Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06567652

Safety and Efficacy of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Ablation With a Cryoballoon Technology

The goal of this retrospective observational study is to learn about the safety and efficacy of cryoballoon catheter ablation in 80 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using the PolarX (Boston scientific) cryoablation technology. The main question it aims to answer is if it is safe and effective.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

UZ Brussel Heart Rhythm Management Center

Brussels, 1090, Belgium

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • persistent atrial fibrillation patients undergoing first atrial fibrillation ablation procedure with PolarX cryoballoon

Exclusion criteria

  • previous atrial fibrillation ablation or cardiac surgery,
  • paroxysmal atrial fibrillation,
  • congenital heart disease,
  • non-treated coronary artery disease,
  • intracavitary thrombus,
  • significant valvular disease,
  • contraindications to general anesthesia.

Treatment and study plan

Catheter ablation

Device

All patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (and eventually left atrial posterior wall isolation) with the POLARx™ cryoballoon system

Primary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness

    Time frame: 1 year follow-up

    Primary effectiveness failure is defined as the composite of any of the following occurrences:

    Failure to achieve acute procedural success at the index procedure (pulmonary vein isolation); More than one repeat procedure during the blanking period (within 90 days post-index procedure); Documented atrial fibrillation, or new onset of atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia event (≥ 30 seconds in duration or from a 10 second 12-lead ECG) Repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation, or new onset of atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia Electrical and/or pharmacological cardioversion

    • Prescribed a new antiarrhythmic drug not documented at baseline Prescribed a higher dose of antiarrhythmic drug documented at baseline
  2. Safety of the procedure

    Time frame: The safety endpoint was evaluated at 7-days 30-days and 1-year follow-up

    Safety is defined as the composite of any of the following occurrences:

    Death Myocardial infarction Persistent gastroparesis/injury to vagus nerve Stroke/Transient ischemic attack Thromboembolism/ Air embolism Cardiac tamponade/perforation Pneumothorax Serious vascular access complications* Pulmonary edema/Heart Failure Ablation related atrioventricular block not attributable to medication effect or vasovagal reaction.

    Safety events (0-30 days post procedure) Symptomatic pericardial effusion Safety events (0-360 days post procedure) Atrial esophageal fistula Persistent Phrenic nerve injury Pulmonary Vein Stenosis

    • Including hematoma requiring intervention or prolongation of hospital stay, artero-venous fistulas or pseudoaneurysm.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Aug 23, 2024
Registry last updated
Aug 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.