College Station, Texas, United States
NCT Number: NCT02132117
Safety and Efficacy of Oxymetazoline HCl Cream 1.0% in Patients With Persistent Erythema Associated With Rosacea
This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxymetazoline hydrochloride (HCl) cream 1.0% (AGN-199201) once daily compared to vehicle for the treatment of persistent moderate to severe facial erythema associated with rosacea.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary location
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
-Moderate to severe persistent facial erythema associated with rosacea.
Exclusion criteria
- Greater than 3 inflammatory lesions on the face
- Current treatment with monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors
- Raynaud's syndrome, narrow angle glaucoma, orthostatic hypotension, scleroderma or Sjogren's syndrome.
Treatment and study plan
Oxymetazoline HCL Cream 1.0%
DrugOxymetazoline HCL Cream 1.0% (AGN-199201) applied to the face once daily for 29 days.
Vehicle to Oxymetazoline HCL Cream
DrugVehicle to Oxymetazoline HCL Cream (AGN-199201) applied to the face once daily for 29 days.
Primary outcomes
-
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-Grade Improvement (Decrease) From Baseline on Both Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA) and Subject Self-Assessment for Rosacea Facial Redness (SSA) 5-point Scales
Time frame: Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12)
The investigator assessed the participant's overall severity of erythema in the treatment area by using the 5-point CEA scale with photonumeric guide where: 0=clear skin with no signs of erythema (best) to 4=severe erythema; fiery redness (worst). A decrease in the score indicates improvement. The participant assessed their overall severity of rosacea facial redness in the treatment area by using the 5-point SSA scale with photoguide where: 0=no signs of unwanted redness (best) to 4=severe redness (worst). A decrease in the score indicates improvement. The percentage of participants with at least a 2-grade decrease (improvement) on both CEA and SSA from Baseline was evaluated over the 12-hour evaluation period (hours 3, 6, 9, and 12) post-dose on Day 29. Baseline was defined as the measurement at pre-dose on Day 1.
Secondary outcomes
-
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-Grade Improvement (Decrease) From Baseline on SSA at Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12 on Day 29
Time frame: Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12)
The participant assessed their overall severity of rosacea facial redness in the treatment area by using the 5-point SSA scale with photoguide where: 0=no signs of unwanted redness (best) to 4=severe redness (worst). A decrease in the score indicates improvement. The percentage of participants with at least a 2-grade decrease (improvement) on SSA from Baseline was evaluated over the 12-hour evaluation period (hours 3, 6, 9, and 12) post-dose on Day 29.
-
Percent Change From Baseline on Rosacea Facial Redness as Measured by Digital Imaging Analysis (DIA) at Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12 on Day 29
Time frame: Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12)
DIA of photographs was used to assess rosacea facial redness and was defined as percentage of facial area occupied by redness. A higher value in the percentage of facial area occupied by facial redness indicated more redness. A negative/ lower number percent change from Baseline indicates improvement.
-
Percentage of Participants Satisfied or Very Satisfied on Item #9 of Satisfaction Assessment for Rosacea Facial Redness (SAT-RFR) at Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12 on Day 29
Time frame: Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12)
Participants assessed their treatment satisfaction by answering Item #9 of the SAT-RFR: "Right now, how satisfied are you with the effect your study medication had on your facial redness?" using a 5-point scale where 0= very dissatisfied, 1=dissatisfied, 2=neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 3=satisfied, or 4=very satisfied. The percentage of participants who answered Satisfied or Very Satisfied is reported.
-
Change From Baseline on the Symptom Assessment for Rosacea Facial Redness (SA-RFR) Item # 4 at Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12 on Day 29
Time frame: Baseline, Day 29 (Hours 3, 6, 9 and 12)
Participants assessed the burning sensation associated with rosacea facial redness by answering Item #4 of the SA-RFR: "Right now, how much does your face burn because of your facial redness?" using a 5-point scale where 0=less severe to 4=severe. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
-
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-Grade Improvement (Decrease) From Baseline on SSA at Hour 1 on Day 1
Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 (Hour 1)
The participant assessed their overall severity of rosacea facial redness in the treatment area by using the 5-point SSA scale with photoguide where: 0=no signs of unwanted redness (best) to 4=severe redness (worst). A decrease in the score indicates improvement.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Allergan
Industry
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2015
- First posted
- May 7, 2014
- Registry last updated
- Nov 18, 2019
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Efficacy and Safety Study Comparing CD07805/47 Gel 0.5% to Azelaic Acid Gel 15% in Subjects With Erythema of Rosacea
NCT01659853
Erythema, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Evansville, Indiana, United States
View Trial DetailsAn Evaluation of the Reduction in Erythema in Adult Patients With Moderate to Severe Persistent Facial Erythema Associated With Rosacea
NCT03352323
Erythema, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
College Station, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsPatient-Reported Outcome Of Facial Erythema (PROOF)
NCT01885000
Erythema, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Berlin, Germany
View Trial DetailsA Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Study AGN-19920 in Patients With Persistent Erythema Associated With Rosacea
NCT02095158
Erythema, Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial Details