial segments occlusion at the same time);
  • Carotid artery dissection, carotid initial occlusion or arteritis;
  • The vascular circuitry was severe, and the intracranial thrombectomy stent was difficult to reach the target position.

Treatment and study plan

Intracranial thrombectomy stent

Device

Intracranial thrombectomy stents for ischemic stroke patients within 24 hours of symptom onset

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Successful Immediate Recanalization

    Time frame: Within 24 hours post-procedure

    The criteria for successful immediate recanalization were target recanalization with a mTICI grade of 2b or 3 grade

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score of 0-2 Points at 90 Days After Surgery

    Time frame: pre-procedure, and 90 days post-procedure

    The Modified Rankin Scale is a global measure of functional disability ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death), where lower scores indicate a better outcome. A score of 0-2 is commonly interpreted as a favorable functional outcome.

  2. Vascular Recanalization Time

    Time frame: intra-operative

    The time from femoral artery puncture to vascular recanalization or the end time of surgery for patients with no vascular recanalization. Vascular recanalization time = successful recanalization time - femoral artery puncture time

  3. The National Institute of Health Stroke Scale Score Decreased the Rate of Subjects With > 4 Points

    Time frame: 7 days post-procedure

    The number of subjects exhibiting a >4-point decrease on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; range 0-42, where higher scores indicate worse neurological deficit).

  4. Number of Devices Successfully Operated

    Time frame: intra-operative

    Devices Successfully Operated defined devices completed conveying, releasing and retracting.

  5. Number of Participants Who Experienced Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage Within 24 h Post-procedure

    Time frame: within 24 hours post-procedure

    Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 24 h, specifically intracranial hemorrhage (intracranial parenchymal hematoma, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and ventricular hemorrhage) accompanied by neurological deterioration

  6. Number of Participants Who Died Within 90 Days

    Time frame: within 90 days

    The count of all deaths from any cause occurring within 90 days post-procedure among participants who received the intracranial thrombectomy stent.

  7. Number of Device Defects

    Time frame: intra-operative

    The count of defects (e.g., device breakage, incorrect labeling) identified in the research devices during the clinical trial.

  8. Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    Time frame: Within 90 days post-procedure

    The count of participants who experienced at least one serious adverse event (SAE) after receiving thrombectomy with the intracranial thrombectomy device.

  9. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE)

    Time frame: Within 90 days post-procedure

    The count of participants who experienced at least one adverse event (AE) after receiving thrombectomy with the intracranial thrombectomy device.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Sinomed Neurovita Technology Inc.

Industry

Collaborators

  • The General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command

Registry information

Official study title

A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled, Non-inferiority Study to Investigate the Effectiveness and Safety of Intracranial Embolization Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jul 22, 2021
Registry last updated
Feb 27, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.